Sentences with phrase «transfer fees for players like»

Having received the parachute payments and sizeable transfer fees for players like Charlie Adam, replaced by cheaper alternatives, the Seasiders» slide since Ian Holloway's departure is a cautionary tale.

I just looked up Chelsea's transfer fees for players like Willian, Oscar, Costa, Hazard, Cesc it was mind boggling.

Not exact matches

Nevertheless, a player of his standing on and off the pitch would be a huge coup for Chelsea if such a move were to materialise, although with no mention of a transfer fee or whether or not his wage demands could be met by the Blues, it seems like it's still a long way off from becoming a reality.

And its not like Wenger bought such poor players by choice, thats what his money could afford him, think about it... not long ago, a mere 16 million euros that was used in the acquisition of carzola was our record transfer fee when other teams bought players for fees in excess of 30 mil every season!

Maybe you are right but of the rumoured 150M we still have payment commitments from previous transfers that have not been completed, then wages which will be a big issue since a 40 - 60M player will probably be on 180 - 200k, also we will most likely be getting a reject like James Rodriguez or Turan since we are out of the champions league and if they are on the same level as ozil then we might as well not bother with them, then add onto the fact it may not be easy to get rid of our unwanted players like Walcott for example who will pay his 140k ontop of a 20M transfer fee?

The point is that thanks to this we are now in a better position, instead of being left for dead completely by Man City and Chelsea and their unlimited resources we will now be able to buy players commanding transfer fees like Sanchez or Ozil every season or two, we achieved this while staying in the Champions League year after year.

# 15 million may seem like a lot for a player of Szczesny's calibre and especially for a goalkeeper, however let's not forget some of the crazy prices that are flying around the transfer market nowadays and so demanding such a fee isn't entirely unrealistic from Arsenal.

From youngsters like Neymar and Harry Kane to less expensive veterans like Zlatan, Man United can land the high - quality player they want while getting a lot more value for their transfer fee.

Arsene Wenger does like a bargain, as every Arsenal fan knows all too well, and getting a quality player without having to pay a single penny, or Eurp as the case may be, in transfer fees is certainly a bargain, so I reckon that the Arsenal boss will be having a good long think about the news, reported by the Spanish Catalan sports paper Sport that FC Barcelona are willing to let their Turkish international Arda Turan go for nothing.

Maybe so when you look at the transfer fees paid by Man City for players like De Bruyne, Sterling and Mangala and the silly money spent by Man United on the likes of Angel Di Maria and Anthony Martial, but a report in the Daily Mail tells a different story.

To be fair to Arsene Wenger and the Arsenal board, a transfer fee of # 10 million does not sound like too much to ask for a player with the pace and technical ability that Kieran Gibbs has and the experience that being an England international with nearly 150 Premier League games and close to 50 in the Champions League brings with it.

However, the report in The Sun suggesting that it was the Lyon forward Alexandre Lacazette that Wenger and Gazidis were in France for seems a lot more believable, with the transfer fee for this player said to be more like # 50 million.

This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?

They have so much money to spend that it doesn't matter if a transfer fee for a certain player seems like a massive overpay.

There will be the guy that hates the board and will repeatedly accuses them of penny - pinching / misleading / talking to media too much / not giving supporters enough information; another who is adamant that we are paying well over the odds for every player linked (as if the transfer fee was coming out of his own pocket); and the bloke that doesn't like or want us to do business with certain other clubs.

The 20 - year - old French attacker looks like he will be leaving Marseille to join Arsenal for a transfer fee worth around # 13.5 m. I'm usually quite careful not to make unrealistic statements about players joining or leaving the club -LSB-...]

Ronaldo's petulance when not being able to score has been well documented, while Gareth Bale looks like a shadow of the player who was signed for a world record transfer fee from Tottenham in 2013.

The Sun has reported that Sandro would most likely cost around # 70 million, which is a massive transfer fee for a left - back — one which will see the media criticise the club for spending another big chunk of cash with teams like Manchester City having a ceiling price for a player and seemingly make these options work.

Liverpool decided to bring in Virgil van Dijk for a world record transfer fee — for a defender — of # 75 million — in order to finally replace players like Daniel Agger.