Sentences with phrase «trial courts across»

A former state court administrator, Schmucker managed 246 trial courts across the state of Michigan.

Alan Carlson has worked for 38 years in state trial courts across the country.

The precise content of the duty of good faith, and of the duty of honest performance, will have to be unpacked by trial courts across the country in the years to come.

He affiliated with a larger Denver plaintiff's firm in 2003 and gained more experience briefing personal injury related legal issues in trial courts across the state.

As a result, it is going to be up to the trial courts across the country to provide more guidance as to what «reasonable possibility» of success means when plaintiffs are asking for leave or authorization to go ahead with a securities - based class action against a publicly traded company.

In our experience, class action trials certainly seemed to be no myth: we had begun hearing about more than a few other matters making their way through trial courts across the country.

Not exact matches

The felony convictions of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, now suddenly former assemblyman, had to send cold chills through the Dean Skelos camp, where the former majority leader of the state Senate was, along with his son, on trial across Foley Square in Manhattan federal court on similar bribery and influence - peddling charges.

Their characters react to the news by traveling from their native Virginia, where interracial marriage was still outlawed in 1958, and getting hitched in Washington, D.C.. From there, though, they experience arrest, trial, forced exile across state lines, kids and, finally, a return to Virginia and their case being heard before the Supreme Court.

Note: In the CCJEF trial court decision, now on appeal, Judge Moukawsher, in contrast to all precedents across the country, limited the notion of adequacy to comprise only sufficient teachers, facilities and instrumentalities of learning - and he said the state is already providing adequate funding.

Via Siouxsie Law I came across an interesting recent opinion of the Supreme Court of Georgia that reversed a murder conviction because the trial court allowed the prosecution to introduce «irrelevant and highly prejudicial character evidence» about a teenage defendant's «goth» lifesCourt of Georgia that reversed a murder conviction because the trial court allowed the prosecution to introduce «irrelevant and highly prejudicial character evidence» about a teenage defendant's «goth» lifescourt allowed the prosecution to introduce «irrelevant and highly prejudicial character evidence» about a teenage defendant's «goth» lifestyle.

Have you come across court trials, depositions or government hearings that you think are surprising, bizarre or baffling — and lend themselves to performance?

The Court presides in 52 locations across the province, and is the largest superior trial court in the country, both in the volume of cases and the number of juCourt presides in 52 locations across the province, and is the largest superior trial court in the country, both in the volume of cases and the number of jucourt in the country, both in the volume of cases and the number of judges.

Additionally, Chris has been lead counsel in both jury and bench trials in North Carolina and across the country, and in arbitration proceedings, and has argued appeals before both the North Carolina Court of Appeals and the North Carolina Supreme Court.

By James Cooper www.selfreplawyer.ca In the decade since the Canadian Judicial Council published its Statement of Principles on Self - Represented Litigants and Accused Persons, there has been a developing body of case law across Ontario that recognizes the obligation of trial judges to sensitize themselves to the unique needs of litigants who represent themselves at court.

I just came across this Bureau of Justice Statistics report, «Federal Tort Trials and Verdicts, 2002 - 03», released in August, showing that the number of tort trials concluded in U.S. district courts declined by nearly 80 percent from 1985 to 2003 — from 3,600 trials in 1985 to fewer than 800 trials inTrials and Verdicts, 2002 - 03», released in August, showing that the number of tort trials concluded in U.S. district courts declined by nearly 80 percent from 1985 to 2003 — from 3,600 trials in 1985 to fewer than 800 trials intrials concluded in U.S. district courts declined by nearly 80 percent from 1985 to 2003 — from 3,600 trials in 1985 to fewer than 800 trials intrials in 1985 to fewer than 800 trials intrials in 2003.

Or a lawyer in the midst of a trial might tweet «Awful day in court, ridiculous ruling» that the judge might run across.

The new rules established by the R v Jordan decision to ensure accused persons get a trial within a reasonable time have left courts across the country scrambling to deal with a new reality.

Investment dealers across the country undoubtedly breathed a sigh of relief this past August when the Alberta Court of Appeal released its decision in Merrill Lynch Canada Inc. v. Soost and decisively overturned a trial judge's award of $ 1.6 million to a wrongfully dismissed investment advisor for the loss of his book of business.

45 years working as a trial litigator in State and Federal Courts across the United States.

The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in R. v. Jordan last summer, which dealt with an accused's right to a trial within a reasonable amount of time, highlighted how justice systems across the country are under strain.

In the decade since the Canadian Judicial Council published its Statement of Principles on Self - Represented Litigants and Accused Persons, there has been a developing body of case law across Ontario that recognizes the obligation of trial judges to sensitize themselves to the unique needs of litigants who represent themselves at court.

Anthony J. Scaffidi represents a wide variety of clients across numerous legal fields, including medical malpractice, personal injury, negligence, labor law, real estate, corporate, and commercial law, as well as other complex litigation and transactional matters, at both the trial and appellate court levels.

He has gained extensive court room and trial experience, including contested trials before judges and juries across Hampton Roads.

Litigating before state and federal courts for nearly 40 years, Frank brings notable trial experience to Blank Rome and will enhance the Firm's trial capabilities across practices,» said Alan J. Hoffman, Chairman and Managing Partner.

He helps clients across the construction industry resolve a wide variety of complex business and legal challenges through planning, contract negotiation and drafting, dispute avoidance, claim management, arbitration and litigation from inception through jury trial in state and federal courts across the country.

Prior to joining the firm in 2017, he spent years representing individuals, businesses, banks, creditors, servicers, trusts, government sponsored enterprises, and others in pre-litigation negotiation and settlement as well as trial and appeal in both state and federal courts across the country.

Prior thereto, David served on active duty in the United States Navy as a Judge Advocate where he tried misdemeanor and felony level criminal cases as a prosecutor and defended the Department of the Navy in complex civil cases in trial and appellate courts across the country.

We are very proud to have earned the confidence of the legal industry, with whom we go to trial in state and federal courts across the country.

Norm Pattis is rated among the best criminal lawyers in Connecticut and America, appearing in all Connecticut courts, federal courts in New York, and as lead trial counsel in cases across the United States.

Recognized by Super Lawyers magazine as a «Rising Star» each year since 2015, Ms. Morrow is a skilled trial lawyer and has experience litigating complex commercial and intellectual property disputes in both federal and state courts and across a wide range of industries, including aviation, biotechnology, cyber security, finance, professional sports, software, and telecommunications.

Mr. Nelson has practiced in federal courts all across the United States, and his litigation experience involves all aspects of litigation from pre-litigation analysis and negotiation through jury trial, including managing discovery and disputes, taking and defending depositions, selecting and preparing fact and expert witnesses, preparing and arguing dispositive and non-dispositive motions, preparing and arguing claim construction positions and briefing, and developing case strategies regarding the infringement, validity, and enforceability of patents.

Garrett has litigated and tried cases in bankruptcy courts across the country, the federal trial courts, Georgia state trial courts, the Georgia Court of Appeals, the Georgia Supreme Court, and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

While jury trials are the ultimate trial - court challenge, this is in fact a book that at its core is about shattering your view of yourself as an attorney and getting you to realize how you really come across (to a jury but also to the judge and everyone else).

Erin Rhinehart is a partner with Faruki Ireland & Cox P.L.L. and is an experienced trial lawyer with a focus on the resolution of complex business disputes in (and out of) federal and state courts across the United States.

Courts across Canada have since followed Brown in accepting this argument as a genuine issue for trial, where defendant facilities have attempted to rely on existing waivers or limitation of liability clauses:

Hueston Hennigan attorneys are experienced trial lawyers who have successfully tried high - stakes business litigation in courts across the country, and in the process have amassed an extraordinary record of courtroom victories.

We represent clients at trial and on appeals in many jurisdictions across Canada, including the Supreme Court of Canada, and we pursue cases jointly with firms outside of Canada.

Serve as lead trial counsel in consolidated proceedings involving more than 13,000 individual lawsuits related to client's medical device, including cases consolidated in federal court by the JPML and parallel actions in multiple state courts across the country.

70 Because we drew briefs from Westlaw's database rather than directly from state and federal court dockets across the country, our sample is a convenience sample, and we make no claim that the sample represents each federal and state trial court in proportion to the number of summary judgment motions actually filed.

We have represented both plaintiffs and defendants in trademark, copyright and patent infringement actions, trade secret disputes, contract breaches and general business litigation clients in Federal and State Courts across the country, as well as in the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

A fixture at all levels of trial and appellate courts for the past four decades, Mr. Addario commands enormous respect across the justice -LSB-...]

A fixture at all levels of trial and appellate courts for the past four decades, Mr. Addario commands enormous respect across the justice system for his exquisite courtroom skills, his encyclopedic knowledge of criminal law and his sense of fair play.

Appellate court permits the construction of a pipeline to commence across 21 tracts of land prior to a jury trial awarding just compensation.

Provide advice and legal services to clients across Canada - Provide a comprehensive range of legal services related to employment law - Represent employees and employers at all levels of trial and appeal courts in British Columbia

James Ruiz has extensive trial experience in federal and state courts across the nation representing his clients» business interests for more than 25 years.

She has handled settlement negotiations, arbitrations, and all phases of litigation in federal and state courts across the country, from pre-filing advising and discovery through trial and appellate matters.

A growing number of recent decisions in courts across the globe have commented on the concerns raised by the explosion in social media use by jurors in trials.

It may comprise: advice on complying with pre-action protocols; exploring the different avenues available for alternative dispute resolution (ADR); providing clients with a glossary of terms they will be come across in the court process; instruction sheets in plain English to explain aspects of procedure and the essential law to be applied (translated to be available in Welsh or foreign languages); how to provide disclosure; preparing court documents such as witness statements, case and costs summaries, chronologies and skeleton arguments; complying with the Rules in relation to service of documents, the preparation of statements of case, the appointment and instruction of expert witnesses; the importance of CPR Pt 36; or how to prepare for and what to expect at a financial dispute resolution (FDR) or a final hearing / trial.

Beveridge & Diamond, P.C. lawyers litigate civil and white collar cases in Federal and State trial and appellate courts across the United States.

Recently, a news story made its way across the Calgary news landscape: Alberta Provincial Court Judge Dinkel ruled an inclupatory statement made by the accused, Christa Lynn Chapple, inadmissible as evidence at the trial.