Independent public schools of choice could turn out to be as disruptive to
traditional education systems as those crummy little Sony radios turned out to be to the vacuum - tube behemoths and as Honda was to Detroit.
These could turn out to be as disruptive, and ultimately as devastating, to
traditional education systems as those crummy little Sony radios turned out to be to the vacuum - tube behemoths and as Honda was to Detroit.
Not exact matches
If you're not into the side effects your family experiences from the
traditional education system in your area, then it's a lot more work to try and undo the «damage» of that experience in your family
as opposed to seeking alternatives like homeschooling or unschooling.
James Malatras, chief of staff and vice chancellor of the State University of New York, said
traditional Kindergarten through 12th grade
education and post-secondary
education should be treated
as a unified
system.
There are more such obstacles than one might think, and every one of them will prove hard to overcome, because they are deeply carved into our
traditional K — 12
system and regarded
as valuable protections or benefits by
education's innumerable factions, bureaucracies, and interest groups.
The first sees chartering
as an
education system operating alongside
traditional districts.
To overcome this apparent problem, the
education system needs to configure how best to merge
traditional teaching and technology without compromising on the development of soft
as well
as hard skills».
Here's my attempt at the first of those five strategies: «Build a new
system via charter schools,
education savings accounts, or similar mechanisms»
as an alternative to today's
traditional, ossified one.
To establish that the school was a «state actor,» he made five arguments: that Arizona law defines a charter school
as a public school; that a charter school is a state actor for all purposes, including employment; that a charter school provides a public
education, a function that is traditionally and exclusively the prerogative of the state; that a charter school is a state actor in Arizona because the state regulates the personnel matters of such schools; and that it is a state actor because charter schools, unlike
traditional private schools, are permitted to participate in the state's retirement
system.
As education journalist Valerie Strauss reported on her blog at the Washington Post, DeVos «made some controversial statements» about public schools, «calling the
traditional public
education system a «dead end.
However there are several quotes from the research that has me
as a father and concerned
education advocate asking questions of whether this study is aligned with educators in both charter and
traditional schools and reform proponents and parents working toward a better
education system in our communities, cities, and ultimately nationwide.
We believe,
as earlier described, a charter
system that is intended to advance
education, work with children and families
as well
as educators from
traditional schools is the only way to empower parents.
«Just
as the
traditional taxi
systems revolted against ridesharing, so too does the
education establishment feel threatened by the rise of school choice.
But critics see charters
as part of the movement to privatize public
education, and the growth of charter schools has drained many
traditional public school
systems.
... Just
as the
traditional taxi
system revolted against ridesharing, so too does the
education establishment feel threatened by the rise of school choice.
As a former home - school parent / advocate, I wanted to be a part of a movement that provided additional FREE excellent
education opportunities outside of the
traditional public school
system.»
The
traditional system, whereby teachers are paid based solely on their years of experience and level of
education, has caused many critics to claim that it does not promote good teaching, or is not
as fair
as other
systems that pay based on performance, ability in certain skills, or willingness to teach in areas of high need.
What is your motivation for censoring my posts comparing AGW fake fisics with
traditional real world empirically tested and well understood physics
as still taught by some, primarily in applied science fields, but no longer taught in the general
education system?
Similarly, Fishberg advises to «stick with
traditional section headers in the ATS version of your resume, such
as «
Education» and «Professional Experience,» that are sure to be understood by all
systems.»