Wind is known to diminish the impact of urban heating, and so
the trends on windy days should be less than trends on still days if this was important.
For 241 out of 265 stations, there is regionally a greater
trend on windy days than calm days.
Not exact matches
The newest entry in the theological literature is Parker (2004, 2006), who, once again, does not show the absence of an urban heat island by direct measurements, but purports to show the absence of an effect
on large - scale averages by showing that the temperature
trends on calm
days is comparable to that
on windy days.
The
trend of temperatures is allowed to be different
on calm and
windy days as you suggest.
purports to show the absence of an [UHI] effect
on large - scale averages by showing that the temperature
trends on calm
days is comparable to that
on windy days.
Lastly Parker does not seem to speculate
on the fairly consistent higher
trend of temperature increase he found
on windy days compared to calm
days, except to say it is the opposite of an urban warming signal and earlier in his paper to speculate that the
windy days might not be as impacted by bad temperature sensing apparatus and siting.