And on the specific claim the article makes that «half the charters perform only as well, or worse than, Detroit's traditional public schools» this is what the Stanford study has to say: «In reading, 47 percent of charter schools perform significantly better than
their traditional public school market, which is more positive than the 35 % for Michigan charter schools as a whole.
Not exact matches
And they deliver this
marketing via third party transactions that tap into student and family residential information that the DOE licenses, yet won't provide to
traditional public schools for the same purpose.
Specifically, it would move American higher education from a voucher - funded
market to a system with a free
public option much like
traditional K 12
public schools.
Despite the celebrity surrounding Rhee and Fenty, the
traditional public schools are still bleeding students, which is perhaps the ultimate,
market - driven judgment.
This remains a drop in the
public school bucket (nationally there were more than 94,000
public K — 12
schools and more than 49 million students in 2007), which is why «
market share» is considered a crucial milestone, one of the few ways to pinch
traditional schools in their pocketbooks.
The Cristo Rey
Schools» education - business model stands in stark contrast to the under - investment in human capital — of the traditional public school business model, or even traditional Catholic schools — and offers ways to address imperfections in the education
Schools» education - business model stands in stark contrast to the under - investment in human capital — of the
traditional public school business model, or even
traditional Catholic
schools — and offers ways to address imperfections in the education
schools — and offers ways to address imperfections in the education
market.
It's important, however, that you have someone, either internal or external, who understands what various channels of communication — sponsorships, advertising, social networking,
public relations,
traditional media, direct
marketing,
school publications, face - to - face contact, the
school website and
school events — are able to achieve.
Is the exploration of new
markets more prominent where
traditional public school systems have been resistant to change or where they have begun to incorporate charters into more diverse portfolio systems?
CLAIMS Charter
schools are
marketed to the
public as incubators of innovation offering superior levels of student achievement and college and career readiness when compared to
traditional public schools.
Charter
schools are
marketed to the
public as incubators of innovation offering superior levels of student achievement and college and career readiness when compared to
traditional public schools.
Parents generally arrived at their chosen
school through a largely linear process that began with the ruling out of large segments of the broader educational
market of
schools (e.g. ruling out all
traditional public schools based on prior negative experiences, ruling out the private sector due to financial constraints) followed by the identification of a particular
school through the parent's social network of family, friends and work colleagues.
Traditional MPS
schools that are fully accountable to the elected
school board and whose operations are completely transparent to the
public do not have the luxury, privately subsidized budget, or time to engage in
marketing of their
school, nor should they!
These important differences between charter
schools and
traditional public schools are not generally understood or appreciated by even the most knowledgeable people, which is why charter advocates put so much energy and resources in
marketing their operations as «
public»
schools.
Running Head: Principal turnover gap Work Environments and Labor
Markets: Explaining Principal Turnover Gap between Charter
Schools and
Traditional Public Schools
The charter concept is based on deep commitment to quality and equity;
schools of choice operating autonomously from
traditional districts can serve as incubators of innovation and leverage
market forces to ensure more students have access to exemplary
public schools.
The charter
school concept emerged from a deep commitment to quality and equity;
schools of choice operating autonomously from
traditional districts would serve as incubators of innovation and leverage
market forces to ensure more students could access exemplary
public schools.
If the trends hold, it means that the «
market share» for
traditional public schools will for the first time be less than 60 percent.
Furthermore, the authors note, as the charter movement gained momentum and other states passed similar laws, a more
market - driven vision of charter
schools emerged that emphasized competition as an incentive for
traditional public schools to improve, rather than the idea of charter - tested innovations that could boost
public school practices broadly.
Though
marketed as distinct from
traditional school vouchers, the ESA is simply different dressing on a familiar scheme to redirect
public taxpayer dollars to pay for private, unregulated, and unaccountable services.
Fourth, «The invisible hand of the
market was to be the solution primarily through charters and privatizing
schools... A growing body of literature shows that charter
schools do not perform better than
traditional public schools and they segregate
schools by race and by socio - economic status.»
Work environments and labor
markets: Explaining principal turnover gap between charter
schools and
traditional public schools.
Amenities: Street Lights, Boathouse: No Dock Or Boathouse, Cooling Source: Electric, Cooling Type: Central, Kitchen Equipment: Dishwasher, Kitchen Equipment: Garbage Disposal, ES Bus: Yes, Patio, Out Building, Fees Include: None, Fireplace Location: Family Room, Fireplace Type: Factory Built, HS Bus: Yes, Hardwood Floors, Wall - to - wall Carpet, Walk - in Closet, Kitchen: Solid Surface Counters, List Type: Exclusive Right To Sell, Lot Description: Level Lot, Lot Size: 2 - 1 Acre, MS Bus: Yes, Photo Available: YES, Ownership: Fee Simple, Photo: Broker Will Provide Photo, Parking: Parking Pad, Parking: 2 Car, Rooms: Great Room, SQFT Source:
Public Record, State: GA, Share Address with
Public Websites: Yes, Include in Auto - Valuation Models: Yes, Allow additional comments: Yes, Share with
Public Websites: Yes, Water:
Public Water, Equipment: Fire, Amenities: Pool, Cable In Street, Wet Bar, Energy Related: Thermo, Energy Related: Water Heater - gas, Kitchen: Breakfast Area, Kitchen: Walk - in Pantry, Lot Description: Wooded, Lot Description: Private Backyard, Fireplace Type: Gas Starter, Heating Source: Gas, Date Of Possession: Negotiable, Parking: Detached, Parking: Garage, Foyer - Entrance, Rooms: DR - Separate, Rooms: Office, Laundry Type: Room, Showing Instructions: Appt Owner, Style:
Traditional, Swift Entry: Yes, Water: Sewer Connected, Construction: Frame, Kitchen Equipment: Refrigerator, Lot Description: Cul De Sac, Rooms: Sun Room, Acreage Source:
Public Record, Garden Area, Accessibility: Garage Van Access, Amenities: Tennis Courts, Basement: Crawlspace,
Market Code: Available, Rooms: Dining Room Seats 12 +, Stories: Over 2 Stories, Parking: Rear Entrance, Amenities: Walk To Shopping, Heating Type: Other (See Remarks), Amenities: Clubhouse, Equipment: Satellite Dish, source: RETS, Skylight, Special Conditions: Agent Owned, Hot Tub, Accessibility: 32» Doors, Area: FUN1, Elementary
School: GA, High
School: GA, Middle
School: GA, High
School: Fulton County, Middle
School: Fulton County, Elementary
School: Fulton County