This trend has good intentions, but it's not based on factual evidence.
Not exact matches
Not only was it a relief to come across a nonpolemical group show that attempted to be «honorable» (a stance that
has perversely come to sound almost reactionary), but there were unexpected illuminations as a result of its
good intentions —
good intentions that included representation of more women than men (by one), a
good number of relatively unknown artists, and as many unfashionable as fashionable
trends.
What you
've done is group some of them together to make a point, but now it is becoming a
trend influencing many other painters — so maybe it is an «ISM» in the making, but it's not a very
good one — it can't possibly last, the works will «casually» fall apart or fade, or disintegrate, but I guess that's another non-intentional «
intention», right?
can't help but see a down side for regular folk
good weather time slots go up in price less able to pay are reduced to the bad weather weekends:) seriously, everything nowadays
has curious end result being of most benefit to the top ** seems to be a
trend despite
good intentions super computer output puts out mostly for the super wealthy
Here, the master
has been witness to a divorce impasse which may not resolve itself without intervention, and the parties» statements of
good intentions should not be relied upon to bring about a reversal of a behavioral
trend already witnessed.