Miller said it was very important to consider how, as parents, we speak to people who are unkind, and how
we treat other people in front of our children.
When dealing with people, there is a very basic tenet that says you should
treat other people in a manner that reflects how you would like to be treated.
Not exact matches
Buari's Ryderz still costs $ 50, but instead of being
treated like cattle, rides are
in a clean minivan with only four
other people.
There are prison politics that are put
in place to make sure
people treat one
other with respect and don't steal, and to weed out the
people causing problems on the prison yards.
Maintaining high standards for how
people treat each
other is a wonderful thing as we live
in a world that's rife with animosity and discrimination.
Why have we made more progress on certain diseases while
other mass - scale killers, like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are largely off of
people's radars and so difficult to
treat in an age of therapies which can resemble magic?
An explosion
in Manchester has killed at least 22
people and 59
others are injured
in what's been
treated as a «terrorist incident».
With patience we
treat other people with a sense of decency, which
in turn increases the possibility they will respond
in kind.
The first step the investigator should take is examining how
other people were
treated in the same situation.
Two
people have died and three
others are being
treated in hospital, according to the Press Association.
But over the years, employers have reached differing conclusions about how the Act's language should be interpreted — specifically the line that says employers must
treat pregnant women the same as «
other persons not so affected [by pregnancy] but similar
in their ability or inability to work.»
«You had many
people in that group
other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists and the press has
treated them absolutely unfairly,» Trump said at Trump Tower
in New York.
Appearance counts, but your overall demeanor
in the office and the way you
treat other people will carry more weight, John says.
Kaplan acknowledges that while we can't technically mistreat artificial intelligence programs
in the same way we are capable of mistreating
other people, how we
treat AI programs may impact how we
treat people.
Treating each
other well, being respectful to each
other, building a culture you actually want to live
in, these are all things that make
people happier, and
in the end, more productive.
In other words, one can not simply look at tax rates and conclude that because a two - earner family pays less tax than a single earner family with the same income the tax system is
treating people unfairly
Here is a far better set of test: Which community has beliefs tat lead its members to
treat persons in other communities with love and respect - to serve them and meet their needs?
Christ would never
treat people this way and I don't believe he'd approve of
others discriminating
in his name.
«Common values,» I found
in my interviews, is a phrase that stands
in for one of two things:
treating other people with respect or giving back to the community.
One that is just, and merciful, and concerned with how we
treat each
other and our world (because yes, the Tanach has instructions on how we are to
treat even our animals)... or one that just makes willy - nilly laws, fails to spell out what he wants
in a single, comprehensive passage (since there are conflicting passages all through the bible), and then gets his rocks off on sending
people to «hell» to suffer eternally when they don't figure it out right.
Here is a far better set of test: Which community has beliefs tat lead its members to
treat persons in other communities with love and respect — to serve them and meet their needs?
Plus the Man
in the Sky tells
people to
treat each
other with respect.
There are many
people on this Earth who don't believe
in God and are Good to
other people, and that is great, but how have they
treated God?
It is also true that later
people used (and still use) his teachings to oppress
others, but many (perhaps most) Christians today look to the example of Jesus for guidance
in how to
treat others, not to the Old Testament.
It's interesting to see how
people will find their own truth, dig
in their heals and be blind to any
other idea... What would Jesus do is an interesting question... I consider my self a Christian and a spiritualist... because I believe it's just not as black and white as one religion or another thinks... there is way more grey area... but a fundamental truths that are a good rule to live life by, wether you are christian or not...
treat others the way you want to be
treated... do unto
others... I am my brothers keeper... all apply.
Jesus seems to be asking us to be godly
in our manner of
treating other people with respect.
Live a good life... be a good
person...
treat others fairly... and all will work out
in the end.
I have yet to see anywhere
in the Bible a condemnation of owning
other people, which seems obviously wrong to most
people today, regardless of how well slaves are
treated they are still property.
As an atheist who believes
in «Choice» (I dislike the idea of abortion but see the need for
people to be able to opt for it) and polygamy (marriage should be for any number of consenting adults regardless of gender) and believes that the idea of draconian anti-gun measures is anathema as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing
in a deity makes a
person treat other people nicer then we should leave that
person and his beliefs alone.
In a recent Ethics Daily post, Dennis Atwood wrote that the «ongoing process of «knowing» God should make a real difference in the way we live, make decisions, and treat other people.&raqu
In a recent Ethics Daily post, Dennis Atwood wrote that the «ongoing process of «knowing» God should make a real difference
in the way we live, make decisions, and treat other people.&raqu
in the way we live, make decisions, and
treat other people.»
As artificial birth control and abortion define the
other as something to be destroyed or defended against, or as
in - vitro fertilization and cloning
treat the
person as a commodity which can be manufactured and marketed, the body ofwoman reminds man that our eternal dignity is realized precisely
in our embodiment and not despite it.
In population control, euthanasia, abortion, and eugenics, the human
person is
treated as an object or product to be used or eliminated according to the purposes of those who have power over
others.
Any value Jesus had was
in the universality of his message about how all
people should
treat all
other people.
The alternative would be to make a tactical retreat, hand over our schools gradually to the state, and insist on the right of Catholic pupils
in state education to be
treated with the same consideration as
people of
other faiths.
These
people can say what they want,
treat others in the most despicable, cruel and out right evil ways, and their supporters, (friends and
other leaders) will justify the wrong doing without any regard to the word of God.
The categorical imperative to «
treat humanity, whether
in thine own
person or
in that of any
other,
in every case as an end withal, never as means only» (46) was, for Kant, the «universal law of nature» (38) and his understanding of it is the most radical conception of natural law
in its modern sense.
On Apel's account, these rights articulate the valid meaning that can be given to the second formulation of Kant's categorical imperative: «So act as to
treat humanity, whether
in thine own
person or
in that of any
other,
in every case as an end withal, never as means only» (46).
But maybe that set apartness is supposed to be more
in the way we show grace for
people we dislike, or the way we
treat others, not
in what aspects of modern culture we eschew.
In closing my point is this: Treat religion like your genitals, don't wave them around in public or force them on other peopl
In closing my point is this:
Treat religion like your genitals, don't wave them around
in public or force them on other peopl
in public or force them on
other people.
The best way to bring the sinfulness of such sins home to us is to point toward the places where humans
in fact act wrongly:
in home, school, business, contacts with
others, and the like, where by pride, self - seeking, neglect of our neighbors, ugliness of behavior
in our homes, and so much else, we often behave
in a reprehensible manner or we subtly and insidiously
treat other persons as mere «things.»
There
in the closed room, where one probed and
treated the isolated psyche according to the inclination of the self - encapsulated patient, the patient was referred to ever - deeper levels of his inwardness as to his proper world; here outside,
in the immediacy of human standing over against each
other, the encapsulation must and can be broken through, and a transformed, healed relationship must and can be opened to the sick
person in his relations to otherness — to the world of the
other which he can not remove into his soul.
Kant's categorical imperatives, «Act always on such a maxim as thou canst at the same time will to be a universal law» and «So act as to
treat humanity, whether
in thine own
person or
in that of any
other,
in every case as an end withal, never as means only,» are actually
in one sense imposed from without.
Up to a certain point, this applies even
in a relationship
in which the
other person treats one strictly as It, for the
other must be a Thou for us unconditionally and not dependent on how he
treats us.
«There is never any doubt
in the Bible that we are to
treat others properly and New World form of slavery where the
person was the property of another was against the law of God.»
Thus there is very little disagreement with Kant's famous dictum: «So act as to
treat humanity, whether
in thine own
person or
in that of any
other,
in every case as an end withal, never as a means only.»
Ancient literature, like modern fairy tales, is full of narratives
in which gods and
other supernatural beings disguise themselves as human beings, sometimes as the lowest of the low, and roam throughout the world to see how
people will
treat them.
We need to see that
in how we
treat the elders... And we have to stand on that... that it is unacceptable to value some
people more than
other people.
In other words, her project suggests that if our governments are going to
treat people more humanely, that will not be because the
people are sufficiently educated and articulate to demand humane treatment, but rather because their Guardians have been convinced through the imaginative sympathy engendered by the novels they read to be kinder and gentler toward their charges.
It finds crucial meaning
in this world, for example
in how one
treats other people.
Its spiritual dimension is fostered and gleaned through the interplay of relationships
in the school, how
people treat each
other, and the ritual gatherings that evoke a sense of continuity with the past and give a community its identity.