Atletico Madrid want a deal but
their transfer ban means a transfer is not possible.
Those two factors should ensure Atletico are competitive although there are caveats: one is that
their transfer ban means any new signings, including perhaps Diego Costa, can not join until January; there also remains the unknown quantity of how quickly they settle into the shiny new Wanda Metropolitano stadium.
«Raphael Varane or Virgil van Dijk would be ideal at centre - back and Alexandre Lacazette is the striker I wanted and hopefully the Atletico Madrid
transfer ban means we've got a chance.
Not exact matches
For one thing, the Catalan club are still under a
transfer ban which
means that Turan can not play for them until January and so will probably play the first of of the season with his former club and that could
mean that Atletico wait until then to sign a replacement.
As mentioned it could be a
transfer ban (i did nt
mean there was), It could be a fine (To bring it up on such a scale would
mean a heafty one) or even points deduction.
The FIFA Appeal Committee has rejected Barcelona's
transfer ban appeal,
meaning the Catalan giant wont be able to sign any player until 2016.
Atletico were wary of losing Griezmann as a
transfer ban on the club
meant they couldn't sign a replacement.
Barcelona were
banned for two
transfer windows this afternoon, January 2015 and the summer
transfer window of 2015,
meaning Barcelona will...
FIFA have agreed to lift Barcelona's
transfer ban,
meaning the Spanish side are free to buy and sell players this summer.
While Atletico Madrid are the favourites to sign Costa, they are currently under a
transfer ban which would
mean that he could not be registered until 1st January 2018.
Some countries are investigating bitcoin as a growing commodity market, some take the same stance as the US declaring them assets, and some have explicitly
banned their use for
transfer of goods or services (though the
means of enforcing those
bans are limited).