Sentences with phrase «transfer equation for»

Not exact matches

Although it's virtually impossible to keep adrenaline out of the equation completely when making a transfer, especially for first time parents, here are some things you can do to ensure that the transfer is as smooth as possible.

For added crawling ability, Kleinstein added an additional Toyota transfer case to the equation.

While many basic aspects of physics can be included (conservation of mass, energy etc.), many need to be approximated for reasons of efficiency or resolutions (i.e. the equations of motion need estimates of sub-gridscale turbulent effects, radiative transfer codes approximate the line - by - line calculations using band averaging), and still others are only known empirically (the formula for how fast clouds turn to rain for instance).

The amount of energy absorbed depends on the temperature of the absorber, shown to be true by the stefan - boltzmann equation for net transfer of heat.

(Even for a relatively simple example of a gray medium, calculating the equilibrium temperature profile within a homogeneous slab involves a singular Fredholm integral equation of the second kind as described by M. N. Ozisik in Radiative Transfer (1973).)

For idealized GCMs, we use the FMS dynamical core (that is, the basic numerical schemes FMS provides for the hydrostatic primitive equations), with various idealizations for the lower boundary conditions, for radiative transfer, and for moist or dry convectiFor idealized GCMs, we use the FMS dynamical core (that is, the basic numerical schemes FMS provides for the hydrostatic primitive equations), with various idealizations for the lower boundary conditions, for radiative transfer, and for moist or dry convectifor the hydrostatic primitive equations), with various idealizations for the lower boundary conditions, for radiative transfer, and for moist or dry convectifor the lower boundary conditions, for radiative transfer, and for moist or dry convectifor radiative transfer, and for moist or dry convectifor moist or dry convection.

is, in the circumstances, gravely damaging to him, since it suggests that he repudiates (for instance) such proven scientific results as the fundamental equation of radiative transfer.

Require more rigorous educational standards for the GCM modelers in the areas of Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics and non-linear differential equations.

At basic level, It falls out of the equations for radiative transfer if you increase a greenhouse gas.

For myself, I call into question not the «basic radiative transfer physics» but the completeness and accuracy of the atmospheric models: all of the equations are approximations, the response of clouds to CO2 increase and warming are not well known, yet AGW proponents act as though a slight increase in temp following a long increase in CO2 is a sure thing.

For most geometries, the mathematics is too unwieldy (at least for me) to generate a closed - form equation for the rate of energy transfFor most geometries, the mathematics is too unwieldy (at least for me) to generate a closed - form equation for the rate of energy transffor me) to generate a closed - form equation for the rate of energy transffor the rate of energy transfer.

And for the purists, the equation as shown relies on the temperature not changing as a result of the small transfer of energy.

Robert Essenhigh Prediction of the Standard Atmosphere Profiles of Temperature, Pressure, and Density with Height for the Lower Atmosphere by Solution of the (S − S) Integral Equations of Transfer and Evaluation of the Potential for Profile Perturbation by Combustion Emissions Energy Fuels, 2006, 20 (3), pp 1057 — 1067 DOI: 10.1021 / ef050276y

The direct radiative forcing calculation is based on an empiric al equation derived from well - established atmospheric radiative energy transfer models and serves as a first - order proxy for global warming impact.»

see fred «'' Jeff, the 1C value for a forcing of 3.7 W / m ^ 2 (the canonical value for doubled CO2 based on radiative transfer equations and spectroscopic data) is derived by differentiating the Stefan - Boltzmann equation that equates flux (F) to a constant (sigma) x the fourth power of temperature.

This is described by the equation for conductive heat transfer, which in (relatively) plain English says:

It's also the case that the results for the radiative transfer equations will have a certain amount of error using «band models» compared with the «line by line» (LBL) codes for all trace gases.

Researchers project future climate using climate models — computer - based numerical simulations that use the equations for fluid dynamics and energy transfer to represent atmospheric weather patterns and ocean circulation.

Well, the only way to work out the «expected» results — or what the theory predicts — is to solve the radiative transfer equations (RTE) for that vertical profile through the atmosphere.

Further, I repeat that none of the heat transfer equations have an input for back radiation.

Can you tell me what is wrong with the standard solution of the equations for radiative transfer in the atmosphere and how you know this and where you are planning to publish it?

There is no input for back radiation in any heat transfer equation so taking as if it does something can not be shown via standard equations.

So the conclusion (furthermore the equation has a term for the emissivity of the object and no term for the emissivity of the surroundings or the absorptiveness of the object, both of which would be required if the surroundings were transferring energy to the object.)

To compute what happens quantitatively, one must solve the equations for radiative transfer absorption - line by absorption - line through the atmosphere.

People write down heat equations for the ocean but then they pretend that they're not really talking about molecular heat transfer but some sort of effective heat transfer so they use much larger thermal diffusion coefficients than the molecular ones.

With sufficient warming, the same radiative transfer equations show that upward IR will rise enough for sufficient quantities to escape to space, albeit at a higher altitude than before, warmed sufficiently so that its IR emissivity allows OLR to balance incoming absorbed radiation.

Even though Wikipedia does not state it explicitly, they should, a surface reflecting its own radiation back onto itself also logically applies and must never be expected to transfer energy, for that one surface's temperature is both temperatures used in the equation and therefore ΔT is always zero, so the flux back to itself is always zero.

Jeff, the 1C value for a forcing of 3.7 W / m ^ 2 (the canonical value for doubled CO2 based on radiative transfer equations and spectroscopic data) is derived by differentiating the Stefan - Boltzmann equation that equates flux (F) to a constant (sigma) x the fourth power of temperature.