I don't know if there may be something to accounting for surface / ocean
trends on decadal scales, but I was interested in the possibility in light of the recent «haiatus» in surface temperatures.
Not exact matches
Increasing abundances of tropical / subtropical species throughout the 20th century reflect a warming
trend superimposed
on decadal -
scale fluctuations.
On longer time scales, the two longest time series (using independent criteria for selection, quality control, interpolation and analysis of similar data sets) show good agreement about long - term trends and also on decadal time scale
On longer time
scales, the two longest time series (using independent criteria for selection, quality control, interpolation and analysis of similar data sets) show good agreement about long - term
trends and also
on decadal time scale
on decadal time
scales.
You may think these are unimportant at the
decadal scale, but this is exactly the topic of Cohn and Lins paper, and, getting back
on topic, the Tsonis paper — these larger
scale variations have a huge impact
on how we perceive climate in the 20th century, particularly in the interpretation of
trends.
On the one hand you say «I don't know how to assess skill of decadal trends» and on the other hand you also claim that the «prediction of mean temperature at the regional scale can be done fairly well given the robust temperature trend»
On the one hand you say «I don't know how to assess skill of
decadal trends» and
on the other hand you also claim that the «prediction of mean temperature at the regional scale can be done fairly well given the robust temperature trend»
on the other hand you also claim that the «prediction of mean temperature at the regional
scale can be done fairly well given the robust temperature
trend».
However, this relationship (which, contrary to the claim of MFC09, is simulated by global climate models, e.g. Santer et al. [2001]-RRB- can not explain temperature
trends on decadal and longer time
scales.»
Yet then after that you say, with apparent complete confidence, that
on a (multi)-
decadal scale instrumental records show a positive
trend.
Throw in a
decadal scale forcing operating
on both, and explain to me why atmospheric
trends in particular locations ought to be smooth.
The Arctic Oscillation was fairly stable until about 1970, but then varied
on more or less
decadal time
scales, with signs of an underlying upward
trend, until the late 1990s, when it again stabilized.
Unforced variability of global temperature is great, as shown in Figure 4, but the global temperature
trend on decadal and longer time
scales is now determined by the larger human - made climate forcing.
But stratospheric water vapor variations apparently do have a sizeable impact
on decadal -
scale trends.
If there are centennial internal variations — and looking back over the holocene it looks to me there are — then «reversions to mean» over a centennial
scale will look like a
trend on which shorter
decadal length variations will be superimposed.
With a simple regression model based
on the four cycles (about 9.1, 10, 20 and 60 year period) plus an upward
trend, that can be geometrically captured by a quadratic fit of the temperature, in the paper I have proved that all GCMs adopted by the IPCC fail to geometrically reproduce the detected temperature cycles at both
decadal and multidecadal
scale.
It is well - known that changes in temperature
on decadal time
scales are strongly influenced by natural and internal variations, and should not be confused with a long - term
trend (Easterling and Wehner, 2009; Foster and Rahmstorf, 2011).
Now the data assessed
on the
decadal scale shows no reason to divert from the null hypotheses that snow extent is randomly hovering about a stable mean, although we have identified some concerns with variability (In winter snow only (periods 12,01,02)-RRB- The question still remains as to whether there are shorter period
trends or particular years that are unusual.