Sentences with phrase «transfers ownership of the copyright»

While many traditional - publishing contracts these days contain «life of copyright» clauses, those don't transfer ownership of the copyright — the publisher does not own one's work.

In this way, hybrid differs from traditional publishing; because, in a traditional publishing contract, the author legally transfers ownership of the copyright to the publisher.

For any submitted photos, I represent and warrant that I took the photos myself, own the copyright, and have not transferred ownership of the copyright to any other person or entity

Not exact matches

The ownership of copyright's exclusive rights and transfers of those rights are important for authors and companies.

Copyright ownership is retained by author with all publication methods, unless the author is either really naive, or savvy enough to get paid a LOT of money to transfer all rights.

At the end of the project, Parreno and Huyghe transferred Annlee's copyright to a foundation belonging to her alone, bringing an end to the project but giving her legal ownership of her own image.

(There is another way, «operation of law», which applies to cases like companies being bought, or estate transfer, etc.) But you are correct that you can't simply assert copyright ownership.

While the information is sometimes limited, especially if you want to look for transfers of intellectual property ownership, it is an excellent starting point for any copyright search.

Since there is no initial transfer of ownership in the typical case of software licensing, the relevance of copyright law is that it establishes the basis for prohibiting you from using the software.

The US Copyright Office interprets that as meaning that authors have equal rights to the work (an undivided ownership share): in other words, any author can grant permission to publish, and a copyright license of transfer of rights does not have to be agreed on by bothCopyright Office interprets that as meaning that authors have equal rights to the work (an undivided ownership share): in other words, any author can grant permission to publish, and a copyright license of transfer of rights does not have to be agreed on by bothcopyright license of transfer of rights does not have to be agreed on by both authors.

(3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending;...

As I pointed out in my post on this earlier decision, the Copyright Act requires a signed assignment in writing in order for a transfer of ownership to take place.

If the provincial legislation effected a transfer of ownership other than according to the terms of the federal Copyright Act, then this would seem to be a potentially unconstitutional interference with federal jurisdiction over copyrights.

If it were transferred, e.g., in a will, does the original length of the copyright still apply, just that the ownership would be to the new owners?

«And your proof of ownership can be the artist's rights and your bill of sale, or a declaration from the artist that the rights or copyrights to the work they did for you were transferred to you.»