Andy Smarick opens The Urban School System of the Future with a depressing realization; «
The traditional urban school system is broken, and it can not be fixed.»
For years, conservatives properly accused
traditional urban school systems of being stubbornly resistant to change, but recent years have seen far more innovation in urban public education than in urban Catholic education.
Not exact matches
3) Superintendents like Paul Vallas, Joel Klein, and Tom Boasberg and a fast - growing number of
urban districts understand that the
traditional district
system is broken, have closed ineffective
schools and opened effective ones, and have committed to legal autonomy at the
school level and a bare - bones central office.
While Baltimore provides a cautionary tale for
urban district leaders implementing the portfolio strategy, it should not be seen as the death knell for reform within a
traditional school system.
A small number of progressive leaders of major
urban school systems are using
school closure and replacement to transform their long - broken districts: Under Chancellor Joel Klein, New York City has closed nearly 100
traditional public
schools and opened more than 300 new
schools.
As the
traditional urban school district is slowly replaced by a
system marked by an array of nongovernmental
school providers, new policies (undergirded by a new understanding of the government's role in public
schooling) are needed.
But a decade ago several trends in American education, and in the Catholic Church, made a Catholic - operated public
school seem increasingly possible: 1) the
traditional, parish - based Catholic
school system, especially in the inner cities, was crumbling; 2) equally troubled
urban public -
school systems were failing to educate most of their students; and 3) a burgeoning charter
school movement, born in the early 1990s, was beginning to turn heads among educators in both the private and public sectors.
The pockets of what Green, citing David Cohen, refers to as «coherent» teacher preparation initiatives are small and scattered, serving a small fraction of U.S.
schools and teachers, and operating largely outside of the
traditional public
schooling system built to serve the
urban poor and their suburban and rural neighbors.
In The
Urban School System of the Future, Andy Smarick contends that the traditional structure of urban public education has failed, and that it must be replaced with an entirely new one defined by choice and competi
Urban School System of the Future, Andy Smarick contends that the
traditional structure of
urban public education has failed, and that it must be replaced with an entirely new one defined by choice and competi
urban public education has failed, and that it must be replaced with an entirely new one defined by choice and competition.
Public charter
schools, funded with public dollars and tuition - free, are off - shoots of
traditional public
school systems and been glorified recently in critically - acclaimed documentaries like «The Lottery» and «Waiting for Superman,» which portray the
schools as last hopes for parents raising children in
urban areas with sub-standard
schools.
Public charter
schools, funded with public dollars and tuition - free, are off - shoots of
traditional public
school systems recently glorified in critically - acclaimed documentaries like «The Lottery» and «Waiting for Superman,» which portray the
schools as last hopes for parents raising children in
urban areas with sub-standard
schools.
An early 2017 piece by freelancer George Joseph blamed charter
schools for fueling
urban school resegregation, downplaying the enormous role of the
traditional education
system (and belittling the decisions of black and brown parents who choose charter
schools).