However,
the transport of heat into the air might go through four channels, which are radiation, convection of the air in the air layer, heat conduction and evaporation.
It has to do with intermittent
transport of heat into the deep ocean.
Mauritsen said the warming of the upper ocean and the atmosphere during the summer through reduced cooling around Europe results in the stronger
transport of heat into the Arctic, which is actually «pristine» in general.
Not exact matches
It would provide important insight
into how much SRM would reduce radiative
heating, the concentration
of water vapor in the stratosphere, and the processes that determine water vapor
transport — which affects the concentration
of ozone.
In 1982, German researchers discovered that the edge
of the plasma can spontaneously bifurcate
into a high pedestal with a steep gradient, or
transport barrier, that produces the H - mode confinement and maintains the
heat of the plasma core.
They looked at how different planetary rotation rates would impact
heat transport with the presence
of oceans taken
into account.
A combination
of computer simulations and observational data reveal that air pockets from the eye can
transport heat and moisture
into the surrounding storm, increasing the hurricane's intensity.
When the jet stream does that, it
transports more
heat and moisture up
into the Arctic, which
heats the Arctic more, which make the jet stream even wavier — another vicious cycle related to disappearance
of sea ice.
Transport by these deep - reaching eddies provides a mechanism for spreading the hydrothermal chemical and
heat flux
into the deep - ocean interior and for dispersing propagules hundreds
of kilometers between isolated and ephemeral communities.
After flowing to the cooler face in a wind, it will then tend to recombine
into neutral atoms, and thus will enhance the
transport of heat.
Water vapor can
transport a lot
of heat, so when Ceres formed 4.6 billion years ago, sublimation
of water ice might have dissipated much
of its
heat into space, Campins and Comfort wrote.
Going against our previous inclination to not use any other road
transport, we escaped the
heat of Oaxaca and crossed the border
into Chiapas, arriving in the state capital
of Tuxtla Gutiérrez nearly 2,000 feet above sea level.
Interior rooms were no longer containers but portals to
transport the viewer; the tiny, yet implicitly vast sunset breaking down the distinction between in and out, close and distant, small and large, whilst introducing intense summer
heat into a scene
of winter mists and cold.
This process is part
of what is called the «thermohaline» or «overturning» circulation and is associated with a significant amount
of heat transport into the North Atlantic, which indeed keeps Britain and the rest
of the North Atlantic region 3 to 6 degrees C warmer than they otherwise would be.
For instance, there is no evidence that, with the current configuration, atmospheric
heat transports have vastly different modes
of behaviour — and so they are unlikely to suddenly flip
into a new state.
One
of the reasons that more
heat is being
transported into the Barents Sea is because
of the general rise in temperatures within the Atlantic waters.
It then turns
into the North Atlantic Drift which is really the flow
of water responsible for the anomalous northward
heat transport in the Atlantic.
A good way to estimate the effect
of the thermohaline part
of the
heat transport is to shut it down by dumping a lot
of freshwater
into the north Atlantic in a climate model, which stops deep water formation there.
This storm is helping to
transport large amounts
of heat out
of the subtropics and mid-latitudes
into the Arctic and that is resulting in a pattern change that is reversing the record strong polar vortex
into a weaker, more disturbed polar vortex that should support a colder weather pattern across the hemisphere....
How would this change in currents affect the amount
of heat in the surface layer that is
transported into the Arctic and contributes to melting the Arctic Sea Ice?
re14 Ike Solem >... the rapid changes at the poles seem to involve a lot
of heat transport into that region via both the atmosphere and the oceans.
Another course participant, Matt Briggs, who is a wild mushroom seller and Near - Net - Zero Retrofit house owner and the writer, director, and producer
of the documentary Deep Green - Solutions to Stop Global Warming Now «was waiting for the affordable Model 3 to plug
into my 10kw solar roof so I can finally almost eliminate my carbon footprint for coal electricity, natural gas
heat, and now oil
transport.»
Rob Painting: The
transport of heat down
into the surface to deep ocean occurs via the subtropical ocean gyres.
Scientists are still trying to decide how the poleward
heat transport will be affected by global warming — but the rapid changes at the poles seem to involve a lot
of heat transport into that region via both the atmosphere and the oceans.
IBM thinks one
of its 10 MW data centers could
heat about 700 homes, and they're looking
into using a water - cooled system to
transport the
heat.
This reminds me
of a reference I read some years ago to a country in Africa that has put a well - designed «better donkey cart»
into use in rural areas, where
heat, sand, and lack
of roads make automotive
transport unsuitable.
«The bikes will be
transported between locations by increasing the
heat pumped
into the balloon so that it may float
into the sky with the rack
of bikes connected.
Unfortunately, there is no detailed instrument record
of subsurface changes in Gulf Stream
heat transport into the region over the past decades, so it's hard to say — and the atmospheric component?
Sea ice is lost due to increasing ocean
heat transport into the arctic and the resulting loss
of ice causes the atmosphere to warm.
This has nothing to do with
heat transport into the ocean, although that phenomenon, in my view, also supports fairly high sensitivities once the evidence for significant rates
of deep ocean
transport are factored in (but that's a different topic).
A near 80 degree Fahrenheit reading that would be warm in summertime — but one that cropped up in early April as a result
of powerful and hot south to north air flows
transporting heat across Asia and
into the Arctic.
«It is found that the
heat transport into the western Barents Sea sets the boundary
of the ice - free Atlantic domain and, hence, the sea ice extent.»
Storms help replenish warm water next to the ice, and help carry addtional
heat into the melting region via atmospheric
transport of warmer moist air.
AGW climate scientists seem to ignore that while the earth's surface may be warming, our atmosphere above 10,000 ft. above MSL is a refrigerator that can take water vapor scavenged from the vast oceans on earth (which are also a formidable
heat sink), lift it to cold zones in the atmosphere by convective physical processes, chill it (removing vast amounts
of heat from the atmosphere) or freeze it, (removing even more vast amounts
of heat from the atmosphere) drop it on land and oceans as rain, sleet or snow, moisturizing and cooling the soil, cooling the oceans and building polar ice caps and even more importantly, increasing the albedo
of the earth, with a critical negative feedback determining how much
of the sun's energy is reflected back
into space, changing the moment
of inertia
of the earth by removing water mass from equatorial latitudes and
transporting this water vapor mass to the poles, reducing the earth's spin axis moment
of inertia and speeding up its spin rate, etc..
There is also a planetary boundary layer module that evaluates the turbulent
transport of heat and water vapor from the ground surface
into the atmosphere.
Based on various paleoclimate proxies and model results, it has been suggested that the input
of freshwater
into the North Atlantic following these events led to slowdowns
of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) and reductions
of its considerable northward cross-equatorial
heat transport.
There is no energetic or entropic advantage to be gained from an isoentropic circulation — the only place you actually increase entropy and irreversibly lose
heat (the factor that drives all
of those
heat transport mechanisms) is where something warms and where it cools, where I mean really cools by irreversibly rejecting
heat into a cold reservoir, not just adiabatically moving it around, conserved.
Here, we have shown that this warming was associated and presumably initiated by a major increase in the westerly to south - westerly wind north
of Norway leading to enhanced atmospheric and ocean
heat transport from the comparatively warm North Atlantic Current through the passage between northern Norway and Spitsbergen
into the Barents Sea.»
This, in turn, results in increased
heat transport into the Arctic (i.e., the «Arctic Amplification»), a prominent feature
of earth's recent warming [7 - 9]..
I would assume that all that happens is that the
transport of heat is changed in the model: if surface air temps in the model are too high compared to observations, more
heat is made to go down
into the ocean, and vice versa.
According to a new study, this cold pool may be an indicator
of a dramatic slowdown in the Gulf Stream, which
transports vast amounts
of heat north from the equator to the pole, passing off the East Coast
of the U.S. and
into the North Atlantic.
Convective patterns driven by
heat transport in the interior
of the Earth push one crustal plate under another (subduction) and the friction
heats up the magma necessary for volcanic action — which in turn releases CO2
into the atmosphere.
My point is that reduction in Arctic / Antarctic ice uses almost no «global»
heat, while raising sea - levels orders
of magnitude (~ 120 times) more than thermal expansion due to
heat transported into the deep ocean.
It's long been known that the Gulf Stream has a significant role in maintaining a mild climate in Northern Europe by the
transport of heat far
into the North Atlantic.
Since the equatorial westerlies / easterlies are indications
of the state
of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation, which is linked to Sudden Stratospheric warming, your head starts getting cooked once you get
into the gravity waves that
transport all that energy to the polar
heat sinks:)
Given that they make the bulk
of vertical
heat transport in the atmosphere, not sure the models are worth more than the expertise
of the different groups
into building complex subgrid paramterisations, and this is very far from «models implemetning first principles»... I think that at this stage, climatology have more to win from progress in filling experimental database than from progress from modelling.
That's because solar energy drives evaporation which is an express elevator
transporting energy (insensibly; without surface
heating) thousands
of feet up
into the atmosphere where it condenses and radiates to space much easier than it can radiate from lower altitudes.
[3] The Greenhouse House Gas Protocol categorizes direct and indirect emissions
into three broad scopes: Scope 1: All direct GHG emissions; Scope 2: Indirect GHG emissions from consumption
of purchased electricity,
heat or steam; and Scope 3: Other indirect emissions, such as the extraction and production
of purchased materials and fuels,
transport - related activities in vehicles not owned or controlled by the reporting entity, electricity - related activities (e.g. T&D losses) not covered in Scope 2, outsourced activities, waste disposal, etc..
Simpson began with a gray - body calculation, Simpson (1928a); very soon after he reported that this paper was worthless, for the spectral variation must be taken
into account, Simpson (1928b); 2 - dimensional model (mapping ten degree squares
of latitude and longitude): Simpson (1929a); a pioneer in pointing to latitudinal
transport of heat by atmospheric eddies was Defant (1921); for other early energy budget climate models taking latitude
into account, not covered here, see Kutzbach (1996), pp. 354 - 59.
This occurred in part because
of large amounts
of ocean
heat being
transported into the area through the Bering Strait.