Sentences with phrase «traditional divorcing spouses»

Divorce mediators, in contrast, explain that mediators can effectively address the power imbalance between such traditional divorcing spouses and that the mediation process can result in a fair settlement.

Not exact matches

The collaborative divorce process offers divorcing spouses flexibility not available in traditional divorce.

In the traditional divorce process, disputes are resolved by a judge in a public courtroom; in the collaborative process, disputes are resolved by the spouses in private conference rooms.

In the traditional divorce process, an adversarial process dictates that spouses are «opposing parties» and their attorneys are «opposing counsel;» in the collaborative process, spouses are recognized as co-parents and their attorneys are collaborative colleagues and teammates.

In traditional divorce, since each spouse is zealously represented by their respective attorneys, it is no surprise that these proceedings are quite costly due to the extensive time involved in building a case for one's positions, often with the assistance of one or more forensic accountants or business appraisers.

Here's How the Process Works: The traditional method of initiating a divorce action requires your attorney to serve your spouse with the divorce action at your spouse's last known address, or in hand if your spouse can be located elsewhere.

Unlike in traditional divorce, each spouse will have an attorney who will focus solely on helping the family reach an agreement that is acceptable to everyone.

Unlike traditional divorce litigation, matrimonial arbitration is conducted in private, between the spouses, their attorneys and the arbitrator.

For over 25 years I have represented spouses getting divorced through the traditional litigation model.

The spouses then proceed as «opposing parties» in the traditional divorce court route.

If you and your spouse have a history of violence between you, you probably should use more traditional methods for negotiating your divorce.

«Leaning Out» generally describes a spouse who is considering divorce or not willing to work on the marriage in traditional couples therapy, while «Leaning In» describes a spouse who wants to save the relationship and is willing to work on it.

Instead, Discernment Counseling acknowledges the reality that one spouse is often «leaning out» of the relationship (considering divorce and not sure that traditional couples therapy will help) while the other is «leaning in» (interested in rebuilding and working on the marriage).

Unlike in traditional divorce, each spouse will have an attorney who will focus solely on helping the family reach an agreement that is acceptable to everyone.

This may be because collaborative attorneys, unlike traditional divorce trial lawyers, have an incentive to help the spouses get along.

However, it is a reasonable alternative to the traditional divorce court battles and has the potential to save spouses a great deal of money.

Where common law marriages are recognized as legal, they must end in the death of one spouse or by divorce, just like traditional marriages.

I suggest you tell your spouse that divorce mediation is cheaper and faster than a traditional divorce.

Most serious practitioners of matrimonial law now recognize the limitations that the traditional judicial system has to offer divorcing spouses.

Like other alternatives to the traditional litigated divorce, collaborative divorce is a more dignified way of separating that allows the spouses, the children, and even the assets, to emerge healthy.

In the traditional divorce action, each spouse normally retains his or her own attorney.

Adversarial Divorce: In an adversarial divorce, you and your spouse each hire an adversarial, traditional attorney to fight fDivorce: In an adversarial divorce, you and your spouse each hire an adversarial, traditional attorney to fight fdivorce, you and your spouse each hire an adversarial, traditional attorney to fight for you.

Unlike most states, you and your spouse don't have to resolve all issues to end your marriage, but you must live separate and apart from each other for at least a year to get a traditional divorce.

If a traditional lawyer - negotiated divorce would cost you (in round figures) $ 4,000, and instead, you spend $ 2,000 on mediation (which you split 50/50 with your spouse) and $ 2,000 on legal services, your total cost would be $ 3,000.

In most cases, divorcing spouses resolve the issues in dispute through mediation, the collaborative divorce process, through the traditional litigation model before trial, negotiation between attorneys, and sometimes with the assistance of the court.

In those cases in which mediation, collaborative divorce, or other alternative means of dispute resolution are not viable alternatives, spouses will litigate their divorce in the traditional manner.

Traditional couples do exist, but these divorcing spouses can still use the mediation process effectively.

Traditional divorce defines spouses as adversaries, courtrooms as battlefields, and lawyers as gladiators.

By traditional, I mean divorcing couples who seek out attorneys that will «fight for their rights» to make sure they get the best deal in the divorce, even if it means their spouse will suffer as a consequence.

This means that, unlike the traditional divorce process, spouses in the collaborative process are not seen as «opposing parties» but as teammates.

If both you and your spouse are motivated and ready to move forward, Collaborative divorce tends to take less time and cost less money than litigation or more traditional negotiations.

But, if the traditional divorce court process has been making you miserable, chances are it has also been just as devastating to your spouse, and so he or she may be open to trying something different.

Although divorce litigation is viewed as the traditional route for couples who are parting ways, it can increase tensions between the parties and make already contentious spouses even less civil for several reasons.

Traditional divorce litigation is a process that, by the nature of the design, tends to bring out the worst in parents and spouses.

Unlike the traditional litigated divorce process that is finalized by a judge in court, mediation lets you and your former spouse maintain control of your separate futures — and maintain control over your children's future and your relationships with them.

If one spouse is unwilling to compromise or participate in the divorce process, traditional litigation may be preferable.

In the traditional, adversarial, litigation based divorce process the enemy is typically defined as your spouse.

A Crystal Lake high net worth divorce lawyer can help them if there is a substantial amount of money in the marriage that will need to be evenly split between the spouses through the divorce process, whether traditional or collaborative strategies are used.

Open and Full Disclosure by both you and your spouse, unlike in traditional litigation, is required by the Collaborative divorce process to provide each other full and honest disclosure of all relevant information.

The traditional litigated divorce is often what most people imagine when they picture divorcing spouses.

Logistically, the traditional divorce process may be complicated if one spouse is deployed or on active - duty.

Unlike in a traditional divorce case, where each spouse may hire and pay for his or her own financial advisor to work exclusively with that party, a financial professional in a Collaborative Divorce is completely ndivorce case, where each spouse may hire and pay for his or her own financial advisor to work exclusively with that party, a financial professional in a Collaborative Divorce is completely nDivorce is completely neutral.

Mediation is a cost - effective alternative to the traditional divorce and, when both spouses are well prepared, can result in an efficient divorce.

While collaborative law is not usually the least expensive divorce process, it affords you and your spouse much greater privacy, flexibility, and control than traditional litigation.

You can file for divorce and serve your spouse the traditional way.

Unlike in traditional litigation, the spouses in a collaborative divorce are able to set the pace of the process and are not tied to the schedule of the court.

Collaborative divorce is a subset of collaborative practice in which spouses can obtain a divorce outside of the traditional process of litigation.

Unlike traditional litigation, the spouses in a collaborative divorce are able to set the pace of the process and are not tied to the schedule of the court.