Are reports of charter vs.
traditional public school achievement gains valid?
Not exact matches
Bill Gates» philanthropic organization, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, is making an about - face on its education priorities to focus on networks of
traditional public schools aimed at improving student
achievement.
Charter
school students in grades 3 through 8 perform better than we would expect, based on the performance of comparable students in
traditional public schools, on both the math and reading portions of New York's statewide
achievement tests.
These studies show, consistently, that parental
schools of choice not controlled by
public school districts 1) are usually prohibited by law from screening out students based on admission exams, 2) use ability tracking less frequently than
traditional public schools even when, legally, they can, and 3) may use ability tracking, but when they do, it is less likely to have a negative effect on the
achievement of low - track students.
Despite the united front of opposition, with studies like Carol Klein's 2006 Virtual Charter
Schools and Home Schooling finding high levels of parent satisfaction and student achievement at virtual schools, it is highly unlikely that independent home schoolers and advocates for traditional public schools will be able to sto
Schools and Home
Schooling finding high levels of parent satisfaction and student
achievement at virtual
schools, it is highly unlikely that independent home schoolers and advocates for traditional public schools will be able to sto
schools, it is highly unlikely that independent home
schoolers and advocates for
traditional public schools will be able to sto
schools will be able to stop them.
Our results indicate that, on average, New York City's charter
schools raise their 3rd through 8th graders» math
achievement by 0.09 of a standard score and reading
achievement by 0.04 of a standard score, compared with what would have happened had they remained in
traditional public schools (see Figure 3).
Schools operated by Achievement First, for example, have helped their students gain an additional 125 days of learning in math and 57 days in English over traditional public s
Schools operated by
Achievement First, for example, have helped their students gain an additional 125 days of learning in math and 57 days in English over
traditional public schoolsschools.
The next step is to identify what's working in charter
schools that can be transferred back into the
traditional public schools to improve student
achievement.»
These patterns suggest that the positive effects of charter
school attendance on educational attainment are not due solely to measured differences in the
achievement of students in charter and
traditional public high
schools.
And, finally, do students who attend
traditional public schools subject to competition from charter
schools make larger
achievement gains than they would have in the absence of charter
schools?
We address three main questions: Do students attending charter
schools in these grades make larger or smaller gains in
achievement than they would have made in
traditional public schools?
The difference in the rate of
achievement growth between students enrolled in charter
schools and students in
traditional public schools is substantial.
Critiques like this do not deny that KIPP
schools improve the
achievement of the students who attend them, but rather argue that these improvements reflect advantageous enrollment patterns at KIPP that are not possible at
traditional public schools.
Charter
schools have the potential to have broader effects on student
achievement if
traditional public schools respond to the threat of losing students to charter
schools by improving the quality of their own education programs.
Students in these grades make considerably smaller
achievement gains in charter
schools than they would have in
traditional public schools, and the negative effects are not limited to
schools in their first year of operation.
Still, if North Carolina's
traditional public schools improved in response to their presence, the apparently negative effects of charter
schools on the
achievement of students who attend them could be offset by more positive statewide effects.
Whether these practices can be replicated in
traditional public schools or raise academic
achievement across the full range of
traditional public -
school students remains to be seen.
The key question is whether KIPP's positive effects on learning are attributable to a peer environment that is more conducive to academic
achievement than the peer environment found in
traditional public schools.
A study released earlier this month by Mathematica finds that students attending charter high
schools in Florida scored lower on
achievement tests than students in
traditional public schools, but years later, the charter students were more likely to have attended at least two years of college and also had higher earnings.
CREDO controlled for the unique characteristics of students enrolled in virtual charter
schools by comparing their performance to a «virtual twin,» a student with the same demographic characteristics and similar prior
achievement enrolled in a
traditional public school.
It alleges that a review of the research on charter
schools leads to the conclusions that, overall, charter
schools: 1) fail to raise student
achievement more than
traditional district
schools do; 2) aren't innovative and don't pass innovations along to district
schools; 3) exacerbate the racial and ethnic isolation of students; 4) provide a worse environment for teachers than district
schools; and 5) spend more on administration and less on instruction than
public schools.
The report is the first national study of the efficiency of charter
schools relative to
traditional public schools, and to tie funding to student
achievement.
Charters nationally are producing student
achievement gains that are very similar to the levels in
traditional public schools but receive about 30 percent less money per pupil.
Some advocates also stressed that charter -
school students were outperforming
traditional public -
school students on various measures of
achievement, a tactic used in Florida as well.
In general, charter
schools that serve low - income and minority students in urban areas are doing a better job than their
traditional public -
school counterparts in raising student
achievement, whereas that is not true of charter
schools in suburban areas.
By 2011, charter
schools were roughly equivalent to
traditional public schools in terms of their ability to raise academic
achievement.
But do charters vary more in terms of their ability to promote student
achievement than comparable
traditional public schools?
YES Prep
Public Schools, winner of the 2012 Broad Prize for Public Charter Schools, has an enviable academic track record: They've eliminated achievement gaps, achieved a 100 percent graduation rate with all students accepted into 4 - year colleges — plus they partner with local traditional public sc
Public Schools, winner of the 2012 Broad Prize for Public Charter Schools, has an enviable academic track record: They've eliminated achievement gaps, achieved a 100 percent graduation rate with all students accepted into 4 - year colleges — plus they partner with local traditional public s
Schools, winner of the 2012 Broad Prize for
Public Charter Schools, has an enviable academic track record: They've eliminated achievement gaps, achieved a 100 percent graduation rate with all students accepted into 4 - year colleges — plus they partner with local traditional public sc
Public Charter
Schools, has an enviable academic track record: They've eliminated achievement gaps, achieved a 100 percent graduation rate with all students accepted into 4 - year colleges — plus they partner with local traditional public s
Schools, has an enviable academic track record: They've eliminated
achievement gaps, achieved a 100 percent graduation rate with all students accepted into 4 - year colleges — plus they partner with local
traditional public sc
public schoolsschools.
(Update: For a review of systemic effect research — how expanded competition affects
achievement in
traditional public schools — see here.)
This evaluation addresses two specific questions: How does student
achievement in charter
schools compare with student
achievement in demographically similar,
traditional public schools?
Proponents contend that charter
schools expand educational choices for students, increase innovation, improve student
achievement, and promote healthy competition with
traditional public schools.
Second, the absence of effects on
achievement in nearby
traditional public schools suggests that the loss of students to charter
schools is not having negative
achievement effects on
traditional public schools, but it also suggests that charter
schools may not produce the hoped - for positive competitive effects in
traditional public schools.
The researchers examined student
achievement in
traditional public schools that had charter
schools nearby, and they found that the presence of the charter
schools did not appear to help or harm student
achievement in the
traditional public schools.
On average, charter
schools show higher
achievement than
traditional public schools, especially with traditionally underserved student groups and in urban environments.
Charter
schools do not appear to help or harm student
achievement in nearby
traditional public schools.
Charter
Schools, Achievers Early College Charter School, Camden, Coffee Break, growth, Individualized Education Program, Laura Waters, learning growth, local education agency, Mark Rynone, National Center for Special Education in Charter Schools, New Jersey, New Jersey Left Behind, New Jersey Special Education Collaborative, Newark, Newark Charter School Fund, NJ Left Behind, Paterson, Plainfield, School Choice, Special Education Medicaid Initiative, student achievement, student growth, student success, teacher effectiveness, teacher quality, The College of New Jersey, traditional public
Schools, Achievers Early College Charter
School, Camden, Coffee Break, growth, Individualized Education Program, Laura Waters, learning growth, local education agency, Mark Rynone, National Center for Special Education in Charter
Schools, New Jersey, New Jersey Left Behind, New Jersey Special Education Collaborative, Newark, Newark Charter School Fund, NJ Left Behind, Paterson, Plainfield, School Choice, Special Education Medicaid Initiative, student achievement, student growth, student success, teacher effectiveness, teacher quality, The College of New Jersey, traditional public
Schools, New Jersey, New Jersey Left Behind, New Jersey Special Education Collaborative, Newark, Newark Charter
School Fund, NJ Left Behind, Paterson, Plainfield,
School Choice, Special Education Medicaid Initiative, student
achievement, student growth, student success, teacher effectiveness, teacher quality, The College of New Jersey,
traditional public schoolsschools
For middle - and high -
school levels, the research team found that
achievement gains in charter
schools and
traditional public schools were about the same, with two exceptions.
Charter middle and high
schools produce test - score
achievement gains that are, on average, similar to those of
traditional public schools.
The RAND team found no evidence that charter
schools substantially affect
achievement in nearby
traditional public schools.
But the U.S. lags behind other developed countries in student
achievement, about 1 million students are on charter
school waiting lists nationwide, and many student groups are still underserved by all
public schools,
traditional and charter.
Students in KIPP
schools may be surrounded by classmates who are, on the whole, more supportive of academic
achievement than peers in
traditional public schools with similar poverty rates.
Students transferring to charter
schools had prior
achievement levels that were generally similar to or lower than those of their TPS [
traditional public school] peers.
Studies conducted by Mathematica Policy Research show that KIPP
schools achieve significantly greater gains in student
achievement than do
traditional public schools teaching similar students.
Also, while some might point to the fact that both programs show signs of helping lift
achievement in
traditional public schools a bit by increasing competition between
schools, I don't think anyone would argue that we should sacrifice the
achievement of students using vouchers in order to help others.
In the nations leading the world in student
achievement, the
schools look quite
traditional; and the classrooms in many of America's best
traditional public, charter
public, and private
schools look like they did 40 years ago.
Because these charters held a lottery to select their students, the research team could compare the
achievement of applicants who were admitted with a similar group who remained in a
traditional public school.
The authors examined the student
achievement data of each
school included in the turnaround initiatives — and in LPS, each
traditional public school in the district — to select
schools that have made notable academic gains since implementing these practices.
CLAIMS Charter
schools are marketed to the
public as incubators of innovation offering superior levels of student
achievement and college and career readiness when compared to
traditional public schools.
In spite of the sincere efforts that have been made to date to spur innovation in teaching and learning in the
traditional public school sector, the data show that just infusing more per - pupil
public school spending in the past has failed to propel the U.S. beyond its peer countries on international rankings of student
achievement.
Federal appropriations for programs that charters may not provide and gifts and grants specifically targeted toward
traditional public schools that support innovative methods to boost student
achievement could all be up for grabs by charter
schools, if House lawmakers concur with the Senate's changes to H539.