Having received the parachute payments and sizeable
transfer fees for players like Charlie Adam, replaced by cheaper alternatives, the Seasiders» slide since Ian Holloway's departure is a cautionary tale.
this plan will cost us champions league football next season for sure then we'll be paying manu sized
transfer fees for players next summer transfer window — so false econoomy!!
I just looked up Chelsea's
transfer fees for players like Willian, Oscar, Costa, Hazard, Cesc it was mind boggling.
Newcastle United winger Hatem Ben Arfa has agreed a return to Ligue 1 «in principle» after talks with divisional strugglers OGC Nice, report the Telegraph, but the deal will only go through if the Magpies do not demand
a transfer fee for a player whose relationship with the club seems to be at breaking point.
However, the report in The Sun suggesting that it was the Lyon forward Alexandre Lacazette that Wenger and Gazidis were in France for seems a lot more believable, with
the transfer fee for this player said to be more like # 50 million.
Not exact matches
Outside, name 3 top English
players who went
for a big
transfer fees and made it big?
The Reds have already signed two
players, adding teenage striker Dominic Solanke from Chelsea
for a
fee which will be determined by a tribunal, before breaking their
transfer record to recruit Egyptian winger Mohamed Salah from Roma
for # 36.9 m, as reported by The Guardian.
It remains to be seen what the
fee for Nathan's
transfer will be, but it looks as though he will become the latest of many
players on the books at Chelsea to go out on loan at a young age.
Nevertheless, a
player of his standing on and off the pitch would be a huge coup
for Chelsea if such a move were to materialise, although with no mention of a
transfer fee or whether or not his wage demands could be met by the Blues, it seems like it's still a long way off from becoming a reality.
Of course, as with most
players, if some club is willing to pay a ridiculously high
transfer fee for Ox........
And its not like Wenger bought such poor
players by choice, thats what his money could afford him, think about it... not long ago, a mere 16 million euros that was used in the acquisition of carzola was our record
transfer fee when other teams bought
players for fees in excess of 30 mil every season!
For the fact that the pay huge
transfer fees does not make their
players extraordinary.
The
players about to be mentioned all went
for crazily inflated
transfer fees, based on what they'd actually achieved in their careers at that point.
I think we should make a statement of intent and smash the world record
fee by signing Mbappe we have 150m
for transfers Mbappe alone and keeping our star
players is enough business
With
transfer fees continually on the rise and this summer seeing some crazy prices paid
for players, such as the signing of rumoured Arsenal
transfer target Gonzalo Higuain by Italian champions Juventus and the crazy money set to be shelled out by Manchester United
for their former youth star Paul Pogba, is this why Arsenal have made just one big
transfer so far?
Ibrahimovic is the most expensive footballer in the world, in terms of
transfer fees exchanged
for a
player, claimed that the disagreement was born out of him outshining Lionel Messi, who was having a difficult season.
Any move to sign Cavani however will require Liverpool to break their
transfer record with PSG likely to demand a
fee close to the # 52m they paid
for the
player back in July 2013.
Neuer's contract is set to expire in the summer of 2012, meaning that Schalke may be willing to sell him in one of the next two
transfer windows in order to generate a
fee for the
player, and given his impressive performances throughout the 2010 World Cup in South Africa, the leading clubs of Europe will surely have taken notice.
If an increase in salary is only going to cost 5 - 7 % of the allowed wage structure than I say sure do it as it would cost more to pay a
transfer fee and a new salary
for a
player matching the caliber of either
player.
The report claims that the Red Devils have agreed terms with the
player and are now negotiating with the Portuguese giants to decide on an exact
fee for the
transfer.
Leaving
for Lyon could be a preferred choice
for Arsenal in a swap
player plus less
transfer fee payment
for transferring Lacazette to Arsenal if Arsenal truly want him and Giroud wants to go there.
Personally, I couldn't care
for brand named
player's or big
transfer fees!
Once the summer
transfer window shut, I said to my friends «in January Wenger will sign an unknown youngster
for a small
fee, and more experienced
player for the squad, but not
for the starting line - up».
Although with that being said granted that he is a premier league
player we would have to adjust
for inflation, so he will definitely command a
transfer fee exceeding # 45 Million however from our perspective with us looking to offload a few of our
players, who retrospectively are being looked at by Everton Ospina, Walcott, Gibbs, Ox and Campbell it would provide us with the perfect opportunity to launch a bid upwards of # 40 Million and a
player exchange I may be getting ahead of myself but f we were to get rid of any of those guys I'd rather it be in a deal to a team, that couldn't provide a threat to our title ambitions whilst it simultaneously being a deal that advantages all parties.
Maybe you are right but of the rumoured 150M we still have payment commitments from previous
transfers that have not been completed, then wages which will be a big issue since a 40 - 60M
player will probably be on 180 - 200k, also we will most likely be getting a reject like James Rodriguez or Turan since we are out of the champions league and if they are on the same level as ozil then we might as well not bother with them, then add onto the fact it may not be easy to get rid of our unwanted
players like Walcott
for example who will pay his 140k ontop of a 20M
transfer fee?
The 25 - year - old's announcement follows the news that Stoke have agreed a
fee with Wolves
for the
transfer of winger Michael Kightly and, with forward Matt Jarvis also coveted by a host of the Premier League clubs, new boss Stale Solbakken could face losing three of his most talented
players in quick succession.
Man United boss Louis van Gaal is lining up a January offer
for highly rated winger Zakaria Bakkali with PSV Eindhoven likely to accept offers
for the teenager when the
transfer window re-opens to avoid the possibility of losing the
player for a nominal compensatory
fee when his current contract ends next summer.
Good enough that VfL Wolfsburg paid $ 20 million to sign him last summer, the highest
transfer fee ever paid
for an American
player.
With the 25 year old in his final year at Toulouse, the ball is very much in his court and realistically you'd expect Toulouse would want to get some sort of
fee for their
player, rather than lose him on a free
transfer next year.
Liverpool's season could be about to get a great deal worse as reports from Spain suggest the Reds are now ready to accept a lower
transfer fee from Barcelona
for star
player Philippe Coutinho.
Arsenal had been negotiating with Basel
for the last 8 months
for Elneny and his
transfer fee is said to be more than the reported
fee (# 7 million) the true cost is kept between the two clubs so that Basel don't get held to ransom when they enter the swiss market to buy
players.
All of Wenger's disastrous plans when it comes to
transfers, both incoming and outgoing, are coming home to roost... why would anyone pay a significant
fee for a
player that was hardly used, is overpaid and has a spotty injury record; not to mention the fact that Wenger nickels & dimes everyone when it comes to
transfers so it only makes sense that other teams would do likewise when dealing with us... the fact is I wouldn't be surprised if Wenger does this so that
players won't be moved thereby giving him a ready - made excuse not to spend more money on
transfers; there's a reason why the latest headlines regarding Arsenal
transfers seem to suggest that we aren't bringing anyone in until some
players are sold or moved elsewhere on loan... we know this club knows how to utilize press coverage to further their questionable agendas, it's the very reason why the Sanchez situation has become such a nightmare
They note that it will be a new record
transfer fee received by the Blues
for one of their
players.
Talking of selling
players sell sanchez but to juve psg or bayern etc
for a lower
transfer fee than city will offer.
You don't get it do you?I'm not even talking about the money.But I agree with you that
for the kind of money that will be spent on Mbappe it's a higher gamble.Henry was bought to be a starter and as the main man
for Arsenal.He was so young by then and the pressure on him was massive.Looking at the impact he's had in our club if Henry had failed who would imagine what Arsene would have done.To me he's our best
player ever.Arsene put a lot of trust in him to be honest but the gamble paid off.However, I think he had a point to prove to world and to Juve hence he succeeded.The same as is with Mbappe with even a higher
transfer fee and more expectation.If he's ever signed
for that amount he's coming here to be the main man whowill send us into glory.Forget Ozchez
for all eyes will be on him.
The point is that thanks to this we are now in a better position, instead of being left
for dead completely by Man City and Chelsea and their unlimited resources we will now be able to buy
players commanding
transfer fees like Sanchez or Ozil every season or two, we achieved this while staying in the Champions League year after year.
So I don't know if you are aware of it or not but, according to various sources in the news Mesut Ozil, is the prime target
for Juventus this
transfer window... It seems so strange, this is the first time in a while our main
players have been subject to
transfer rumours and we haven't even deemed them as a credible threat... anyway the
fee currently being proposed is around # 31.5 Million pounds which would mean a 11 million loss on our original investment.
# 15 million may seem like a lot
for a
player of Szczesny's calibre and especially
for a goalkeeper, however let's not forget some of the crazy prices that are flying around the
transfer market nowadays and so demanding such a
fee isn't entirely unrealistic from Arsenal.
Pogba isn't worth # 89 million but he is a good
player too Strangely, the
Transfer fee for both Mkitharyan and Ibrahimovic was # 26 million (# 26 mil plus # 0).
Both
players seem unhappy at their current clubs and would probably command a similar
transfer fee of at least # 40 million plus, but who would you go
for?
8 million in
transfer fee and around 40,000 per week in wages is not a gamble in my opinion
for a
player who possesses world class potential.
From youngsters like Neymar and Harry Kane to less expensive veterans like Zlatan, Man United can land the high - quality
player they want while getting a lot more value
for their
transfer fee.
If you look at the First Five Years of the last decade Wenger at least managed to qualify
for the Champions League in each of those seasons.The Second Five Years have clearly shown we as a Club have gone backwards and spiralling in a downward descent.And in these Five Years we have spent MORE money on
transfer fees and
player wages than at any time in the Clubs history.
Totally agree, there is a huge list of
players that went
for huge
transfer fees that ended up disappointing their new employees.
We are or will go all in
for a big name
player which will cost big in both
transfer fee and wage.
However, it's added by the Express that he has a # 25m release clause which would certainly be appealing to interested parties as that would arguably be a snip
for an established
player of his quality with his goalscoring record at such a high level in today's market given the
transfer fees we've seen in recent times, and so it remains to be seen what the future holds
for Mertens.
It's then possible to make a case
for every
player to leave
for some reason injury, age, unhappy, not good enough or large
transfer fee offer etc..
I agree with Wenger's point that «Big»
players can be bought
for transfer fees that are not big, and a few hidden gems turn out to be big
players despite not costing much, but it's only a few.
The report notes that while Real were keen to recoup a big
fee for Bale during the summer
transfer window just gone, they are now ready to lower their demands
for the
player.
Norwich have had two bids
for Hooper turned down by Celtic — the first a # 5million offer and the second the same
transfer fee with Welsh international Steve Morison thrown in as part of a
player - plus - cash deal.