Sentences with phrase «traditional divorce process»

The traditional divorce process can be extremely expensive and can create an adversarial climate that can require lengthy litigation, which is often unnecessary.
In the traditional divorce process, countless depositions and hearings are held as each party conducts a fishing expedition into the other party's finances; in the collaborative process, the clients retain a joint neutral financial professional to ensure transparency, develop options for family support and division of property and debt, and help the clients transition into single life on a firmer financial footing.
I understand the alternatives to the traditional divorce process.
In the traditional divorce process, the most important factor is the law; in the collaborative process, the most important factor is the family and its values.
In the traditional divorce process, disputes are resolved by a judge in a public courtroom; in the collaborative process, disputes are resolved by the spouses in private conference rooms.
In the traditional divorce process, attorneys present argument, submit evidence, and provide expert witnesses to show why their client is a better parent and the opposing party is a worse parent; in the collaborative process, parents use a joint neutral facilitator with a mental health licensure to help develop a parenting plan that is emotionally and developmentally tailored to their children's needs.
I will work closely with you to find an alternative to the traditional divorce process, a process that is stressful, time - consuming and expensive.
More often than not, the option that makes sense is not the traditional divorce process.
In the traditional divorce process, an adversarial process dictates that spouses are «opposing parties» and their attorneys are «opposing counsel;» in the collaborative process, spouses are recognized as co-parents and their attorneys are collaborative colleagues and teammates.
The length of time needed for a collaborative divorce is often substantially less than that of the traditional divorce process, where the parties are at the mercy of the court's schedule.
For most people, they will go through the traditional divorce process.
The traditional divorce process could last for years, not only in waiting for the court's availability but also in completing the tedious process of document sharing and compilation.
In mediation, unlike the traditional divorce process, you work cooperatively with a neutral third party (the mediator).
In practical terms, this means that the attorneys are not conducting the usual opposition research to highlight an opposing party's parental or other flaws in preparation for trial (which can be the most destructive part of the traditional divorce process).
The traditional divorce process can be expensive and time - consuming, and often produces solutions that don't work very effectively.
heir sake, or maybe you want to avoid the time and expense of the traditional divorce process.
Maybe you have minor children and need to get along for their sake, or maybe you want to avoid the time and expense of the traditional divorce process.
To the extent you and your partner are willing however you can, in large part, avoid the exaggerated injury that often accompanies the traditional divorce process.
The quality of the agreements couples have been guided to making are a marked improvement over those of a traditional divorce process.
And unlike the traditional divorce process where all the work goes on behind the scenes, participants in mediation are much more aware of delays and the costs they are incurring.
Your company does not have to be a casualty of the traditional divorce process.
In the traditional divorce process, attorneys separately bill their hourly rates to gather, organize, and review their client's financial disclosure and review and scrutinize the opposing party's information.
In the traditional divorce process, disputes are resolved by a judge in a public courtroom; in the collaborative process, disputes are resolved by the spouses in private conference rooms.
In the traditional divorce process, attorneys present argument, submit evidence, and provide expert witnesses to show why their client is a better parent and the opposing party is a worse parent; in the collaborative process, parents use a joint neutral facilitator with a mental health licensure to help develop a parenting plan that is emotionally and developmentally tailored to their children's needs.
In practical terms, this means that the attorneys are not conducting the usual opposition research to highlight an opposing party's parental or other flaws in preparation for trial (which can be the most destructive part of the traditional divorce process).
Like divorce for other married couples, dissolving a Civil Union or same sex marriage can be costly if using the traditional divorce process.
In the traditional divorce process, an adversarial process dictates that spouses are «opposing parties» and their attorneys are «opposing counsel;» in the collaborative process, spouses are recognized as co-parents and their attorneys are collaborative colleagues and teammates.
In the traditional divorce process, the most important factor is the law; in the collaborative process, the most important factor is the family and its values.
In the traditional divorce process, countless depositions and hearings are held as each party conducts a fishing expedition into the other party's finances; in the collaborative process, the clients retain a joint neutral financial professional to ensure transparency, develop options for family support and division of property and debt, and help the clients transition into single life on a firmer financial footing.
One of the most painful aspects of the traditional divorce process is that it seems to drag on forever.
I am a divorce attorney and I help people just like you end their marriages without having to suffer the uncertainty and painful drama that is often part of the traditional divorce process.
This means that, unlike the traditional divorce process, spouses in the collaborative process are not seen as «opposing parties» but as teammates.
So mediation is almost always more cost effective than the traditional divorce process.
In recent years, a new alternative to the traditional divorce process — a concept called collaborative divorce — has become increasingly accepted as an effective way to settle differences in a divorce.
In the collaborative process, each party retains separate counsel, as would happen in the traditional divorce process.
She believes in using alternative dispute resolution methods, such as mediation and collaborative law, instead of the traditional divorce process.
Although the traditional divorce process tends to make people focus on the legal and financial elements of divorce, unless a couple addresses the emotional elements that underlie the end of their relationship, they will have a lot of trouble getting through their divorce amicably.
Sue used the traditional divorce process and had a good relationship with her lawyer.
In the traditional divorce process, both parties obtain legal representation and the attorneys provide most of the recommendations regarding how financial assets should be split.
This roadmap is from someone who has made dazzling discoveries in the trenches, as a judge observing the damage our traditional divorce process inflicts on so many who are touched by it.»
Divorcing couples can spend thousands of dollars and give up many years of their lives to the traditional divorce process.
Collaborative divorce is typically much less money than a contested divorce and unsurprisingly, it's rapidly gaining momentum across the country as the preferred alternative to the traditional divorce process.
Litigation is the traditional divorce process.
These are two key components which are often missing from the traditional divorce process.
In the traditional divorce process, Lawton says, what is important to each person is not taken into account.
Mediation as an Alternative to the Traditional Divorce Process If you have concluded that your marriage can not be saved, but you want to maintain a positive relationship with your ex-spouse, or you simply want to resolve your disputes with a... Continue reading →
The Collaborative Divorce Process In recent years, a new alternative to the traditional divorce process — a concept called collaborative divorce — has become increasingly accepted as an effective way to settle differences in a divorce.
If you use the traditional divorce process (i.e. litigation), however, you will get hit with the «double whammy» of having to cope with both the trauma of the divorce, and the trauma of living through litigation... at the same time.
The collaborative method may be more cost - effective and involve a shorter time frame than the traditional divorce process.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z