Sentences with phrase «treat other persons as»

They can treat other persons as things, as commodities, as people to be bought and sold.

The best way to bring the sinfulness of such sins home to us is to point toward the places where humans in fact act wrongly: in home, school, business, contacts with others, and the like, where by pride, self - seeking, neglect of our neighbors, ugliness of behavior in our homes, and so much else, we often behave in a reprehensible manner or we subtly and insidiously treat other persons as mere «things.»

I do not need a jealous and vengeful god for me to treat other people as I would want to be treated.

If we think like that it logically follows that we can legitimately treat other people as cogs in a machine.

Someone who goes around treating other people as inferior to them.

Not exact matches

Maintaining high standards for how people treat each other is a wonderful thing as we live in a world that's rife with animosity and discrimination.

All transgender people considered for service are subject to the same entry standards as any other candidate, and are treated as an individual of their acquired gender, according to the British Army's website.

5 is a «Best Place to Work» for one simple reason: Our steadfast commitment to hire the right people, treat them as fully - formed adults, and point them toward a common vision of helping others.

An explosion in Manchester has killed at least 22 people and 59 others are injured in what's been treated as a «terrorist incident».

The Golden Rule — treat others as you want to be treated — has a fatal flaw: it assumes that all people want to be treated the same way.

I find that most people treat business as a zero - sum game, where one side wins and the other loses.

But over the years, employers have reached differing conclusions about how the Act's language should be interpreted — specifically the line that says employers must treat pregnant women the same as «other persons not so affected [by pregnancy] but similar in their ability or inability to work.»

We hire the best people we can, treat each other decently, and treat our customers as people.

The Golden Rule (treat others as you want to be treated) has a fatal flaw: it assumes that all people want to be treated the same way.

This could actually be a list of one, as most of the other items noted below relate to treating people like numbers on a spreadsheet instead of humans who have unique goals and needs.

I also see this dis - repsect we give to gay people as a breaking away from the idea «treat others how you want to be treated» (I know I wouldn't want to be shunned for something I can not choose to change).

When Israel forsook the Lord's commandment they themselves were treated like the midianites and the people they had driven out, and were put to the sword by foreign conquerers just as they had done to others.

Slavery is ownership of another person as property and the Bible «treats» it as acceptable by addressing it directly and determining the «acceptable» way to own other people.

It's interesting to see how people will find their own truth, dig in their heals and be blind to any other idea... What would Jesus do is an interesting question... I consider my self a Christian and a spiritualist... because I believe it's just not as black and white as one religion or another thinks... there is way more grey area... but a fundamental truths that are a good rule to live life by, wether you are christian or not... treat others the way you want to be treated... do unto others... I am my brothers keeper... all apply.

If God is truly love, and Jesus truly said «treat others as you would have them treat you», that the «religionists» are the ones who hate and condemn the most and those who are not religious preach brotherhood and consideration for all people?

As an atheist who believes in «Choice» (I dislike the idea of abortion but see the need for people to be able to opt for it) and polygamy (marriage should be for any number of consenting adults regardless of gender) and believes that the idea of draconian anti-gun measures is anathema as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing in a deity makes a person treat other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alonAs an atheist who believes in «Choice» (I dislike the idea of abortion but see the need for people to be able to opt for it) and polygamy (marriage should be for any number of consenting adults regardless of gender) and believes that the idea of draconian anti-gun measures is anathema as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing in a deity makes a person treat other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alonas it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing in a deity makes a person treat other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alone.

fail to understand the rich vocabulary of symbolism provided by etiquette, which enables people to recognize essential attributes or intentions of others, such as that a man wearing a tie is treating the occasion seriously.

[4] «cf. Meilaender, Gilbert, The Giving and Taking of Organs, First Things, March 2008, where he emphasises that humans are called to live their bodily life as a personal gift to others and that «presumed consent... does go a long way toward treating persons as handy repositories of interchangeable parts to others.»

It is identical to racial issues: civil and church laws need to protect the truth about the equal dignity of all races because that truth allows us to treat others as persons.

Civil laws and church laws need to protect, respectively, the natural and revealed truths about our sexuality, precisely because those truths allow us to treat others as persons.

«Whatever insults human dignity, such as subhuman living conditions, arbitrary imprisonment, deportation, slavery... the selling of women and children; as well as disgraceful working conditions, where men are treated as mere tools for profit, rather than as free and responsible persons; all these things and others of their like are infamies indeed... they are a supreme dishonour to the Creator.»

As artificial birth control and abortion define the other as something to be destroyed or defended against, or as in - vitro fertilization and cloning treat the person as a commodity which can be manufactured and marketed, the body ofwoman reminds man that our eternal dignity is realized precisely in our embodiment and not despite iAs artificial birth control and abortion define the other as something to be destroyed or defended against, or as in - vitro fertilization and cloning treat the person as a commodity which can be manufactured and marketed, the body ofwoman reminds man that our eternal dignity is realized precisely in our embodiment and not despite ias something to be destroyed or defended against, or as in - vitro fertilization and cloning treat the person as a commodity which can be manufactured and marketed, the body ofwoman reminds man that our eternal dignity is realized precisely in our embodiment and not despite ias in - vitro fertilization and cloning treat the person as a commodity which can be manufactured and marketed, the body ofwoman reminds man that our eternal dignity is realized precisely in our embodiment and not despite ias a commodity which can be manufactured and marketed, the body ofwoman reminds man that our eternal dignity is realized precisely in our embodiment and not despite it.

In population control, euthanasia, abortion, and eugenics, the human person is treated as an object or product to be used or eliminated according to the purposes of those who have power over others.

If we say that fertilized eggs are potentially people and should be treated as such, should we all treat each other as though they are dead?

The alternative would be to make a tactical retreat, hand over our schools gradually to the state, and insist on the right of Catholic pupils in state education to be treated with the same consideration as people of other faiths.

People want to believe so badly that they are willing to treat others not as they would like to be treated, but as something worse, or even kill.

These (most) People just use it as a diversion to distract people away from how they truely are, and ya know what, it works really well on «fellow Christians;» they stick together like glue, like a heard of stupid sheep and baaaaaa baaaa each other, while they go around and treat honest and truthful «evil heathens» like dog crap on the bottom of theirPeople just use it as a diversion to distract people away from how they truely are, and ya know what, it works really well on «fellow Christians;» they stick together like glue, like a heard of stupid sheep and baaaaaa baaaa each other, while they go around and treat honest and truthful «evil heathens» like dog crap on the bottom of theirpeople away from how they truely are, and ya know what, it works really well on «fellow Christians;» they stick together like glue, like a heard of stupid sheep and baaaaaa baaaa each other, while they go around and treat honest and truthful «evil heathens» like dog crap on the bottom of their shoe.

Islam believes Jews and Christians are people of the book and should be treated with respect as well as other religions.

The categorical imperative to «treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as means only» (46) was, for Kant, the «universal law of nature» (38) and his understanding of it is the most radical conception of natural law in its modern sense.

On Apel's account, these rights articulate the valid meaning that can be given to the second formulation of Kant's categorical imperative: «So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as means only» (46).

To «do unto others as you would have others do unto you» implies that people are all alike, and that one proceeds by projecting one's own preferences upon the rest of humanity, then treating everyone else as a replica of oneself.

There in the closed room, where one probed and treated the isolated psyche according to the inclination of the self - encapsulated patient, the patient was referred to ever - deeper levels of his inwardness as to his proper world; here outside, in the immediacy of human standing over against each other, the encapsulation must and can be broken through, and a transformed, healed relationship must and can be opened to the sick person in his relations to otherness — to the world of the other which he can not remove into his soul.

Kant's categorical imperatives, «Act always on such a maxim as thou canst at the same time will to be a universal law» and «So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as means only,» are actually in one sense imposed from without.

Persons who are initially grouped together according to some particular feature come to be treated as interchangeable units and thus are driven into identification with each other and into similar patterns of life which extend the range of likenesses.

Up to a certain point, this applies even in a relationship in which the other person treats one strictly as It, for the other must be a Thou for us unconditionally and not dependent on how he treats us.

Thus there is very little disagreement with Kant's famous dictum: «So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as a means only.»

When we treat others as ourselves, we realize people have the same needs as us.

Some have told us they have enough sandwiches, crackers and some of the other things that are frequently given to them, but they need more people who treat them as people.

Ancient literature, like modern fairy tales, is full of narratives in which gods and other supernatural beings disguise themselves as human beings, sometimes as the lowest of the low, and roam throughout the world to see how people will treat them.

Perhaps CNN should say «Act Christian», since it's how a person treats others (the golden rule) that marks the difference — even the devil knows Scripture — but he doesn't act Christian, since he isn't, and as Scripture says, that's how to determine whether a person is Christian or not, and that is by their «first fruits» or how they act towards others...

Familial life when at its best is so ordered that the personal quality of others is augmented; they can not be treated as if they were merely objects or things to be used by one person simply to promote that person's own development.

They eventually become a nuisance to other people and are generally treated as such....

So many people have seen «Christians» who don't look anything like Jesus to them, so are genuinely surprised and often interested in finding out just why someone does treat others as Jesus did.

This new community also faced struggles from within, with some of their members lying to one another (Acts 5:1 - 11) and certain Jewish people not getting treated as well as others (Acts 6:1 - 7).

Today, more than fifty years after the Holocaust, many of us need to be reminded that Pope Pius XII saved more Jewish lives than any other person, including Raoul Wallenberg and Oskar Schindler» men who are often, and rightly, treated as heroes for their efforts.