Sentences with phrase «trial against the insurance»

The Court of Appeal found the judge at Kusnierz» 2010 trial against his insurance company, Economical, erred when he concluded that Kusnierz» psychological impairments should not be combined with his physical impairments, and that Kusnierz had therefore not sustained a catastrophic impairment.
Many times, we are able to secure favorable settlements for our clients just by proving our readiness to go to trial against the insurance companies.

Not exact matches

In response to the high demand for aggressive trial attorneys to defend against insurance fraud, Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin has significantly expanded its Fraud / Special Investigation Practice Group.
We have settled Massachusetts rear end collision cases against every insurance company doing business in Massachusetts and we have gone to trial on many as well.
He has 12 years» experience of major commercial litigation in such diverse areas as bribery and corruption of senior executives and misappropriation of corporate assets (including the 24 - week Fiona Trust trial), international arbitration (typically LCIA, ICC, LMAA and UNCITRAL and frequently for or against states or state - owned companies), proceedings in the Commercial Court under the Arbitration Act 1996, banking litigation, offshore engineering, shipping and insurance.
We stand up for victims against insurance companies, and we will not hesitate to take a case to trial if an insurance company wrongfully refuses to honor or resolve your claim.
We have been consistently relied upon as a trial counsel by other New York attorneys and our team understands how to adequately defend against insurance bad faith in these types of situations.
The successful defense, in a two - week jury trial, of the subsidiary of one of the country's largest property and casualty insurance companies against claims for approximately $ 2 million in damages arising for a failed real estate transaction;
Successfully defended insurance company in a bench trial in the Superior Court against unfair claims handling lawsuit, where insurer had improperly denied coverage
While it may sound simpler than court, it can be complicated, and you will have the insurance company trial lawyers (working for your own insurance company) against you every step of the way.
Monsees & Mayer P.C, has many years of trial lawyer experience effectively representing injured people with claims against the major trucking companies and their insurance companies.
In the first federal trial over Hurricane Katrina damage, a Louisiana jury ruled against State Farm insurance company Wednesday, finding that wind, not water, destroyed the New Orleans home of plaintiffs Michael and Judy Kodrin.
Being prepared to take your case to trial and able to represent you strongly against insurance companies separates our firm from the competition.
Trial Insurance provides a clear benefit to plaintiffs, as they receive protection from the sting of having costs ordered against them if unsuccessful at tTrial Insurance provides a clear benefit to plaintiffs, as they receive protection from the sting of having costs ordered against them if unsuccessful at trialtrial.
We stand up for victims against insurance companies and we will take a case all the way to trial and beyond if an insurance company wrongfully refuses to honor or resolve your claim.
Insurance defense attorneys find a flaw or two in the history of events and use that against the victim at the time of trial.
Successfully defended at trial and on appeal a breach of contract claim by an insured against his insurance company claiming the insurer failed to pay damages to a 2006 Ferrari F430 Challenge racing vehicle.
Mr. Torrijos has handled class actions through trial and appeal and has successfully represented consumers in class actions against some of the biggest technology and insurance companies in the country, including: Google, Yahoo!, CitySearch, Network Solutions, Nationwide Insurance, Progressive and Stinsurance companies in the country, including: Google, Yahoo!, CitySearch, Network Solutions, Nationwide Insurance, Progressive and StInsurance, Progressive and State Farm.
Insurance companies understand that hiring defense attorneys and going through trial can be a very expensive proposition, particularly when the facts are against them.
Are you looking for a good car accident lawyer — Georgia trial attorney to go against the big insurance company that refuses to settle your case?
When you team up with our firm, you are not only gaining access to a trial - proven personal injury attorney, but a lawyer with deep insight into what strategies the insurance companies will try to use against you.
Our founder Chad Hemmat personally handles each of our trials and he has the experience you need to have a successful outcome while up against savvy insurance or corporate attorneys in a courtroom full of your community peers.
While insurance defense trial attorneys would generally love to use your prior statement against you — in the event there is a nominal change in your testimony, they will closely follow the law.
The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and awarded a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, vacating a large verdict against Kim's client, a mutual insurance company, on the basis that the insurer's conduct in handling a fire damage claim did not constitute bad faith as a matter of law.
Perfect for the trial lawyer up against big insurance.
The lawsuits against the auto insurance company (on behalf of the uninsured driver) and his accident benefits insurer were settled prior to trial for a total of more than $ 2,400,000.
To a lesser degree, you have the same problem when you hire a personal injury attorney who has no history of taking to trial and winning cases against the insurance company.
The case was successfully settled before trial for $ 100,000 against the insurance company of the driver at fault.
Allen's representative work includes the successful defense of a multi-million dollar insurance coverage and rescission suit by Lloyd's of London; dismissal of a six - figure claim for retroactive premiums against the St. John Community Development Center; summary judgments (affirmed on appeal) against Essex Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company for breach of their respective insurance contracts; trial verdicts against Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual for insurance bad faith; and numerous confidential five, six, and seven figure settlements reached in insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer bainsurance coverage and rescission suit by Lloyd's of London; dismissal of a six - figure claim for retroactive premiums against the St. John Community Development Center; summary judgments (affirmed on appeal) against Essex Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company for breach of their respective insurance contracts; trial verdicts against Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual for insurance bad faith; and numerous confidential five, six, and seven figure settlements reached in insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer baInsurance Company and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company for breach of their respective insurance contracts; trial verdicts against Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual for insurance bad faith; and numerous confidential five, six, and seven figure settlements reached in insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer baInsurance Company for breach of their respective insurance contracts; trial verdicts against Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual for insurance bad faith; and numerous confidential five, six, and seven figure settlements reached in insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer bainsurance contracts; trial verdicts against Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual for insurance bad faith; and numerous confidential five, six, and seven figure settlements reached in insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer baInsurance Company and Liberty Mutual for insurance bad faith; and numerous confidential five, six, and seven figure settlements reached in insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer bainsurance bad faith; and numerous confidential five, six, and seven figure settlements reached in insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer bainsurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer bad faith).
This happened because Jared collected directly against the insurance company for failing to settle the case before trial within their policy limits.
In Richardson East Baptist Church v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co., [36] the insured appealed the trial court's judgment that it take nothing on its claims against the insurer.
I am a trial attorney and have litigated cases against businesses, insurance companies, colleges, universities, trade schools, and schools on behalf of people that...
The trial judge also found that the appellant, CUMIS General Insurance Company, failed to prove the tort of negligent entrustment against Sherif Ismail, if that tort even exists in Ontario.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z