And so, paying up is often required — well, at least from
a traditional value perspective — which, almost inevitably needs to be justified via comprehensive study of the company & its management, its capital allocation, its products & business model, its industry dynamics, and (most of all) whether it enjoys a significant, sustainable & (ideally) an expanding competitive advantage (i.e. an economic moat).
Not exact matches
In the
traditional understanding, Nature was looked upon with a utilitarian
perspective without consideration for its intrinsic
value.
From this
perspective, contemporary social issue disputes, such as that over abortion, are not temporary aberrations, but rather the stuff of future politics, where an agenda of «
traditional values» confronts an agenda of «personal liberation» or what Ronald Inglehart has called, somewhat misleadingly, «postmaterial»
values.
Although I want to discuss the role of comprehensive systems of
value and ways of life in education, my
perspective is that of one formed in a
traditional religious community.
These efforts occur in ways that allow students — or in our case, youths and pre-service teachers — to demonstrate creativity and have their
perspectives valued in ways that few middle - or high - school lessons (and maybe even fewer
traditional teacher education clinical experiences) enable.
When schools approach OER from this
perspective, they often fail to recognize the
value of innovative systems for deploying OER in a personalized way, such as Summit's PLP or Gooru's Navigator, and instead look for OER resources that work more like
traditional textbooks, such as the Engage New York resources.
From an economic
perspective, many
value firms are in
traditional businesses such as manufacturing, industrial production and financial services.
The research report captures the preferences and
perspectives of
traditional multi-brand smartphone retailers around «
Value for Money» (< INR 10,000) Smartphone segment.