NEW YORK (AP)-- For the second time in a month, one of New York State's biggest political figures is going on
trial in a case brought by a federal prosecutor crusading against corrupt elected officials.
Not exact matches
But it hasn't been all good news —
in September, a
case brought on by a Palm Beach County condo association for faulty construction on a Kolter - developed project went to
trial.
Coinbase has lost another appeal
in a
case brought by former customers of the defunct exchange Cryptsy, and the
case will now proceed to a jury
trial.
Jesse Eisinger, writing for the New Yorker, reported that the SEC attorney, James Kidney, who was
in charge of
bringing the ABACUS
case to
trial, wrote
in an email to his boss at the SEC that it was an «unbelievable fraud.»
Coinbase has lost another appeal
in a lawsuit
brought by former customers of the defunct cryptocurrency exchange Cryptsy, and the
case will now proceed to a jury
trial.
Joseph Smith was never known to be a liar, and
in fact, all court
cases point out that those who
brought him to
trial were the prevaricators.
It is not the judges right or duty to express his personal opinions or beliefs while sitting on the bench, especially while giving a verdict.Judges are there to make sure due process and a fair and impartial hearing or
trial takes place for all those involved.this particular judge's rant on the muslim world based on his views from serving
in the military had absolutely no bearing on the
case and should not have even been
brought up much less used to chastise the victim with.
NEW YORK — Defense lawyers
in the
trial of Joseph Percoco and three business executives told a judge Wednesday they plan on
bringing a full slate of witnesses
in an effort to clear their clients —
in a
case that has
brought scrutiny about the inner workings of the Cuomo administration.
«A jury rejected the government's facts and theory of bribery, and now the
trial judge has rejected a critical legal theory on which the
case was
brought,» Lowell said
in the statement.
The lawyers for the three men state that the alleged crimes did not occur
in the Southern District of New York, where Bharara
brought his
case, and that the
trial will feature numerous defense witnesses being called who reside
in Buffalo.
The prosecutions
in the
case where two suspects are standing
trial before a magistrate court for the murder of former Member of Parliament (MP) for Abuakwa North constituency, Joseph Bokaye Danquah - Adu have failed once again to
bring the bill of indictment for the two
in order for full
trial to begin.
In my assessment, the judiciary has done all anyone can reasonably expect in supporting the current fight against corruption - anti-corruption cases have moved very fast to trial; and judges have imposed especially severe and onerous terms on accused persons brought before them for corrupt acts, with bail terms typically including deposit of their international passports, sureties and bail bonds with assets equivalent to the amount allegedly embezzled; and very high qualifications for standing as suret
In my assessment, the judiciary has done all anyone can reasonably expect
in supporting the current fight against corruption - anti-corruption cases have moved very fast to trial; and judges have imposed especially severe and onerous terms on accused persons brought before them for corrupt acts, with bail terms typically including deposit of their international passports, sureties and bail bonds with assets equivalent to the amount allegedly embezzled; and very high qualifications for standing as suret
in supporting the current fight against corruption - anti-corruption
cases have moved very fast to
trial; and judges have imposed especially severe and onerous terms on accused persons
brought before them for corrupt acts, with bail terms typically including deposit of their international passports, sureties and bail bonds with assets equivalent to the amount allegedly embezzled; and very high qualifications for standing as surety.
I have no idea where the CJ would get the authority not just to reach down and expedite a pending appeal but to order that
cases in varying states of disarray (and maybe some have not even been filed yet) resolved at the
trial level and the first appellate level and
brought up to the Court of Appeals, IF the top court even has jurisdiction over each distinct dispute, within a fixed time.
Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court sitting
in Abuja, on Wednesday, March 9, 2016 dismissed the «no -
case» submission
brought by the embattled National Publicity Secretary of the People's Democratic Party, PDP, Olisa Metuh, who is standing
trial on a 7 - count charge bordering on illegal diversion of funds meant for the procurement of arms preferred against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC.
What might have been the biggest
case got away
in 2010 when the Obama administration dropped plans to
bring five Guantánamo Bay detainees, including Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, to Manhattan for a civilian
trial on charges of plotting the Sept. 11 attacks.
Despite his comments about representing «little people,» Silver was hired as of counsel at the firm Weitz & Luxenberg to
bring «prestige» — as one of the name partners put it
in testimony during the
trial — and he acted primarily as a so - called rainmaker,
bringing in lucrative referrals for mesothelioma
cases, which paid him a portion of the proceeds from any judgment or settlement.
Alleged N400million Fraud: Metuh Loses Bid to Quash Charges... Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court sitting
in Abuja, on Wednesday, March 9, 2016 dismissed the «no -
case» submission
brought by the embattled National Publicity Secretary of the People's Democratic Party, PDP, Olisa Metuh, who is standing
trial on a 7 - count charge bordering on illegal -LSB-...]
The suit would be tried
in state court — unless I
brought a counter-suit against card issuer for some violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act,
in which
case the
trial would probably go to federal court.
As I dug deeper I was struck by the sense of outrage and loss this painting aroused
in so many people: The family of Lea Bondi, determined to reclaim the stolen portrait she had failed to recover
in her lifetime; the Manhattan District Attorney who sent shock waves through the international art world and enraged many of New York's most prominent cultural organizations when he issued a subpoena and launched a criminal investigation following the surprise resurfacing of Portrait of Wally; the New York art dealer who tipped off a reporter about the painting during the opening of the Schiele exhibition at MoMA; the Senior Special Agent at the Department of Homeland Security who vowed not to retire until the fight was over; the art theft investigator who unearthed the post-war subterfuge and confusion that ultimately landed the painting
in the hands of a young, obsessed Schiele collector; the museum official who testified before Congress that the seizure of Portrait of Wally could have a crippling effect on the ability of American museums to borrow works of art; the Assistant United States Attorney who took the
case to the eve of
trial; and the legendary Schiele collector who bartered for Portrait of Wally
in the early 1950s and fought to the end of his life to
bring it home to Vienna.
Were he
brought before a British, (or I suspect Australian court)
in these circumstances his defence team would begin by asking for the
case to be set aside on the basis that he could not possibly receive a fair
trial.
I'm not sure if the same thing applies
in the US but certainly
in the UK a
case will only be
brought to
trial if it is deemed «
in the public interest».
In STC 148/2016 and STC 223/2016, the SCC found that a court had breached the fundamental right to a fair trial of the claimant consumer by suspending an individual action brought by the consumer pending a final judgment concerning an ongoing collective action brought by a consumer association, in manifest breach of CJEU case la
In STC 148/2016 and STC 223/2016, the SCC found that a court had breached the fundamental right to a fair
trial of the claimant consumer by suspending an individual action
brought by the consumer pending a final judgment concerning an ongoing collective action
brought by a consumer association,
in manifest breach of CJEU case la
in manifest breach of CJEU
case law.
[19] Without endorsing all of the factors relied on by the
trial judge as constituting «sufficient reason»
in this
case, I am satisfied that there may be circumstances which may constitute sufficient reason for
bringing an action
in the Supreme Court, thereby triggering its costs provisions, despite the fact that it is apparent from the outset that the award will fall within the monetary jurisdiction of the Provincial Court.
Both the
trial judge and the Court of Appeal held that the
case was adversarial, and was not being
brought for the benefit of or
in the interests of the plan as a whole, but for the particular class of plan members representative by the plaintiffs.
The department has acted
in cases brought under The Terrorism Act 2000, The Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001, The Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005, The Terrorism Act 2006 and The Counter-Terrorism Act 2008; its lawyers are well - versed
in advising and finding redress for those who find their basic and legal rights, such as freedom of speech, the right to a fair
trial and freedom of association, curtailed by state interference.
In first of its kind case in Massachusetts, successfully represented a manufacturing company at a 7 - day trial, obtaining dismissal of harassment and discrimination claims brought by transgendered employee (23 MDLR 23
In first of its kind
case in Massachusetts, successfully represented a manufacturing company at a 7 - day trial, obtaining dismissal of harassment and discrimination claims brought by transgendered employee (23 MDLR 23
in Massachusetts, successfully represented a manufacturing company at a 7 - day
trial, obtaining dismissal of harassment and discrimination claims
brought by transgendered employee (23 MDLR 231)
We fully investigate every
case,
bring in the necessary medical and economic experts and prove our
cases at
trial to ensure our clients get the maximum compensation the law allows.
Notwithstanding a delay of over four years
in bringing a drug
case of modest complexity to
trial, both the
trial judge and the Court of Appeal were of the view that the appellant was tried within a reasonable time.
Partners Joseph Mueller and Nina Tallon achieved a significant
trial victory for McAfee, Inc. — subsidiary of longtime client Intel Corporation —
in a patent infringement
case brought by non-practicing entity TVIIM, LLC.
The focal point of Cromwell's reasons is that determining whether an accused has been tried within a reasonable time is «inherently
case - specific,» and should take into account a balancing of several factors, including society's interests
in bringing a
case to
trial, especially when a very serious offence has been committed.
Already, dozens of
cases in Ontario alone have been stayed under the Jordan framework, with the public becoming particularly familiar with the name when an Ottawa judge threw out a first - degree murder charge against ex-soldier Adam Picard, who was accused of killing 28 - year - old Fouad Nayel, after it took four years to
bring his
case to
trial.
Julie Green and Howard Cooper obtained a complete affirmance from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit of a 2008
trial court victory
in a
case brought on behalf of Judge Leon A. Kendall of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands against the judicial conduct commission of the Virgin Islands, called the Commission on Judicial Disabilities.
At Paragraphs 7 - 10, the
trial judge (Madam Justice Humphries) explained why
in this
case the Plaintiff had «sufficient reason'to
bring the suit is Supreme Court holding that:
It is
brought into force on 6 March 2017 but will not affect any
case in which notice of the
trial date or the start of the
trial window has been given before that date.
Indeed, a joint
trial in the circumstances of this
case did not serve any truth - seeking interest, and
brought few if any benefits to the administration of justice.
It is fair to say that one of the difficulties
in bringing cases to
trial, namely that of lack of a co-ordinated approach and strategy, has been addressed
in recent years.
[1] The
case demonstrates how challenging it can be ``... to
bring order to the chaos which litigants
in person invariably — and wholly understandably — manage to create
in putting forward their claims and defences...» and it also shows how very difficult it is ``... to shift intransigent parties off the
trial track onto the parallel track of mediation.»
We specialize
in creating animations and «legalmentaries»; or high - impact films for settlement, mediation,
case evaluation or
trial that
bring to life the true story of your client's
case through a multimedia video presentation.
(U.S. June 19, 2017)
in which the court finds that «specific personal jurisdiction» (as opposed to «general jurisdiction») is lacking with regard to the claims of members of the class of plaintiffs who are not California residents
in this
case brought in a California state
trial court (
in an 8 - 1 decision with Justice Sotomayor dissenting).
The search for principle takes longer and longer, and
in the meantime
cases awaiting
trial are delayed, to the disadvantage of the defendants awaiting
trial, the witnesses to the events which
bring the defendants to court, and the victims of those alleged crimes.»
It was also argued by Suremime
in reliance on CPR 24.2 that the court should not preclude a new claim being
brought by way of an amendment if there is a compelling reason why the
case or issue should be disposed of at a
trial.
We draw on Sheppard Mullin's extraordinary depth of
trial experience
in staffing our patent
cases,
bringing in specific
trial skill sets as needed to complement our technical and patent - specific litigation expertise.
Andrew's appellate practice is based on both
cases where he acted at
trial, and also those where he has been
brought in for the appeal
in order to provide a new perspective.
The
trial judge also held that under Pennsylvania's procedural law, the
case brought as a wrongful death claim and survival action could be consolidated and
in fact were required to be consolidated and remained together
in court.
Last time we tried a leg amputation accident
case, we
brought in a prosthetic's expert from the client's prosthetic manufacturer from Hanger Orthopedic
in Minnesota who I thought was a very effective witness at
trial.
The
cases we
bring to
trial and resolution,
in the 40 or so minutes between commercials, would take up a month of Sundays
in real life.
They arose
in proceedings
brought by the Ontario Securities Commission to have the
trial judge, Justice Peter Hryn of the Ontario Court of Justice, removed from the matter because of unfavourable evidentiary rulings and what the OSC claimed was Hryn's failure to restrain Groia's aggressive conduct
in the
case.
These terms will inevitably include requirements that the accused reside
in the company of his surety and have absolutely no contact with the complainant for the many months that it will take our overburdened system to
bring the
case to
trial.
To
bring a
case to
trial requires on both sides at least two lawyers with ten or more years of training as well as their staff to organize and exchange this messy evidence and sometimes ask the court for help
in doing so.
Law firms should encourage associates to take on pro bono
cases, allow them to serve externships
in district attorneys» offices, sponsor or provide
trial - skills training and
bring them into the courtroom as second chairs.