Not exact matches
«If you can make
heat behave as a wave and have interference while controlling how far it moves, you could basically control all the properties behind
heat transport,» said Martin Maldovan, an assistant professor in the School
of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and School
of Physics
at the Georgia Institute
of Technology, and the paper's author.
They looked
at how different planetary rotation rates would impact
heat transport with the presence
of oceans taken into account.
Using 19 climate models, a team
of researchers led by Professor Minghua Zhang
of the School
of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences
at Stony Brook University, discovered persistent dry and warm biases
of simulated climate over the region
of the Southern Great Plain in the central U.S. that was caused by poor modeling
of atmospheric convective systems — the vertical
transport of heat and moisture in the atmosphere.
T2Well is an extension
of the TOUGH (
Transport of Unsaturated Groundwater and
Heat) codes, a suite of software tools developed at Berkeley Lab that uses numerical models to simulate the flow of liquid, gas, and heat in porous materials and we
Heat) codes, a suite
of software tools developed
at Berkeley Lab that uses numerical models to simulate the flow
of liquid, gas, and
heat in porous materials and we
heat in porous materials and wells.
Atmospheric waves
at the interface
of rapidly flowing air (above) and near - stationary air (below), leading to mixing and
heat transport.
At the same time, increasing depth and duration
of drought, along with warmer temperatures enabling the spread
of pine beetles has increased the flammability
of this forest region — http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v1/n9/full/nclimate1293.html http://www.vancouversun.com/fires+through+tinder+pine+beetle+killed+forests/10047293/story.html Can climate models give different TCR and ECS with different timing / extent
of when or how much boreal forest burns, and how the soot generated alters the date
of an ice free Arctic Ocean or the rate
of Greenland ice melt and its influence on long term dynamics
of the AMOC
transport of heat?
Related Awards # 1235881 Convective Thermal
Transport at Superhydrophobic Surfaces # 1066426 Investigation
of icephobic behavior
of surfaces with tunable properties # 1331817 STTR Phase I: STTR Proposal on Atmospheric Water Capture using Advanced Nanomaterials # 1066356 Turbulent Flow Drag Reduction Using Surfaces Exhibiting Superhydrophobicity and Riblets # 1235867 Collaborative Research: A Micropatterned Wettability Approach for Superior Boiling
Heat Transfer Performance # 0952564 CAREER: Fundamental Studies
of Condensation Phenomena on Heterogeneous and Hierarchical Nanoengineered Surfaces
The way the ocean
transported heat, nutrients and carbon dioxide
at the peak
of the last ice age is significantly different than what has previously been suggested.
ADDITIONAL OPTIONS are 17» Alloy Wheel A / S, Auto - Dimming Mirrors, Bmw TELESERVICES, Floor Mats, Highlight Trim Finishers Pearl, Rain Sensor And Auto Headlight, Sport Leather Steering Wheel, Tire Pressure Monitor, Additional 12 - V Power Sockets, Auto - Dimming REARVIEW Mirror, CO2 Relevant Vehicles, Hands - Free BLUETOOTH And USB, Moonroof, Satellite Radio Preparation, Standard Instrument Cluster,
Transport Protection, Ambient Lighting, Automatic Climate Control, Daytime Driving Lights,
Heated Front Seats, Shipping Package, Storage Package, Universal Garage - Door Opener, Anthracite Wood Trim, Bmw Assist ECALL, DVD Area Coding, North America, HI - FI Sound System, Power Front Seats, Split Fold - Down - Rear Seat, Tier 2 and much more.We
at Beemer Haus, pride ourselves on listening to the needs
of our customers.
At the very least he needs to provide a pointer to «the calculations
of the sensitivity
of the mean climate to a doubling
of CO2 concentration» that he has found are ignoring changes in non-radiative atmospheric
heat transport.
Global average surface temperatures are not expected to change significantly although temperatures
at higher latitudes may be expected to decrease to a modest extent because
of a reduction in the efficiency
of meridional
heat transport (offsetting the additional warming anticipated for this environment caused by the build - up
of greenhouse gases).
Therefore I would argue that this same freakish Arctic storm and
transport of heat that
at first resulted in the all the «warm» headlines could potentially further lead to headlines
of the more wintery variety, including Arctic or cold air outbreaks and snow storms....
As far as I know, if the only physical mechanism under consideration is the radiative cooling
of the planet's surface (which was
heated by shortwave solar radiation and reradiated
at longer wavelengths in the infrared) via radiative
transport, additional gas
of any kind can only result in a higher equilibrium temperature.
The warm air above nocturnal or polar inversions, or even stable air masses with small positive lapse rates, are warmer than otherwise because
of heat capacity and radiant + convective
heating during daytime and / or because
of heating occurring
at other latitudes / regions that is
transported to higher latitudes / regions.
(In the global time average, diffusion
of latent
heat is in the same direction as sensible
heat transport, but latent
heat will tend to flow from higher to lower concentrations
of water vapor (or equilibrium vapor pressure
at the liquid / solid water surface), and regionally / locally, conditions can arise where the latent
heat and sensible
heat fluxes are oppositely directed.)
re14 Ike Solem >... the rapid changes
at the poles seem to involve a lot
of heat transport into that region via both the atmosphere and the oceans.
Scientists are still trying to decide how the poleward
heat transport will be affected by global warming — but the rapid changes
at the poles seem to involve a lot
of heat transport into that region via both the atmosphere and the oceans.
Moreover, most
of this flow probably occurs
at some depth, where the temperature is close to zero, so its
heat transport is also very low.
Quite apart from the wider publicity given to the
heat transport problem in the Russell ocean model (which affects all
of the published GISS - E2 - R results), and the famous rogue LU run where a negative forcing yields an overall positive net flux response (which is not rogue
at all and not to be excluded according to Gavin), the WMGHG results and particularly the relationship between Fi and ERF values now seem positively bizarre.
Finds that in the Northern Hemisphere there is no reduction in the sensible
heat transport despite the reduction in the zonal - mean temperature gradient
at low levels associated with polar amplification
of the warming
In particular the Faroe Bank Channel overflow, Hornbanki section Atlantic inflow volume and
heat fluxes, Labrador Sea western boundary current
transport at 53 ° N, Wyville Thomson Ridge overflow
transport, Faroe Shetland Channel volume fluxes
of Atlantic Water, Denmark Strait overflow
transport, Iceland - Faroes Atlantic inflow, Kogur Array freshwater flux.
Many
of the projects we look
at as being carbon - friendly (i.e. construction
of a major green energy or clean
transport project) are significantly less so since the big burst
of carbon from construction, which happens
at the start
of the project, hangs around for decades accumulating more
heat than early LCAs accounted for (an abbreviated treatment
of this concept is in Kendall, Chang & Sharpe, Environ.
This can be a result
of heat storage in summer and release in winter; or
of transport of heat from warmer locations: a particularly notable example
of this is Western Europe, which is
heated at least in part by the north atlantic drift.
These observations hint
at a slow down in the
transport of heat from the tropics -
at least in the North Atlantic and North Pacific.
The reason for the decline in sea surface temperatures
at these locations is because
of the reduced
heat transport along the ocean surface from the tropics - where solar
heating is most intense.
Expect about 3 decades
of contributed cooling from the AMO before it reaches minimal
heat transport and begins to speed up again assuming it won't get stuck in a negative phase as
at least one reconstruction shows it did during the LIA.
Is this not indicative
of a major blunder in the simplifications, notably the effect
of convective
heat transport and the stabilising effect
of condensation and evaporation
at the oceanic surfaces?
An atmosphere that is perfectly transparent to incoming and outgoing radiation can not radiate and all its
heat content comes from conduction from the surface and is
transported through the atmosphere solely by convection with no loss
of energy to space except for the tiny fraction
of atoms
at the top
of the atmosphere that exceed escape velocity.
Lucifer, if you look
at my references you'll see that ocean
heat transport has been going down over the last decade3 and the OHC
of the N Atlantic has been decreasing since 2007.
If the gas permits irreversible
heat transport at all by any means, including by mere thermal radiation (also irreversible) then the entropy
of the system will increase as it becomes isothermal (assuming isolation and no external or internal sources
of continuous work).
Thermal fluctuations do not strictly increase entropy
of any system — note well, any system — only when all parts
of the system that are in «thermal contact» (connected by interactions
of any sort that permit the
transport of heat) are
at the same temperature.
As I mentioned above, this is not hard to understand if you look
at heat transport as a diffusion phenomenon, i.e., as flow in accordance with the laws
of probability from a region characterized by a higher concentration (
of fast molecules or fast electrons) to one with a lower concentration.
Heat picked up
at the surface is thus rapidly vertically mixed and
transported by all three mechanisms — conduction, convection and radiation — acting
at different length scales and with considerable and non-ignorable chaotic and self - organized emergent mesoscale structure — to produce an atmosphere that, as you note, ends up somewhere between the DALR and isothermal most
of the time, although inversions (warmer on top) or with a gradient even larger than the DALR happen all the time, and are unstable or transiently metastable states with some lifetime and break apart and perhaps reform somewhere else as the conditions that favor them recur.
Climate change
at those higher latitudes is dominated by variations in the
transport of surplus tropical
heat.
It takes decades (even centuries) for (deep) oceanic
heat transport to manifest
at the surface so we see a combination
of short - term
heat manifestation as a result
of the 11 yr solar cycle and longer - term variation.
However — latent
heat is a significant component
of energy
transport at the surface and varies with water availability on land.
Given that they make the bulk
of vertical
heat transport in the atmosphere, not sure the models are worth more than the expertise
of the different groups into building complex subgrid paramterisations, and this is very far from «models implemetning first principles»... I think that
at this stage, climatology have more to win from progress in filling experimental database than from progress from modelling.
«Much
of our confidence stems from the fact that our model does well
at predicting slow changes in ocean
heat transport and sea surface temperature in the sub-polar North Atlantic, and these appear to impact the rate
of sea ice loss.
Warning
of the scale
of the task, Haszeldine pointed out that, whereas discussion on realising CCS
at scale is often focused on electricity, the challenges
of decarbonising
heat and
transport are, perhaps, even greater.
In the case
of dry air and without CO2, the cooling
of the radiator is given by h * (T - Ta) where T and Ta are temperatures
of the surface and the air layer, respectively,
at the given time t. h describes the
heat transport from the surface to the layer by radiation and convection.
However, an assessment
of transports at 48 ° N using five repeat World Ocean Circulation Experiment sections and air - sea
heat and freshwater fluxes as input to an inverse box model yielded no significant trend in the meridional overturning
at that latitude (Lumpkin et al., 2008), though the time period studied was relatively short (1993 - 2000).
Two things jump out
at me here: you speak
of «other scenarios» and «possible
heat transport trends».
I think David Young's point can be addressed by looking
at how much
of the
transport of heat and moisture is resolved by the model, and it turns out it all is very well accounted for.
The blackbody temperature isn't particularly relevant
at a single point
at the surface because there are lots
of different
heat transport mechanisms that affect the local surface energy balance and there's lots
of thermal inertia
at the surface, particularly the oceans.
This is the first time we've seen waters this warm in any
of the fjords in Greenland... the subtropical waters are flowing through the fjord very quickly, so they can
transport heat and drive melting
at the end
of the glacier.
I have the impression that a partial import
of this suggestion is that we all must stop driving cars; put our air conditioner thermostats
at 95F, and
heating to 60F; build up limited mass transit and otherwise limit the
transport of goods and services between locales....
In 2006 I went to a talk by a physical chemist who talked about how mass and
heat transport are coupled: you can't calculate the flux
of carbon dioxide from water to atmosphere and vice versa just by looking
at the concentrations, you need to know the relative temperatures too.
In the case
of transport and
heating fuel, there is more scope for saving energy
at short notice; cutting leisure journeys, for instance, wearing extra pullovers and, in the slightly longer term, driving smaller cars have a role to play while, in the longer term, there is a totally different low - energy paradigm waiting to be developed.
At last week's Conservative Party Conference, the new Energy Minister, John Hayes, promised that «the high - flown theories
of bourgeois Left - wing academics will not override the interests
of ordinary people who need fuel for
heat, light and
transport — energy policies, you might say, for the many, not the few» — a pledge that has triggered fury from green activists, who fear reductions in the huge subsidies given to wind - turbine firms.
We subject an aquaplanet GCM to a large array
of different spatial patterns and magnitudes
of ocean
heat transport, and look
at how variations in the
transport affect aspects
of the time - mean climate.