Reinhold claims that
a tragic view of history is necessary to help the Christian negotiate the gap between the ethical ideal and the possibilities attainable by human collective action.
As we celebrate the day of the resurrection, we are reminded both of
the tragic view of history and of time's being caught up into the more of the eighth day.
Not exact matches
At the core
of this
view of progress is a failure to reckon with the
tragic in
history — the body will decay, strength will fail, life will disappoint, nations will fall.
It is understandable why the New York Times's Editorial Board would conclude that Christians
view sinners as inferior — the
tragic history of Christianity, even within our own country, offers many examples
of Christians who have used sin as an excuse to dehumanize, discriminate, and hate others.
This is a
tragic view of human
history set over against a progressive
view.
If this can be done we shall have passed beyond the crisis
of liberal Christianity; for the liberal
view of the relation
of Christian love to moral problems is in difficulty today precisely because the philosophy
of history on which it is based does not sufficiently recognize the
tragic obstacles which are set in the way
of the life
of love.
Both appeal to the
tragic character
of human
history to support their
views, yet each draws a radically different conclusion.
We fail in our responsibility to
history when we do not permit ourselves to see Civil War memorials from a Romantic point
of view, and when we fail to recognize the phrase «lost cause» as a shorthand for a morally complex,
tragic understanding
of the South's defeat.