Sentences with phrase «treated as a court order»

Under the Ontario Family Law Act (FLA), you can register a separation agreement and the support provisions of the agreement will be treated as a court order.

Under the Ontario Family Law Act, you can register a Separation Agreement and the support provisions of the Agreement will be treated as a court order.

Not exact matches

It also sets off a bureaucratic chain of events which backs up the message that fathers can treat parenting as optional, as health visitors talk to mothers rather than fathers, children centres build their services around what they perceive to be mothers» (rather than families») needs, schools fail to record contact details of fathers and, when a young person ends up in court for misbehaviour, magistrates hand down parenting orders to mothers rather than fathers, even when the father is resident in the household and present in the courtroom.

He also applied to the court to compel the Federal Government to allow him travel abroad to treat his ailment as ordered by the court since November 3.

«I have made an order which has to be obeyed and the order is to the effect that the accused be allowed to go abroad as from November 4 to treat his ailment within three weeks and return to the court on November 26 for his trial in the charges brought against him», the judge had said.

A US court ordered the White House last week to treat its electronic mail messages as federal records, and turn them over to the National Archives.

If the agreement or court order doesn't identify an amount as being solely for the support of a spouse or common - law partner, it will be treated as child support.

Once you separate or get divorced, super is treated as a type of property and can be divided by agreement or by court order.

This was because the dominant purpose of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 was to make confiscation the duty of the court and it would defeat the purpose of the confiscation legislation if orders were treated as bad simply because there had been a failure to comply with procedural provisions laid down for postponement.

Would a Canadian court make such an order, given the growing (but still small) number of precedents (but only one in Canada so far) of treating social media as one more alternative «place» on which indirect service can be made?

You have to treat the information as a secret in order for it to be recognized by a court and enforced as a trade secret — control it confidentially and restrict access to it.

Their effect is to continue in the family court any maintenance application issued in the magistrates» court before 22 April 2014 and to treat any maintenance order made by or registered with magistrates as if it had been made by the family court.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, set aside the original trial decision, and made an order declaring that for the purposes of the Family Law Act, the structured settlement money is to be treated as income paid to the wife, and not as property.

Since many local family court judges treat violations of these restraining orders as criminal contempt — and send parents to jail as a sanction — this becomes even more problematic.

«This case provides yet another example of a litigant treating an order of the court as if compliance were an optional indulgence.»

The court may treat as done that which ought to have been done, namely the variation of the original order by consent to record the terms agreed between the parties and the correction of any slips in the ex parte order which would have been obvious to the parties.

We agree with Husband that this alone would have been insufficient to support the family court's refusal to exercise the discretion it reserved in the temporary order to treat alimony paid during the pendency of the litigation as an advance on equitable distribution.

The Court granted the order, on the basis the proceeds of sale would be treated as if subject to the same rights (if any) as the time charterer had in respect of the cargo prior to its sale.

(2) A court may order that any document filed in a civil proceeding before it be treated as confidential, sealed and not form part of the public record.

The courts treat consent orders as contracts.

Date — Bah JSC in this case stated that: «what is intended to be covered by Order 81 are irregularities, short of situations of want of jurisdiction or infringements of statutes other than the High Court Rules... thus, whilst Order 81 rule 1 treats non compliance with the Rules as not nullifying the non - complying proceedings, the rule DOES NOT apply to non — compliance which is so fundamental as to go to Jurisdiction, or which is in breach of a Statute other than the civil procedure rules; breach of the Constitution; or the breach of the rules of natural justice.»

Rather, the court must look to the co-owners» entire course of conduct — in other words the totality of evidence — in order to determine if they intended that their interests were mutually treated as constituting a tenancy in common.

Ordinary time extensions should not have been treated in the same way as situations where sanctions for non-compliance were pre-determined in either the court rules or orders, circumscribing the ability to extend time limits without resort to the court.

[2] The main issue on appeal is whether, as the appellant contends, the court may make a disposition order directing that treatment begin immediately even though the hospital or treating physician does not consent to that disposition.

However, if the payor is subject to a court order, the spouse receiving spousal support or APL must treat the payments as income for federal tax purposes and the spouse paying the order may deduct the payments in arriving at adjusted gross income.

Since many local family court judges treat violations of these restraining orders as criminal contempt — and -LSB-...]

Master Schlosser's initial approach, to treat an RTDRS Order as an Order of the Court, is more workable than transforming an application for relief into an appeal.

Paragraphs 5 and 6 list a number of applications (enforcement orders, orders for compensation for financial loss, attachment of a warning notice to contact orders, revocation or amendment of enforcement orders, and exercise of powers following breach of enforcement orders) in which the court should exercise its power under s 65 (2) of the Magistrates Courts Act 1980 to treat the proceedings as «family proceedings».

According to Rimer LJ, those dicta had the effect of stating that, where a «husband is, either actually or in substance, the 100 % owner of a company that owns an asset that might usefully be applied in or towards satisfaction of a wife's ancillary relief claim, it will or may be open to the court to pierce the company's corporate veil and treat that asset as property of the husband so as to enable it to be the subject of a s 24 (1)(a) order».

Such order shall be treated in the district court as any other decree issued in a proceeding concerning the allocation of parental responsibilities.

most courts still treat the presence of a third party trademark in keyword metatags as essentially a per se trademark infringement — even if the keyword metatags didn't (and couldn't) change the search results ordering or any consumer's behavior...

Courts can not treat the legal custody granted by signing an affidavit of parentage (AOP) the same as a judicial determination custody; therefore, a party seeking a determination of custody and parenting time, having only signed an AOP, can not be required, as is the case when modifying an order of custody or parenting time, to show proper cause of a change in circumstances.

Any maintenance payment ordered by the court is treated as your income and you have to pay tax on it.

«Support payments that a person is required to make, whether it's pursuant to a court order or a separation agreement, are treated by many lenders the same way as debt payments when the lender is reviewing an application for financing,» she says.

Spouses who live in states that do not offer legal separation, such as Florida and North Carolina, can also enter into such agreements; however, these agreements are typically treated as private contracts and not converted into court orders.

We specialize in treating a variety of mental health disorders, as well as serving those satisfying court - ordered treatment, and individuals managing life stressors.

When you file a family law case in a Tampa Bay court that involves children (such as divorce, paternity, or modification of a parenting plan), you will get a standing notice or order which prescribes how parents should treat one another and their children.

(is past due rent / court ordered judgment treated the same as credit debt?)