At Stephens & Margolin LLP we help clients with
both traditional litigation cases and collaborative cases.
I also accept
traditional litigation cases.
Moreover, he or she will review and analyze the documents much quicker than attorneys are able to do in
traditional litigation cases, thus saving the clients many billable hours.
Not exact matches
They include: wills, trusts and probate, small claims civil
litigation, employment law and personal injury
cases, conveyancing, debt recovery, landlord / tenant — any kind of
case where representation in a
traditional manner is not cost effective.
That means
cases with good legal merits, quantum and enforceability, although as noted above, insurers can often take on
cases where the economics would not be viable for
traditional litigation finance.
Beyond
traditional litigation, the attorneys of the firm are industry leaders in the area of Alternative Dispute Resolution («ADR») in domestic relations
cases.
We are experienced in
traditional litigation, negotiated settlements, and the collaborative divorce method, and we will work with you to determine which approach best fits your
case.
If the insurer is not willing to settle the
case, or have the
case resolved through other ways, I have extensive experience in
traditional litigation.
Alternatively, a collaborative
case is much more collegial than
traditional litigation, and therefore will cost less.
Despite best efforts of individual legal publishers, there are many understandable reasons for incomplete databases: — problems with obtaining access to
cases available on one service that are no longer available from the source, — copyright claims and the threat of
litigation by
traditional print publishers respecting print law report series, — the control exercised by SOQUIJ over access to Quebec
cases, and / or — the lack of the will by the publisher to identify and and acquire missing
cases identified by means of a database audit.
Third party funding developments make
cases viable in the competition arena that are no longer practically possible in
traditional domestic group
litigation.
A judge who had been a labour lawyer once remarked in my presence (so this is the only citation you get)-- in exactly this context of the potential threat to lawyers» practices from ADR in civil
litigation — that the practice of labour law showed how lawyers could make a good living resolving a lot of disputes quickly, rather than through the
traditional civil
litigation model of mining a few
cases deeply over a long period.
Its representes both private and public sector employers in a number of
traditional labor law matters, including employer defense in labor arbitrations of all types, employment discrimination
litigation, wrongful discharge and related tort
cases, union organizing campaigns, and collective bargaining negotiations.
Washington, DC About Blog Barrister Digital Solutions, LLC provides e-discovery, early
case assesment, web hosting and
traditional litigation support services to law firms, corporations and government agencies in the Mid Atlantic region.
Your
case could also be suitable for collaborative divorce, a relatively new legal approach that combines the best aspects of mediation and
traditional litigation — but also enables you to settle your
case outside of the courtroom with the assistance of specially trained attorneys and neutral counselors and financial experts, if needed.
In most
cases, divorcing spouses resolve the issues in dispute through mediation, the collaborative divorce process, through the
traditional litigation model before trial, negotiation between attorneys, and sometimes with the assistance of the court.
This firm specializes in alternative dispute resolution in divorce
cases, as well as
traditional litigation.
In cooperative and collaborative divorce practice, the
traditional approach of bargaining from a specific position, backed by threats of
litigation and court hearings, is replaced by an approach that settles
cases mindfully, practically, and respectfully.
I now bring those principles and skills to all my
cases, including those that remain in
traditional litigation.
This is in contrast to the
traditional litigation approach which requires your attorney to file your
case with the court, prepare for appearing in court, and follow the court - imposed rules and schedules.
Since the attorney disqualification agreement appears to be a requirement of the collaborative law process, in the off chance that the
case does not settle in collaborative mediation, if there is no disqualification agreement, the parties are free to continue using their attorneys in the
traditional litigation divorce process, which would not be an option with collaborative law.
In Collaborative Practice, the
traditional approach of bargaining from a specific position, backed by threats of
litigation and court intervention, is replaced by an approach that settles
cases respectfully.
Unfortunately this is often the
case, particularly if the method to obtain the divorce is the
traditional litigation method.
If you put work into your settlement from the very beginning of your
case then you increase the chance that the divorce process will take less time, be more amicable, and be more cost - efficient than a
traditional litigation approach to divorce.
Its representes both private and public sector employers in a number of
traditional labor law matters, including employer defense in labor arbitrations of all types, employment discrimination
litigation, wrongful discharge and related tort
cases, union organizing campaigns, and collective bargaining negotiations.
In a
traditional negotiation and in
litigation, lawyers continue to charge fees whether or not the
case settles.
In most
cases, mediation is a less expensive and a faster dispute resolution option than
traditional litigation.