Sentences with phrase «treated as irrelevant»

The death of the attorney is likely to be treated as irrelevant to the protection of privilege by the Court of Justice.

[i] However, in practice, they might often be treated as irrelevant.

He is not any kind of source on county politics or the sheriff's office and should be treated as irrelevant.

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

Not exact matches

These superficial and accidental traits which are taken as marks of race are in themselves educationally irrelevant and should be so treated in the allocation and conduct of schooling.

As this summary brings out, Kim's argument involves treating two very different kinds of «observability» as if the difference between them were irrelevanAs this summary brings out, Kim's argument involves treating two very different kinds of «observability» as if the difference between them were irrelevanas if the difference between them were irrelevant.

Heavily influenced by the Enlightenment and the philosophical tradition of Logical Positivism (the idea that if something is not able to be judged true or false, then we are rationally compelled to ignore it as irrelevant), much of the modern Church has bought into the belief that the truth of Christianity should be treated like any other set of factual claims, and that people of faith can somehow rationally observe ultimate truth with a level of personal detachment and objectivity.

«Useful fictions» are no longer useful if they are recognized as fictions or treated as «parables» whose truth or falsity is taken to be irrelevant.

But it's never okay to treat a spouse as irrelevant or an annoyance.

I agree that it's never OK «to treat a spouse as irrelevant or an annoyance.»

Treating race as if it were irrelevant sends the hurtful message that it lacks value and importance.

With home education, free from the artificial environment of spending several hours per day with the same people (of the same age) children learn rapidly to treat everyone else as an individual, irrelevant of looks.

On a macro scale the individual photons are irrelevant and treating the atmosphere as a normal body is fine.

Each year is treated as a fresh start, and even if information about prior performance is available, it may be seen as largely irrelevant to the task at hand.

These global policy links are tangible and to decide that they are irrelevant to Australian teachers is at best, treating them with disdain, and at worst as those who are incapable of critical judgement.

We are tightening up houses without worrying about the buildup of toxic chemicals and VOCs in them, and if we treat this issue as irrelevant we are going to have sick houses the way we had sick buildings in the 70s, because we sealed them so tightly without worrying about air quality.

To treat its «case law» as irrelevant would disregard a considerable and growing body of non-binding, but solid legal reasoning on access to information, public participation and access to justice in environmental matters.