The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) reports: «In 2013, the vast majority of worldwide climate indicators − greenhouse gases, sea levels, global temperatures, etc − continued to reflect
trends of a warmer planet.»
Not exact matches
While a 16 - year - period is too short a time to draw conclusions about
trends, the researchers found that
warming continued at most locations on the
planet and during much
of the year, but that
warming was offset by strong cooling during winter months in the Northern Hemisphere.
That's not enough to counteract an overall negative
trend for the country, which, if the
planet warmed by 6 °C from preindustrial levels, could suffer damage worth 6 %
of its gross domestic product, the team reports today in Science.
While a strong El Niño provided a boost to global temperatures last year, the main driver
of the
planet's temperature surge, as well as other climate
trends, is the
warming caused by the buildup
of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
The locations
of weather stations, changes in instruments, the siting
of weather stations in
warmer urban areas, changes in land cover and other issues have all been cited as issues affecting the temperature
trends often used to show that our
planet is in fact
warming.
Causes
of warming trends at higher latitudes have gained more widespread attention from researchers in the past few decades, but the idea that the Arctic would
warm faster than the rest
of the
planet has been around for more than 100 years.
Such scaremongering is especially painful to me because even though I do not think that government - approved GMO foods pose meaningful health risks to consumers, and even though I believe strategic genetic engineering can be an important tool to ease human suffering on our
warming and resource - constrained
planet, I share the concerns
of many environmentalists about the homogenization and consolidation
of the global food system —
trends that are accelerated by the spread
of industrially produced GMOs.
This
trend continues a long - term
warming of the
planet, according to an analysis
of surface temperature measurements by scientists at NASA's Goddard Institute
of Space Studies (GISS) in New York.
As has been seen year after year, the
warming of the Earth is causing major changes in many aspects
of the
planet's climate, and 2014 was yet another year that showed this
trend in stark relief, a report released Thursday says.
Even if we focus exclusively on global surface temperatures, Cowtan & Way (2013) shows that when we account for temperatures across the entire globe (including the Arctic, which is the part
of the
planet warming fastest), the global surface
warming trend for 1997 — 2015 is approximately 0.14 °C per decade.
That
trend is projected to continue as the
planet warms and could put coastal cities at risk and cause trillions
of dollars in damage.
«Despite colder than average temperatures in any one part
of the world, temperatures over the
planet as a whole continue the rapid
warming trend we've seen over the last 40 years,» said Gavin Schmidt, director
of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City, at the press conference.
And besides that, we don't need the tree rings to know the
planet is
warming, the last 4 months are riding the top
of the
trend as the
warmest in the instrumental record.
Isn't this a surreal transition time when many people continue with business as usual, chomping up the comforts
of our world and choosing to ignore every
trend except maybe global
warming, and others feel that the life signs
of our
planet are declining so fast that it's already too late no matter what we do.
The recent
warming has been more pronounced in the Arctic Eurasia than in many other regions on our
planet, but Franzke (2012) argues that only one out
of 109 temperature records from this region exhibits a significant
warming trend.
There is every reason to believe the record
warm year
of 1998 will soon be broken, given the
trend of changes we have been seeing occurring throughout the
planet in the last several years.
Daniel Crawford, a cello - playing undergraduate at the University
of Minnesota, came up with a new way to describe the
trend and variations that both characterize our
warming climate — a solo composition, «Song of Our Warming Planet,» in which notes represent annual temperature readings from 1880 to 2012 as charted by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space S
warming climate — a solo composition, «Song
of Our
Warming Planet,» in which notes represent annual temperature readings from 1880 to 2012 as charted by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space S
Warming Planet,» in which notes represent annual temperature readings from 1880 to 2012 as charted by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
Unlike a belief in leprechauns, there is a preponderance
of evidence that CO2
warms the
planet and that the anthropogenic contribution
of CO2 to the atmosphere is causing the observed
warming trend.
-- tendency
of the *
planet to
warm — The UAH data is v5.4, v5.5 limits the recent deviance — «no hidden either
warming or cooling jumps» reads awkwardly — «But despite the fact that August 1997 was shamelessly cherry - picked by David Rose because it gives the lowest
warming trend to the present
of any point before 2000» — It was picked to show 15 years, not the lowest
trend.
James E. Hansen, the head
of Goddard and an outspoken campaigner for prompt cuts in greenhouse - gas emissions, explained that the decades - long global
warming trend and patterns
of warming remain consistent with a growing influence on climate from the
planet's building blanket
of heat - trapping greenhouse gases.
The
planet's temperature goes through constant, small fraction -
of - a-degree fluctuations above and below the long term
trend line
of natural global
warming.
Difference between nighttime lows and daytime highs decreasing — no they aren't
Warming of the
planet since 1880 — same
trend since LIA 40 % rise in Atmospheric CO2 since ~ 1800 — has little effect Underlying physics
of the Greenhouse effect — you don't appear to understand them, and neither do modellers, which is why their predictions have been so wrong
Markey: What I am saying is that this
warming is something that while it may have variability, year - to - year in specific parts
of the
planet that the
trend is straight up.
One passage written by Heartland reads, «Scientists who study the issue say it is impossible to tell if the recent small
warming trend is natural, a continuation
of the
planet's recovery from the more recent «Little Ice Age,» or unnatural, the result
of human greenhouse gas emissions.»
Reconstructing this spatial variability will help develop a more precise view
of how past changes in climate have affected the
planet, Briner says, providing a guide for how the current global
warming trend may unfold.
«Despite colder than average weather in any one part
of the world,» said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt, «temperatures over the
planet as a whole continue the rapid
warming trend we have seen over the last 40 years.»
The lack
of a statistically significant
warming trend in GMST does not mean that the
planet isn't
warming, firstly because GMST doesn't include the
warming of the oceans (see many posts on ocean heat content) and secondly because a lack
of a statistically significant
warming trend doesn't mean that it isn't
warming, just that it isn't
warming at a sufficiently high rate to rule out the possibility
of there being no
warming over that period.
Based on previously reported analysis
of the observations and modelling studies this is neither inconsistent with a
warming planet nor unexpected; and computation
of global temperature
trends over longer periods does exhibit statistically significant
warming.
Likewise, the term «global
warming» is somewhat problematic as well since the
planet isn't
warming uniformly — a few places have a short - lived cooling
trends — and the word «
warming» sounds downright cozy on a cold day, when, in fact, substantially heating
of the atmosphere and ocean is happening.)
There are also growing concerns about
trends for some other greenhouse gases — in particular, the second most - important man - made
planet warmer, methane, the main constituent
of natural gas.
The intensity
of hurricanes and frequency
of the strongest ones like Maria has also increased since the 1980s, a
trend expected to continue as the
planet warms.
Actually Fielding's use
of that graph is quite informative
of how denialist arguments are framed — the selected bit
of a selected graph (and don't mention the fastest
warming region on the
planet being left out
of that data set), or the complete passing over
of short term variability vs longer term
trends, or the other measures and indicators
of climate change from ocean heat content and sea levels to changes in ice sheets and minimum sea ice levels, or the passing over
of issues like lag time between emissions and effects on temperatures... etc..
That shock will be felt most especially by the world's climate alarmist Establishment, whose scientists and learned institutions have staked their reputation on the idea that CO2, not solar activity, is the prime driver
of climate and that the
planet is on a
warming trend not a cooling one.
Small wonder, then, that the modelers» computer «reconstructions»
of the
planet's past climate conveniently wiped out the well - documented three - centuries - long Medieval
Warming Period, as well as the subsequent 500 years of Little Ice Age — nor is it surprising that their terrifying computer prognostications in the IPCC's 2001 Third Assessment failed to predict the next decade's absence of any global warming trend
Warming Period, as well as the subsequent 500 years
of Little Ice Age — nor is it surprising that their terrifying computer prognostications in the IPCC's 2001 Third Assessment failed to predict the next decade's absence
of any global
warming trend
warming trend at all.
In the U.S., we see a different
trend: a much greater number
of deniers who believe that there is no evidence that the
planet is
warming.
It appears that increases in atmospheric CO2 (and other GHG's) are contributing approximately 50 %
of the recent
warming trend on
planet earth
«Many
of the events that made 2012 such an interesting year are part
of the long - term
trends we see in a changing and varying climate — carbon levels are climbing, sea levels are rising, Arctic sea ice is melting, and our
planet as a whole is becoming a
warmer place,» said Acting NOAA Administrator Kathryn D. Sullivan, Ph.D. «This annual report is well - researched, well - respected, and well - used; it is a superb example
of the timely, actionable climate information that people need from NOAA to help prepare for extremes in our ever - changing environment.»
Just a nit, but Venus is an example
of what happens to
planets close to the sun - it is more likely that the added heat input caused the CO2 release than that a sharp rise in CO2 caused a runaway
warming trend.
Moreover, while satellite and ground instrument record agree very well over Europe and United States where the best instruments are deployed there is not satisfactory agreement across most
of the rest
of the
planet with satellite showing very little
warming trend and instrument showing significant
warming trend.
In this letter, we propose that the extensive winter NH extratropical cooling
trend amidst a
warming planet can not be explained entirely by internal variability
of the climate system.
LOS ANGELES — The climate on Mars is showing a
warming trend and recent images have shown the first evidence
of seismic activity on Earth's neighbor
planet, scientists said today.
While the rate
of global
warming has slowed in the past several years, possibly due to natural climate variability, the long - term temperature
trend clearly shows that we're living on a
warming planet.
The basic idea seems to be that the strong Arctic
warming trend of 1.5 C / decade by comparison with a global
trend of 0.2 C / decade indicates that there's some regional effect which makes the difference from the rest
of the
planet.
Projections for the way in which our
planet will be affected by the current
trend of rapid planetary
warming are dire.
Another sticky way
of expressing this same idea is to examine the physical reason why there is a long - term
warming trend - because the
planet is building up heat.
The current
warming trend is
of particular significance because most
of it is extremely likely (greater than 95 percent probability) to be the result
of human activity since the mid-20th century and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented over decades to millennia.1 Earth - orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types
of information about our
planet and its climate on a global scale.
«It's generally been assumed that it's so big and so cold that it's probably immune to some
of the
warming trends we've seen across the
planet,» said Chris Stokes, a professor at Durham University.
As I see it, you SkS folks (any many others) like to see the
trends since 1970 completely man caused and a representative
of the effective
warming speed
of the
planet.
Global
trends point to the world's oceans figuring much more prominently in meeting the foreseeable food and energy needs
of a growing global population and a
warming planet.