They are a fabulous way of
transferring tacit knowledge in our firms — encouraging that all - important active learning to cultivate the deep smarts.
Not exact matches
«Lower - quality inventions are more likely to be
transferred for a given amount of
tacit knowledge.»
«If you have a very high - quality invention» — that is, one with great market potential — «and the associated
tacit knowledge is very difficult to
transfer, you're more likely to become an entrepreneur,» he explains.
the first we went in for lemar we tried 30m then 40m then mid 40m (or a figure near to it) then all of a sudden we try 90m + which shows that our
tacit approach to
transfers is disingenuous and its an approach thats all wrong.
So practice remains
tacit; not explicated and articulated, invisible and difficult to
transfer.
There are, however, strong
tacit knowledge
transfer activities such as mentoring (in Canada, called articling) and communities of practice (in law, known as practice groups) that do exist.
Seriously though, there are many ways to formalize
tacit knowledge
transfer that already happens in informal ways.
It is neat that this kind of
tacit transfer is being encouraged by public libraries.