Sentences with phrase «treat other people in»

Miller said it was very important to consider how, as parents, we speak to people who are unkind, and how we treat other people in front of our children.
When dealing with people, there is a very basic tenet that says you should treat other people in a manner that reflects how you would like to be treated.

Not exact matches

Buari's Ryderz still costs $ 50, but instead of being treated like cattle, rides are in a clean minivan with only four other people.
There are prison politics that are put in place to make sure people treat one other with respect and don't steal, and to weed out the people causing problems on the prison yards.
Maintaining high standards for how people treat each other is a wonderful thing as we live in a world that's rife with animosity and discrimination.
Why have we made more progress on certain diseases while other mass - scale killers, like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are largely off of people's radars and so difficult to treat in an age of therapies which can resemble magic?
An explosion in Manchester has killed at least 22 people and 59 others are injured in what's been treated as a «terrorist incident».
With patience we treat other people with a sense of decency, which in turn increases the possibility they will respond in kind.
The first step the investigator should take is examining how other people were treated in the same situation.
Two people have died and three others are being treated in hospital, according to the Press Association.
But over the years, employers have reached differing conclusions about how the Act's language should be interpreted — specifically the line that says employers must treat pregnant women the same as «other persons not so affected [by pregnancy] but similar in their ability or inability to work.»
«You had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists and the press has treated them absolutely unfairly,» Trump said at Trump Tower in New York.
Appearance counts, but your overall demeanor in the office and the way you treat other people will carry more weight, John says.
Kaplan acknowledges that while we can't technically mistreat artificial intelligence programs in the same way we are capable of mistreating other people, how we treat AI programs may impact how we treat people.
Treating each other well, being respectful to each other, building a culture you actually want to live in, these are all things that make people happier, and in the end, more productive.
In other words, one can not simply look at tax rates and conclude that because a two - earner family pays less tax than a single earner family with the same income the tax system is treating people unfairly
Here is a far better set of test: Which community has beliefs tat lead its members to treat persons in other communities with love and respect - to serve them and meet their needs?
Christ would never treat people this way and I don't believe he'd approve of others discriminating in his name.
«Common values,» I found in my interviews, is a phrase that stands in for one of two things: treating other people with respect or giving back to the community.
One that is just, and merciful, and concerned with how we treat each other and our world (because yes, the Tanach has instructions on how we are to treat even our animals)... or one that just makes willy - nilly laws, fails to spell out what he wants in a single, comprehensive passage (since there are conflicting passages all through the bible), and then gets his rocks off on sending people to «hell» to suffer eternally when they don't figure it out right.
Here is a far better set of test: Which community has beliefs tat lead its members to treat persons in other communities with love and respect — to serve them and meet their needs?
Plus the Man in the Sky tells people to treat each other with respect.
There are many people on this Earth who don't believe in God and are Good to other people, and that is great, but how have they treated God?
It is also true that later people used (and still use) his teachings to oppress others, but many (perhaps most) Christians today look to the example of Jesus for guidance in how to treat others, not to the Old Testament.
It's interesting to see how people will find their own truth, dig in their heals and be blind to any other idea... What would Jesus do is an interesting question... I consider my self a Christian and a spiritualist... because I believe it's just not as black and white as one religion or another thinks... there is way more grey area... but a fundamental truths that are a good rule to live life by, wether you are christian or not... treat others the way you want to be treated... do unto others... I am my brothers keeper... all apply.
Jesus seems to be asking us to be godly in our manner of treating other people with respect.
Live a good life... be a good person... treat others fairly... and all will work out in the end.
I have yet to see anywhere in the Bible a condemnation of owning other people, which seems obviously wrong to most people today, regardless of how well slaves are treated they are still property.
As an atheist who believes in «Choice» (I dislike the idea of abortion but see the need for people to be able to opt for it) and polygamy (marriage should be for any number of consenting adults regardless of gender) and believes that the idea of draconian anti-gun measures is anathema as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing in a deity makes a person treat other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alone.
In a recent Ethics Daily post, Dennis Atwood wrote that the «ongoing process of «knowing» God should make a real difference in the way we live, make decisions, and treat other people.&raquIn a recent Ethics Daily post, Dennis Atwood wrote that the «ongoing process of «knowing» God should make a real difference in the way we live, make decisions, and treat other people.&raquin the way we live, make decisions, and treat other people
As artificial birth control and abortion define the other as something to be destroyed or defended against, or as in - vitro fertilization and cloning treat the person as a commodity which can be manufactured and marketed, the body ofwoman reminds man that our eternal dignity is realized precisely in our embodiment and not despite it.
In population control, euthanasia, abortion, and eugenics, the human person is treated as an object or product to be used or eliminated according to the purposes of those who have power over others.
Any value Jesus had was in the universality of his message about how all people should treat all other people.
The alternative would be to make a tactical retreat, hand over our schools gradually to the state, and insist on the right of Catholic pupils in state education to be treated with the same consideration as people of other faiths.
These people can say what they want, treat others in the most despicable, cruel and out right evil ways, and their supporters, (friends and other leaders) will justify the wrong doing without any regard to the word of God.
The categorical imperative to «treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as means only» (46) was, for Kant, the «universal law of nature» (38) and his understanding of it is the most radical conception of natural law in its modern sense.
On Apel's account, these rights articulate the valid meaning that can be given to the second formulation of Kant's categorical imperative: «So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as means only» (46).
But maybe that set apartness is supposed to be more in the way we show grace for people we dislike, or the way we treat others, not in what aspects of modern culture we eschew.
In closing my point is this: Treat religion like your genitals, don't wave them around in public or force them on other peoplIn closing my point is this: Treat religion like your genitals, don't wave them around in public or force them on other peoplin public or force them on other people.
The best way to bring the sinfulness of such sins home to us is to point toward the places where humans in fact act wrongly: in home, school, business, contacts with others, and the like, where by pride, self - seeking, neglect of our neighbors, ugliness of behavior in our homes, and so much else, we often behave in a reprehensible manner or we subtly and insidiously treat other persons as mere «things.»
There in the closed room, where one probed and treated the isolated psyche according to the inclination of the self - encapsulated patient, the patient was referred to ever - deeper levels of his inwardness as to his proper world; here outside, in the immediacy of human standing over against each other, the encapsulation must and can be broken through, and a transformed, healed relationship must and can be opened to the sick person in his relations to otherness — to the world of the other which he can not remove into his soul.
Kant's categorical imperatives, «Act always on such a maxim as thou canst at the same time will to be a universal law» and «So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as means only,» are actually in one sense imposed from without.
Up to a certain point, this applies even in a relationship in which the other person treats one strictly as It, for the other must be a Thou for us unconditionally and not dependent on how he treats us.
«There is never any doubt in the Bible that we are to treat others properly and New World form of slavery where the person was the property of another was against the law of God.»
Thus there is very little disagreement with Kant's famous dictum: «So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as a means only.»
Ancient literature, like modern fairy tales, is full of narratives in which gods and other supernatural beings disguise themselves as human beings, sometimes as the lowest of the low, and roam throughout the world to see how people will treat them.
We need to see that in how we treat the elders... And we have to stand on that... that it is unacceptable to value some people more than other people.
In other words, her project suggests that if our governments are going to treat people more humanely, that will not be because the people are sufficiently educated and articulate to demand humane treatment, but rather because their Guardians have been convinced through the imaginative sympathy engendered by the novels they read to be kinder and gentler toward their charges.
It finds crucial meaning in this world, for example in how one treats other people.
Its spiritual dimension is fostered and gleaned through the interplay of relationships in the school, how people treat each other, and the ritual gatherings that evoke a sense of continuity with the past and give a community its identity.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z