Sentences with phrase «trial court for»

Thus, the trial court was reversed and the case was sent back to the trial court for further proceedings.

The court also remanded the matter back to the trial court for further proceedings to determine the proper amount of attorney fees to be awarded under the Act, and the court also awarded the Seller attorney fees for the appeals process.

The Supreme Judicial Court of Maine affirmed the ruling of the trial court in the property line dispute, but reversed the ruling on the tortious interference with economic advantage allegations and sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

The California Court of Appeal, First District, reversed the trial court and sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

The court ruled that the Statute did not eliminate the prior «procuring cause» case law, and so the court sent the case back to the trial court for a determination of whether or not the Brokerage could claim to be the procuring cause of transactions which closed post-termination.

Thus, the court sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

Thus, the case was sent back to the trial court for further proceedings.

The court also agreed that the trial court's award failed to reflect moving expenses and property taxes, and so the court sent the case back to the trial court for further consideration on the amount of damages.

The Supreme Court of the State of Idaho reversed the lower court and sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

Thus, the court sent the case back to the trial court for entry of an order for the appraisers to consider the property's value «in light of the property's current physical, legal, and economic characteristics».

Since Stevenson had failed to allege whether a violation of the Association rules was independently actionable, the court sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

Thus, the court sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings on this question.

The Supreme Court of Utah reversed the trial court and sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

Court ruled that the trial court had improperly dismissed this lawsuit and sent the case back to the trial court for a determination on whether the Salesperson was an employee of the Brokerage or independent contractor.

The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, reversed the trial court and sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

Thus, the court reversed the trial court's decision and the matter was sent back to the trial court for entry of an order dismissing the Buyers» lawsuit.

On remand, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that the Broker could be personally liable for the actions of Crank and sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

The Supreme Court of Ohio reversed the lower courts, finding that the jury instructions did not set forth the proper standard and so the case was sent back to the trial court for further proceedings.

Thus, the case was sent back to the trial court for further consideration of these two issues.

Thus, the court reversed the trial court and sent the entire case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1, reversed the trial court and sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

Since a jury could conclude that the Broker was negligent in delegating his responsibilities to Crank, the court sent these allegations back to the trial court for further consideration.

Therefore, the court sent the negligent misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary duty allegations against the Buyer's Representative back to the trial court for consideration by a jury.

While the court agreed that it is possible the Purchaser could claim that the Seller was estopped from claiming title defects which would have prevented the closing when it had misrepresented the status of the title in the purchase agreement, the court ruled that the bankruptcy court had failed to make sufficient findings of fact in support of this ruling and so reversed the equitable estoppel ruling, sending the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

The trial court ruled that the Board's actions were an unconstitutional taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings, including the fee amount that the County could impose upon the Developer for its impact on the road.

Thus, the court reversed the negligent misrepresentation allegations against the Inspector and sent these allegations back to the trial court for further proceedings.

The Court of Appeals of Maryland partially affirmed the lower courts and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings.

Therefore, the court partially reversed and partially affirmed the lower courts, sending the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

The court found that all of this could lead to the conclusion by a jury that the Owner and Licensee had planned to defraud the Purchaser, and so the court sent the fraud allegations back to the trial court for further consideration.

Therefore, the court sent the case back to the trial court for entry of judgment in favor of the Brokerage, based on the terms of the Agreement.

The court also found that there was sufficient evidence that could lead a jury to conclude that S&J and Hall had planned to defraud the Smileys so the court also sent the fraud allegations back to the trial court for further consideration.

The appellate court also sent the case back to the trial court for reconsideration of the attorneys» fees awarded to the owners.

Thus, the case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

The case was sent back to the trial court for further proceedings on the fraud issue.

The court found that the trial court had not considered whether the Buyer was entitled to a recovery of its earnest money, and so the case was sent back to the trial court for further proceedings.

Thus, the court sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings to determine whether the Brokerage or Hopkins had actual knowledge of the property's history of flooding.

Thus, the court affirmed the dismissal of these allegations but remanded to case to the trial court for further consideration.

Thus, the court returned these allegations to the trial court for further consideration.

The appeals court will also turn to the record of the trial court for further analysis.

In 2016, Judge Fidnick obtained the approval of the Administrative Office of the Massachusetts Trial Court for the launch in her Division of the Family Resolutions Specialty Court, a problem - solving court created to provide a low conflict alternative court process for divorcing and separating parents.

This matter was in the trial court for an initial permanent custody order.

Accordingly, the order dismissing the claim for breach of official marks was set aside and remitted to the trial court for fresh determination.

The Supreme Court is the superior trial court for the province and hears both civil and criminal cases, as well as some appeals from the Provincial Court.

Thus, the case was returned to the trial court for plaintiff's compliance with Illinois rule 622 in that the athletic trainer was considered a health care professional under the Illinois healing art malpractice law.

North Carolina Court of Appeals upheld summary judgment with respect to all of plaintiff's claims except one, which was remanded to the trial court for trial on nominal damages only.

It, therefore, reversed the trial court's judgment, and remanded the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

The claim, which was previously defeated by summary judgment, could return to the trial court for determination of its merits.

Petitioner moved the trial court for a new trial based on the newly discovered evidence that had been suppressed by the prosecution.

The circuit court reversed Nacchio's sentence and sent the case back to the trial court for resentencing.

Consequently, the court sent the case back to the trial court for further disposition and trial.