Sentences with phrase «treated slaves»

, including the following: dinosaurs and humans co-existed on Earth; slave - masters generally treated their slaves well; in some areas, the KKK fought the decline in morality by using the sign of the cross; and gay people have no more claims to special rights than child molesters or rapists.

These texts teach students Bible - based facts, including the following: dinosaurs and humans co-existed on Earth; slave - masters generally treated their slaves well; in some areas, the KKK fought the decline in morality by using the sign of the cross; and gay people have no more claims to special rights than child molesters or rapists.

Now, if she does come back, I expect an apologetic, comparable to the «Slavery was not so bad because the masters treated their slaves like family» crap.

I'm sure he treated his slaves right.

JohnQuest — Some People treated Slaves with upmost respect.

Slaves under Mosaic Law were different from the harshly treated slaves of other societies, more like servants or bondservants.

Some people treated slaves as family members in recent history and some did so back in the days of Abraham.

God knew how harsh these surrounding cultures treated their slaves so God gave a big warning not to ever forget just how bad it was and never forget when they were slaves in Egypt.

The land not only treated slaves badly they were wicked in many other ways.

Abraham treated his slaves with respect and even trusted them to find a wife for Isaac.

Did he show how to treat slaves?

God commanded the Chosen not to treat slaves harshly as they were treated (450 years) when slaves in Egypt.

By formulating rules on how to treat a slave that's tacit acceptance of slavery.

The Bible encourages â $ œslave ownersâ $ (similar to employers) to treat slaves fairly and well since they, the owners would have to answer to their own Master (God) one day for their actions.

The bible does not promote slavery, although it does recognize the practice and calls upon new Christian believers to treat their slaves as equals (cf Philemon).

The Bible is full of rules on how to treat slaves, including injuring them.

How about the bits regarding the proper ways to treat slaves?

Eventually the Church moved to the forefront of abolition because we understood this truth: Just because the Bible contained instructions about how to treat slaves in a context and culture where it was acceptable to hold slaves does not mean slavery is a godly practice or part of God's intended purpose for creation.)

You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way.

Bible says it's OK to own a slave, how to treat your slave and how much to pay your slave.

So as long as Christians treat their slaves in a «fair and righteous» manner, such as not beating them so bad that they die in a day or two, then slavery is okay, and slaves should make sure and obey their masters?

The Bible clearly shows it was wrong for Joseph to be sold into slavery and Sarah to treat her slave Hagar like dirt.

One way is show kindness and not treat slaves the way the rest of the land that they are now entering into do.

Seems like a pretty good way to treat a slave.

The Bible in various passages urges us to treat slaves humanely, but nowhere does it oblige us to set them free.

It is also true that it tells masters to treat their slaves kindly and as fellow believers

The Bible also says that masters should treat their slaves kindly, so while I believe that slavery in and of itself is ok, I believe that it is often practiced wrongly.

But that same God also told the owners to love and treat their slaves as brothers.

Masters were to treat their slaves fairly, and slaves were to obey honourably.

If you're going to say anything you have 2 choices: «God was right and I think slavery is just as groovy» or «God was wrong and instead of instructed how to «appropriately» treat slaves, He should have plainly told everyone slavery was wrong and to release any slaves immediately.»

The master tries to keep this truth hidden, to suppress it, by making his control more and more arbitrary, so there is no recourse beyond his will as to how he treats the slave.

For example, Paul's admonition in Ephesians 6:9 for masters to treat their slaves well, was used by a later generation as permission for slave ownership.

A «master» can never treat a slave well, the slave does not have the right to say yes or no.

I treat my slaves with respect and consideration BUT I also have a sadistic mean streak.

The biggest obstacle in her rescue is the salacious Calvin Candie, an out of type cast Leonardo DiCaprio, who treats the slaves like the dirt of the cotton fields he oversees.

This third entry in the Annals of the Western Shore, about a well - treated slave jolted into furious awareness of slavery's evils, illuminates powerful, humanistic concerns as well as Le Guin's finesse at imagining diverse cultures.

Not exact matches

Another banner read: «We want to be treated like a human, not a slave.»

If you are going to say the Bible says what is right and wrong, then you can not ignore the facts in the Bible of which say how you can own slaves and how you can treat them of which we ALL are absolutely morally opposed to (even Christians).

What do we really know about the conditions and the way slaves / bondservants were treated by a «holy people»?

Slaves treated humanely were still slaves as they were deprived of their frSlaves treated humanely were still slaves as they were deprived of their frslaves as they were deprived of their freedom.

So in the (not so distant) future look for him to do animal sacrifices in his yard, beat / kill his kids when they mouth off, torch his neighborhood when he realizes he lives next to people that don't believe as he does, own and beat his slaves, and we won't even discuss how he'll treat his wives.

He gives the rules for how to TREAT those young girl slaves and NEVER EVER once says it's wrong to sell them.

Slaves are to be treated like property.

I have yet to see anywhere in the Bible a condemnation of owning other people, which seems obviously wrong to most people today, regardless of how well slaves are treated they are still property.

that is because they use slave labor and treat there populous like trash.

Also, most slaves were treated very poorly in that time.

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

And if the slave girl's owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter.

46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly [unlike the non-Israelites which you can treat ruthlessly]» Leviticus

They took in abandoned children and raised them as their own; they treated women and slaves better than anyone else; they cared for the sick during plagues when no one else would.