The remarks follow what you would typically expect from a controversial nominee trying to tip toe around her record of zealously advocating tearing down
traditional public education even in the face of evidence of failure.
Intensive reading instruction and remediation is an afterthought in
traditional public education even though it is known that 40 percent of kids will need such help no matter what their parents do at home.
Not exact matches
But this article on private tuition for special
education «burdens» is
even worse because the burden on the district isn't the total cost, but the cost for private placement in excess of what the district would have spent if they had served these disabled students in
traditional public schools.
The Cristo Rey Schools»
education - business model stands in stark contrast to the under - investment in human capital — of the
traditional public school business model, or
even traditional Catholic schools — and offers ways to address imperfections in the
education market.
Thus,
even while the right
education is more valuable than ever, the
public perception that
traditional schools are overpriced, overcrowded, and irrelevant to the modern workplace has contributed to an atmosphere of crisis.
They primarily concern the fundamental complexity of turning around the behemoth of
public education, as well as the amount of time, sophistication, multitasking, and sustained effort that's needed to cause it to deviate
even a little from its
traditional course.
Even worse is that these conditions are aided and abetted by defenders of
traditional public education practices, who argue that the problems of American
public education can not be solved until poverty is eradicated and parents and other reformers are kept out of schools.
For those of us who cover the nation's
education crisis, it is easy to joke about the ranting and raving of some defenders of
traditional public education, who have what they consider to be clever names for charter schools and impugn the motivations of reformers with wealth (
even as they defend teachers unions who bring in $ 622 million every year through dues collected forcibly from teachers who may or many not
even support their aims).
Madison schools are dominated by white staff, and the mostly white School Board and teachers union have a generally dim view of charter and voucher schools and anything else that veers too far from the
traditional (white - dominated) model of Madison
public education —
even as that model has long been plagued by racial achievement gaps.
This surprises me because
even though charter schools are publicly funded you would think the quality of
education would be better in comparison to
traditional public schools.
Even worse for Weingarten and the AFT, Duncan didn't take too kindly to her attempt to shame him into submission; he doubled down on his earlier remarks, arguing that the AFTs (and NEA's) defense of
traditional teacher compensation policies «undercut the
public's confidence in
public education.»
Charter school supporters say they are providing opportunities for students in areas with poor
traditional public schools to have a better alternative to get an
education, and some have
even framed it in language of civil rights.
«We're increasingly recognizing the importance of physical activity for children
even as the academic demands placed on them are cutting into the
traditional programs of recess and physical
education,» said Gerd Bobe, an assistant professor in the OSU College of Agricultural Sciences, an expert in
public health nutrition and behavior, and principal investigator with the Linus Pauling Institute.
Yet, research has not found charters to be particularly innovative (Preston, Goldring, Berends, & Cannata, 2012) and
even U.S. Secretary of
Education Arne Duncan (2013) has criticized them for looking like
traditional public schools.
Held to a higher standard of accountability than
traditional public schools, but with the benefit of added autonomy that puts local school leaders and teachers in charge, Tennessee's
public charter schools are empowered to create a challenging and focused learning environment for students, while giving parents
even more direct and meaningful opportunities to participate in their children's
education.
Brown v. Board of
Education was not about saving Black children from inferior schools, as Malcolm Gladwell discussed recently on his Revisionist History podcast,
even though that's the version of history we were all taught in our
traditional public schooling.
Now, my own feelings about Teach for America are hardly a secret (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/10/17/a-professors-encounter-with-two-teach-for-america-recruiters/), but
even I was a bit surprised that TFA would tip their hand on their real agenda: destroying
traditional teacher
education programs, teachers unions, and
public schools as we know them.