Sentences with phrase «trees do»

Sumac and Sweet Gum often turn long before other trees do.

Fig trees do not like to be moved around.

Our trees don't grow as fast as people cut them down.

When I asked if she was comfortable so close to so many trees, she responded, «Those particular trees don't frighten me.»

I believe that houses have spirits, just as trees do, water, the earth that we walk on.

Banyan trees don't grow to their full potential in one day.

These firms will figure out that decision trees don't bolt the firm for greener pastures, that intelligent systems deliver the same experience regardless of practice group and billing rate, and that client protocols don't vary according to how many hours they've docketed so far this month.

1997 A.M. Solomon and A.P. Kirilenko, «Climate Change and Terrestrial Biomass: What If Trees Do Not Migrate?»

Although older trees store significant amounts of carbon, these trees do not continue to sequester at the rates they did when they were younger.

Probably not, but we have found evidence that trees do their best to grow around electrical wires.

Mikey Mann proves that when it is cold trees do not produce tree rings and you prove that the Thermocline is a fiction and that the worlds navies have been wrong about this sonar thingy all along.

Why is it so complicated to say scientifically what trees do to climate?

As you can see from our control group, normal maple trees do not take the bifurcated Y shape but branch randomly.

Trees do not simply absorb energy and get warmer.

Also, most high - latitude trees don't photosynthesize quickly (it's a tough life up there!).

Trees don't grow well in ice.

Of course trees do!

It would be hard to place a value on the soul - soothing pleasure - giving worth of trees, but city trees do a whole lot more than just spark happiness.

Though the trees don't care, they'll just continue saving us regardless.

If you don't know which is good or bad climate — ask the trees — trees don't tell lies as you people.

In my house, with today's temperature expected to rise to the mid-80s, I'll close up the house this morning to keep the place cool, and I may lower some window shades to block solar gain (though porches and shade trees do a pretty good job with that already).

Secondly, there is little reason to expect biologically a late - age spurt — earlier larger, but younger trees than the modern trees don't show such behaviour (see the grass plots of Steve McIntyre (# 48)-RRB-.

Of course this is all moot if the relativel short - lived trees don't actually begin life with a (statistically) significantly higher growth rate, or if (say) ring growth and root growth don't go together... which I don't know about.

Additionally, there are two more recent studing arguing based on tree ring data that after the conventional removal of the biological growth effect, trees do show an age - dependent climate sensitivity.

From snatching carbon dioxide (CO2) out of the air like trees do, to launching giant mirrors into space, scientists are researching a wide variety of technologies to artificially slow global warming.

So this looks like pretty simple math: 150 meters X 0.8 C / 100m = 1.2 C is the approximate temperature change that can be registered by the upper treeline (since at 150 meters below, where it is 1.2 C warmer, the trees don't respond to the temperature surge with a growth surge).

I think trees do respond to mechanical stresses of wind and I think there have been posts at CA mentioning this — simple beam strength requirements mean it will be in the tree's «interest» to develop a thicker section inline with the applied force.

The trees don't become taller every year and suffer increasing risk of toppling over.

That is when forest biologists warning that the growth rings of specific trees do not provide accurate temperature indications were ignored.

FUF also plants 1200 + trees per year, so these trees do have a defined planting location.

What seems to often be neglected by the proponents of growing trees (or bush or forest) as a way of counteracting the build - up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is that trees do not live forever.

Trees do not grow well on exposed bed rock.

That is, in drought conditions trees don't increase their transpiration to summon water from afar.

Other programs that loan or rent trees do not have a defined planting location.

«Air capture» — that's what trees do.

Yes GE the trees do not hug CO2 limiting houses and factories.

«Trees do sequester carbon dioxide everywhere... but are more likely to trap heat in in upper latitudes..»

The problem with using corals, speleothems etc is that in contrast to trees these do not derive their carbon direct from the atmosphere, so it is necessary to correct for admixture of «old» carbon, an admixture that may well have varied widely over time.

Trees don't grow that fast; I can't seem to find a good number — perhaps one ton every 20 years?

-- Trees don't grow in the winter, and it is the winters temperatures that have caused warming in the N. Hemisphere, but Mann failed to relies those basic facts.

And even if individual trees don't do as well, their offspring just need to live a few feet higher up the hillside to do just as well.

With facts, we can show that trees do a better job mitigating CO2 than do IWT's.

There is no fee required for a Tree Planting Permit, however, the permit is necessary to ensure that street trees do not impact infrastructure and are appropriately planted so that they thrive and become a neighborhood asset.

Modeling the climatic factors affecting tree growth is extremely difficult, but the Garryland Wood trees do seem to be responding, somehow, to the energy flux.

Trees don't grow in ice.

The trees don't know what to do either.

Trees do not grow at -40 C trees can grow slowly at -10 C trees can grow slowly at 0C trees can grow moderately slowly at 5C trees can grow moderately quickly at 10C trees can grow well at 20C trees can grow slowly at 50C trees do not grow at 100C Can you see any shape to the curve of tree growth vs temperature?

Shade trees do affect summertime electricity use, but the amount of the savings depends on the location of the tree.

I think there is an important context here that is easy to lose in all of the emphasis on the thing that the trees don't appear to be doing well w / (i.e. the response to the high - frequency cooling events associated primarily with explosive volcanic eruptions): that's, the thing that the trees appear to be doing remarkably well with, i.e. capturing the long - term trends and low - frequency variability that is predicted by the climate model simulations.

Pests and disease migrate much more quickly than trees do — their ranges expand in kilometres, rather than metres, per year.