The tree line was hundreds of meters higher 3000 years ago, we still find remnants of
trees under glaciers.
Not exact matches
It's like the carbon - dated remains of
tree stumps that are found
under receding alpine
glaciers, high above today's
tree line.
And there I say that the mark in stone or the carbon - dated
tree stump from
under the
glacier trumps the model simulation every time, because these are empirical data while the model simulation is not.
Then there is actual physical evidence: carbon - dated remains of
trees (or even signs of earlier civilization) recovered
under receding
glaciers high above today's
tree line, Viking farms buried in the Greenland permafrost, etc..
The best data of all, of course, are provided by actual physical evidence: carbon - dated remains of
trees or signs of past civilization
under receding
glaciers, farm houses buried in permafrost, etc..
Trees and old human artefact are being found
under glaciers as they shrink back to a more NORMAL size.
For me, the most convincing actual physical evidence (living in Switzerland) is carbon - dated remains of old
trees found
under receding
glaciers at altitudes far above today's
tree - line.
Tree stumps and even human artefacts have been discovered
under NATURALLY RETREATING
glaciers as the climate WARMS NATURALLY from the coldest period in 10,000 years.
However, there have been other studies in both the Swiss and Austrian alps (e.g. Schlüchter, Patzelt), which have found carbon - dated remains of
trees under receding
glaciers, supporting the conclusion that the glacial extent during the Roman Warm Period and the MWP (as well as during earlier warm periods) was less than today.
His study, based on carbon - dated
tree remains, which were recovered
under receding alpine
glaciers, gives a clear picture of smaller
glacier extent than today in several periods over the past 10,000 years.
What he wanted to know was how long ago the
glaciers made their first forays into a long - lost forest to kill the
trees and bury them
under ice.