Sentences with phrase «transfer at market value»

Not exact matches

Mr. Low's spokesman said this year that the transfers to Mr. Aziz were done at fair market value and at arm's length.

«Amazon has algorithms and crawlers that go out and find the lowest prices and create this giant sucking sound, and they've taken it offline and effectively created a transfer in value from taxpayers to Amazon,» said Scott Galloway, professor of marketing at New York University's Stern School of Business told CNBC on Thursday.

Investments — Investments are entirely comprised of various cryptocurrencies and are reported at fair value as determined by digital asset market exchanges with realized gains and losses calculated on a trade data basis as the difference between the fair value and cost of cryptocurrencies transferred.

This could disrupt the global remittance market, valued at $ 514 billion in 2012, by providing a less expensive method for direct transfers globally.8 Current providers may be forced to lower fees or be replaced by entrants like BitPesa, a mobile payment application for Bitcoin in the developing world.

A look at the twenty worst signings by Premier League clubs this season in terms of value for money, with Manchester United and Liverpool particularly culpable in the transfer market with some shocking buys last summer...

The arrival of Cech demonstrated the value of signing finished products, rather than waiting for players to mature at the Emirates Stadium, and Wenger is understood to be thawing on his erstwhile approach to the transfer market.

The Argentine star has never commanded a high transfer fee due to his development from the Barcelona youth team, but after his world class displays over the last few years, in which he has helped the club win every trophy possible, he would be valued at around # 105million in today's transfer market.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

If anyone is silly enough to take anything that Wenger says at face value then you have been in a coma for the better part of 10 years or simply a season ticket holder that gladly renews each year in May when the talking heads from corporate Arsenal start their usual blather about the transfer market and the inevitable success that lies ahead... stop talking Wenger and start doing the very things you and the rest of the suits keep spewing each and every year... just imagine how amazing this squad would be if we even did half the things that Gazidis claimed we would or if Wenger found a way to sign even a third of the players he said he could... that's exactly what Arsenal has become a «would have» «could have» club

He is currently valued at around # 45m by Monaco, who are trying to take advantage of Arsenal's desperation and get the most they can for him, however, even at that prize, he is still going to be a bargain buy if you put into consideration his age and the current inflation in the transfer market.

much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..

Offering Oscar, therefore, would see the price - tag drop considerably with the Brazilian's current market value at # 35.2 m [via Transfer Markt].

Most Liverpool fans thought Mohamed Salah would be good when Liverpool signed him last summer from Roma in a # 38M deal — even if some weren't entirely sure at the time whether that was a fee that represented especially good value in a market that hadn't yet seen PSG trigger Neymar's release clause and send transfer inflation into the stratosphere.

I believe that Arsenal's offer is much closer to my real value in the transfer market at the moment.»

For what Zaha wil cost in the British transfer market, I think that Arsene Wenger would be better advise to steal a march on all the other cubs watching Isco of Malaga, valued at about # 12m - # 15m I think it would be excellent business and hopefully with Carzola already at Arsenal it could influenece his choice.

While some teams have spent big money to acquire quality players many teams may be looking for more value in the market as seen in previous seasons with players such as Michu for a measly # 2m, or Demba Ba who proved to be a hit at Tyneside after arriving on a free transfer.

The Italy international has a market transfer value of at least # 48million and manager Antonio Conte wants him to strengthen the defensive department.

The «charitable remainder» portion of the trust — that which ultimately will benefit the School Nutrition Association and its members through the School Nutrition Foundation — must be at least 10 % of the initial fair market value of the assets irrevocably transferred to the trust.

It is important to note that the transfer of any investments (such as equities) is done at current fair market value.

This will create a tax issue since you'll be deemed to have sold the place at fair market value at the time you transfer ownership.

Normally for tax purposes when property is transferred from one person to another it is done at fair market value when the transfer is made.

If one family member transfers capital assets like stocks to another family member, except for an inter-spousal transfer, the transaction is deemed to take place at fair market value.

Future growth in the shares would be taxable to the grandchildren, with the grandchild's adjusted cost base for tax purposes being the fair market value at the time of transfer.

This is because when you transfer an asset to a third party — or any part thereof — even if money hasn't changed hands, you are generally deemed to have sold it at fair market value.

In the case of a private company, assets are transferred at current fair market value for shares of equal value in the private company; the heirs become shareholders and their wealth rises as the shares rise, while the founder's shares no longer rise in value.

So, in this case, if grandparents transferred common shares to their grandchildren, it would be as if the grandparents sold the assets at the current market value.

If a parent gifts an adult - child real estate, the CRA considers this transfer of ownership as a disposition: a virtual sale of the property at fair market value.

Vanguard receives your investments at the market value on the date of the transfer.

Ownership transfer can occur between two individuals at the policy's fair market value or CSV, with the taxable gain expressed as follows:

The fair market value at the time of transfer is used to determine the amount of the RRIF withdrawal and the TFSA contribution.

Should their fair market value at the time of the transfer exceed your cost, the difference must be reported as a capital gain.

ASC 820 «Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures» defines fair value as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid upon the transfer of a liability (i.e., the «exit price») in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available.&rValue Measurements and Disclosures» defines fair value as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid upon the transfer of a liability (i.e., the «exit price») in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available.&rvalue as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid upon the transfer of a liability (i.e., the «exit price») in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available.&rvalue that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available.»

These transfers are generally deemed to occur at fair market value (FMV), with capital gains tax payable accordingly.

Assuming a qualified transferee agrees to accept the transfer before the end of 2014, can I still deduct the fair market value at time of transfer for 2014's AGI?

Your transaction is considered a transfer to a registered account and the assets will be deemed to have been disposed of (sold) at their fair market value.

However for assets with a defined market value there is usually just a small discount applied to the market price at transfer, something on the order of 5 %.

This will generally take place at its original cost, unless you make a special election to transfer it at a value between the cost and the fair market value.

«The unrealized gains will be deemed to be nil and the donor would be entitled to the donation tax credit based on the fair market value of the property at the time of transfer.»

Given the significant increases in land and quota values over the last number of years it is becoming increasingly difficult to transfer the family farm at fair market value and meet the cash requirements of paying farm debt, repaying of the parents» investment, paying income tax on the farm operations, investing in additional farm operations and upgrades, and provide a living for the children.

If the transfer takes place at a price above cost, (but less than fair market value) the capital gains exemption can be utilized up to a maximum lifetime amount of $ 750,000 per transferor.

But, when Canadian residents die, they are deemed to dispose of all of their capital property at fair market value, unless the property transfers to a spouse or a spousal trust.

The efficient market is hard at work transferring the RHG's shares from those on high tax rates who prefer discounted capital gains (such as myself and John Kinghorn) to those who value the franking credits (mostly super funds in pension mode).

I would peg the grey market trade value of VX bookings at 1.6:1 (for a 15,000 point elevate booking something around a 25,000 MR transfer should make it happen).

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

An asset sale will require additional documentation of the assets being transferred over at fair market value and non-arm's length.

This is a market ripe for disruption from bitcoin, which excels at making international transfers of value speedily and cheaply.

Whether a spouse transferred or disposed of property at less than market value in anticipation of the divorce.

Brokers involved in selling either personal or business real estate for such owners need to be certain that they don't get involved in fraudulent transfers where assets are sold at much less than market value to avoid possible seizure.

In case of a trust deed the general answer may have to be yes, you need not partner to be on the same trust deed, one can be in a first position and one in the second position... or is there adequate value (i.e. including assets that could be liquidated without incurring a penalized loss - different from market loss) in each ones SDIRA to independently complete the transaction... or are funds available in other IRA's at other institutions that could be transferred to this SDIRA..