With
traditional library lending, the library buys a certain number of e-book copies of a particular title.
Unlike
traditional library lending, there are no limits on the number of copies available or how many people can simultaneously borrow the same title.
With
traditional library lending, the library buys a certain number of eBook copies of a particular title.
Not exact matches
I agree that the model they have with services like Overdrive is somewhat problematic, more of a lease than ownership, and I agree that
traditional publishers have been unreasonable here, but e-book
lending is an extremely high growth, high use area for my
library system.
If public
libraries don't do something to play catchup in this game (perhaps through a comprehensive
lending agreement with
traditional publishers), they are going to be sidelined — a great tragedy for American society.
We've described a number of times at GigaOM how Amazon (s amzn) is disrupting the
traditional book - publishing business, both by allowing authors to self - publish and do an end - run around the
traditional industry, and by signing writers to its own imprint — as well as starting its own e-book
lending library and other ventures.
Library e-book
lending has several advantages — and several disadvantages — over borrowing a book from a
traditional library.
I agree that Amazon's new
lending library isn't going to be much of a threat to
traditional libraries.
We still haven't had a major breakthrough in the standoff between the Bigs in
traditional publishing and ebook - starved
lending libraries.
From
traditional welcome snacks to a
lending library of books and board games, The Surfjack goes out of its way to make you feel at home.