In Li v British Columbia, the British Columbia Supreme Court directed that a summary
trial application proceed before the certification hearing.
Not exact matches
Meanwhile, Rotimi Jacobs, counsel to the EFCC, in opposition urged the court to dismiss the
application and
proceed with the
trial.
Compilation of an investigational medicinal product dossier (IMPD) for the clinical
trial application for two candidate vaccines, allowing them to
proceed to phase I clinical
trials.
The Court is further advised that, in the event that the Plaintiff loans are repurchased and in the IBR, no
trial in this adversary
proceeding will be required as to ECMC or DOE, and being further advised that both the Plaintiff and ECMC and DOE have agreed to the dismissal of this adversary
proceeding as to ECMC and DOE only so that Plaintiff may
proceed with the
application process, good cause appearing, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereby
Just two amongst the appalling issues examined here are the direction by the judge to
proceed with capital changes, overruling a prosecution
application reducing them, and the
trial being forced on in the absence of significant witnesses.
Secondly, the Court rejected the argument that the
application judge erred in not directing the outstanding financial dispute to
proceed to
trial of the issues.
Representing a SaaS company in an opposition
proceeding before the U.S. Trademark
Trial and Appeal Board to oppose a competitor's attempt to register a competing trademark, resulting in express abandonment of the trademark
application by the third party.
Not less than 120 days before the date scheduled for the
trial of the
proceeding, and b) all further
applications, procedures, or other steps in the
proceeding, including interim injunctions are, unless the court otherwise orders, suspended until the motion, including any appeal of the motion, has been finally disposed of.
The rules of court govern every step in a court
proceeding, from how a
proceeding is started, to how parties are served with court documents, to how
applications are made, to how a
trial is scheduled and run.
At present, the bulk of public services seem to me to be delivered at one of three points in people's involvement with the law: general public legal information delivered through seminars, workshops and pamphlets to people who are idly grazing for legal information or helping a friend; narrowly - focused legal information, advice and representation delivered to individuals at the moment of crisis, often following separation, a threat to take the children or service of process; or, detailed, concrete legal information and advice delivered to individuals who are well engaged in a
proceeding, usually unrepresented by counsel, and are seeking details about specific issues, such as making or replying to an
application, demanding or making disclosure or preparing for
trial.
Ultimately Madam Justice Maisonville declined to determine the issue in a Chambers
Application and ordered that the matter
proceed to
trial so that the former lawyer could be subpoenaed and give evidence as to what occurred.
If the court dismisses a s. 11 (b)
application, the original matter
proceeds to its scheduled
trial date.
If the court allows a s. 11 (b)
application, a stay of proceedings will be granted, and the original
trial will no longer
proceed.
That quote will cover off all court appearances from first appearance to the
trial or sentencing; it covers all letters and communications with you, the Crown, experts; it covers all communications with parties including witness preparation, and
trial preparation; it covers the drafting of legal
applications and arguments and the time spent researching relevant case law; it also covers all costs associated with the presenting your case in a brief to the Crown as part of the plea bargaining process and / or the costs associated with a
trial if the matter
proceeds that way.
I had jurisdiction to consider the adjournment
application on the basis of information in the
trial briefs and the statements of counsel at the TMC and I would have made the same decision had the matter
proceeded on that basis.
As a result, Mr. Cahan's
application can
proceed as an
application before the
trial management judge.
The Defendant asked for
trial costs but the Court dismissed the
application finding it was not unreasonable for the plaintiff to reject the offer and
proceed to
trial.
On an
application, the court may direct a
trial of an issue or convert the
proceeding to an action, especially where there are facts in dispute.
The
trial judge refused to hear this
application, and
proceeded regardless.