The purpose of summary judgment motion is to obtain a just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution by avoiding
a trial in cases where there is no genuine factual dispute.
For example, Webber (who is «at the very top of his game») is regularly called on to advise clients on cerebral palsy and spinal injury cases; he recently secured a favourable outcome for a client on the eve of
a trial in a case where the defendants had previously denied liability.
Not exact matches
«But
in a
case like PRP's,
where our capital needs kept getting greater the closer we got to clinical
trials, we really needed to be increasing Dr. Chao's coverage.»
But it can now be used for Jewish detainees
in cases where there is insufficient evidence to go to
trial or if the suspect refuses to testify.
The
case has seen numerous twists and turns over the past three years, but it's finally set to come to
trial in Pinellas County, Fla. —
where Hogan lives — on July 6.
I took a German reporter through the Scopes
Trial museum a few weeks ago,
where she paused at the tiny glass
case in the back dedicated to Cherokee memorabilia and said, «In Germany, they do not let us forge
in the back dedicated to Cherokee memorabilia and said, «
In Germany, they do not let us forge
In Germany, they do not let us forget.
Such crime if it took place any
where in our Islamic lands and was caught for the crime... he will be torn to pieces there and then with out
trial since
trials are supposed for those who are suspected and not proven guilty... but as a
case that is as plain they should have condemned him to worst death with out any need for court
trials... But by being soft on the issue and giving ear to such junk you open doors for those copycats whom seek fame... That is only fair and secure..
In its appeal to the Full Court, Prysmian argued that the trial judge erred in finding that it had engaged in cartel conduct in circumstances where the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant in the conduct, had been dismisse
In its appeal to the Full Court, Prysmian argued that the
trial judge erred
in finding that it had engaged in cartel conduct in circumstances where the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant in the conduct, had been dismisse
in finding that it had engaged
in cartel conduct in circumstances where the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant in the conduct, had been dismisse
in cartel conduct
in circumstances where the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant in the conduct, had been dismisse
in circumstances
where the ACCC's
case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant
in the conduct, had been dismisse
in the conduct, had been dismissed.
I do think it COULD mean that — but, that sometimes happened to me
in the 11
trials where this recipe didn't work — so hopefully that isn't the
case!
However, we did have a
trial scheme
where the community midwife travelled into hospital with the mother and performed the delivery,
in the hospital with all the paraphernalia (and backup) readily to hand
in case it went wrong.
The Attorney General (AG) filed a nolle prosequi
in the
case of the two, which had reached the stage
where a jury was to be constituted for the
trial of Daniel Asiedu and Vincent Bosso.
Cox, who made an appearance earlier
in the day the federal courthouse
where the Percoco
trial is being held, also criticized Cuomo for not making any public comments about the
case.
In those
cases where it does change a mistrial to a decision, then chances are a new
trial would have given the same decision.
The problem: The display, right outside the ceremonial courtroom
where the Percoco
trial is likely to occur and
where jurors may congregate during jury selection, highlights about 30 criminal
cases — from Abscam to Bernie Madoff — but not a single one that ended
in an acquittal at
trial.
Opening statements begin this morning
in Libous's
trial,
where he is accused by federal prosecutors of lying to the FBI
in a
case stemming from his song Matthew receiving a job at a politically connected law firm.
The lawyers for the three men state that the alleged crimes did not occur
in the Southern District of New York,
where Bharara brought his
case, and that the
trial will feature numerous defense witnesses being called who reside
in Buffalo.
The prosecutions
in the
case where two suspects are standing
trial before a magistrate court for the murder of former Member of Parliament (MP) for Abuakwa North constituency, Joseph Bokaye Danquah - Adu have failed once again to bring the bill of indictment for the two
in order for full
trial to begin.
Attorneys for former top Cuomo aide Joe Percoco and three co-defendants
in an upcoming Albany corruption
trial in Manhattan federal court say a series of posters
in the 40 Foley Square courthouse
where their clients will be tried features dozens of famous
cases from the court's history that could prejudice jurors.
I have no idea
where the CJ would get the authority not just to reach down and expedite a pending appeal but to order that
cases in varying states of disarray (and maybe some have not even been filed yet) resolved at the
trial level and the first appellate level and brought up to the Court of Appeals, IF the top court even has jurisdiction over each distinct dispute, within a fixed time.
n respect to the circumstances of this
case, nowhere is it said
in the ACJA that
where the
trial judge is unable to be present for proceeding
in a matter, the CJ is constrained from re-assigning the
case.
«The question
in these difficult
cases is not whether a local prosecutor, including one with understandably close ties to his or her fellow local law enforcement officers, is capable of setting aside any personal biases
in deciding whether to, or how vigorously, to pursue the
case,» Schneiderman wrote, adding, «the question is whether there is public confidence that justice has been served, especially
in cases where homicide or other serious charges against the accused officer are not pursued or are dismissed prior to a
trial by jury.»
In his ruling, Justice Quadri said: «In respect to the circumstances of this case, nowhere is it said in the ACJA that where the trial judge is unable to be present for proceeding in a matter, the CJ is constrained from re-assigning the cas
In his ruling, Justice Quadri said: «
In respect to the circumstances of this case, nowhere is it said in the ACJA that where the trial judge is unable to be present for proceeding in a matter, the CJ is constrained from re-assigning the cas
In respect to the circumstances of this
case, nowhere is it said
in the ACJA that where the trial judge is unable to be present for proceeding in a matter, the CJ is constrained from re-assigning the cas
in the ACJA that
where the
trial judge is unable to be present for proceeding
in a matter, the CJ is constrained from re-assigning the cas
in a matter, the CJ is constrained from re-assigning the
case.
«We will not try this
case in the press — despite the political overtures and allegations
in the indictment — nevertheless my client Mr Ramirez has entered a plea of not guilty to the charges lodged against him and looks forward to a
trial where he expects to be vindicated.
«Rather, the question is whether there is public confidence that justice has been served, especially
in cases where homicide or other serious charges against the accused officer are not pursued or are dismissed prior to a
trial by jury,» he added.
In the latest trial, reported in the October issue of the Journal of Pediatrics, the vaccine prevented 70 % of severe diarrhea cases on American Indian reservations, where incidence rates are higher than in the general U.S. populatio
In the latest
trial, reported
in the October issue of the Journal of Pediatrics, the vaccine prevented 70 % of severe diarrhea cases on American Indian reservations, where incidence rates are higher than in the general U.S. populatio
in the October issue of the Journal of Pediatrics, the vaccine prevented 70 % of severe diarrhea
cases on American Indian reservations,
where incidence rates are higher than
in the general U.S. populatio
in the general U.S. population.
It is critically important to understand how a genetic pathway actually functions and the consequences of interrupting it, especially
in this
case where there are multiple drug inhibitors of cyclin D being tested
in clinical
trials for breast cancer.
«We are exploring alternative directions for developing this compound, including potential use of the animal efficacy rule,» Cihlar said, referring to a regulatory mechanism under which the U.S. Food and Drug Administration may consider efficacy findings from adequate and well - controlled animal studies of a drug
in cases where it is not feasible or ethical to conduct human
trials.
In any
case, the change was quite small and it's worth pointing out that this was another
trial where myo inositol weight loss did not occur (Minozzi et al. 200827).
After suffering from horrible
cases of bloating as a result of eating gluten and drinking milk,
where I would go from having a flat stomach to looking at least five months» pregnant
in less than an hour, I decided to
trial giving up gluten about six months ago.
From all the clinical
trials that I've looked at, there are several studies that have demonstrated the effectiveness of synephrine for weight loss, and
in cases where it was effective, it involved very high doses.
Their characters react to the news by traveling from their native Virginia,
where interracial marriage was still outlawed
in 1958, and getting hitched
in Washington, D.C.. From there, though, they experience arrest,
trial, forced exile across state lines, kids and, finally, a return to Virginia and their
case being heard before the Supreme Court.
And
in case you're interested
in what longtime investors like Tom and David Gardner have learned, you can always take a free 30 - day
trial of their Motley Fool Stock Advisor service —
where you'll get
in - depth analysis of every stock they've recommended, including their two top stocks for new money now.
Unprejudiced and positive tests are therefore greatly needed, and these can only be found
in show and
trials under judges who have the common interest so keenly
in view that they will allow neither friendship nor personal bias to control the awards; men who will bear ever
in mind that upon their decision will greatly depend the future reputation of the animal
in the stud, and who will therefore examine carefully each specimen before them, giving due credit to beauty and blood, but
in all
cases where possible requiring also performance were they pronounce a favorable verdict».
For Theo Goodwin, consider the paper by J. B. Kadane «Toward a more ethical clinical
trial»,
where Prof Kadane presents the
case that the use of Bayesian inference can reduce the misallocation of risk
in clinical
trials.
Clearly, we can invent
cases where a person omits or covers up a relevant fact (that patient dying
in clinical
trials for example) And clearly no one ever includes all the doubts with every statement they make.
Last week, the appeal court head another
case where the Crown's line of questioning was deemed improper both by the
trial judge and the appeal court, but a retrial wasn't ordered
in that
case.
One explanation for the long pre-
trial delays and high rate of
case settling just before
trial consists
in viewing the litigation process as an information exchange process, up to and leading to
trial,
where information on liability and damages has been fully exchanged.
Recently there has been a
case of the ECHR
in which it elaborates on this issue regarding the expulsion of a Jordanian national to his country of origin
where he ran the risk of violation of the right to a fair
trial.
In a rather unusual
case, an Ontario Superior Court judge has set aside a default judgment that was obtained at an uncontested
trial where the defendant intentionally decided not to show up.
An accused who was previously eligible for a lenient sentence or who had racked up considerable pre-sentence custody could throw
in the towel and make peace with Her Majesty but is now encouraged to take a shot at
trial even
where he assesses his own chances of winning the
case as poor — if you're getting slammed by a mandatory minimum whether you plead guilty or not, you may as well spin the wheel of justice and see what happens.
This is more problematic
in criminal
trials,
where jury questions could provide evidence pushing a
case over the threshold of proof needed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the prosecution failed to provide, than
in civil
cases with a preponderance of the evidence standard.
The consequence to our justice system will be increased delays and expenditures as judges, crowns and duty counsel struggle to provide fair
trials in complex
cases where the stakes are high to self - represented individuals.
However,
in cases where a failure to give proper disclosure has made a fair
trial impossible, or prevented the court from doing justice, or
in instances of a flagrant abuse of process, a superior court will exercise its inherent jurisdiction — its power to control its own procedure so as to prevent it from being used to achieve injustice — to strike out the
case before or during a
trial (see for example Raja v Van Hoogstraten and others [2006] EWHC 1315 (Ch) and CPR 3.4 (5)-RRB-.
Therefore all work on their budgets is wasted except
in the handful of
cases which go to
trial and
where the claimant fails to beat the Pt 36.
A criminal jury
trial is practically unheard of for offences under the Competition Act, because the accused normally plead out so the process is faster, especially
in cases like this one,
where there is no real
case law available under the act, Khoury notes.
MGN also submitted that the judge misdirected himself when he held that there might be
cases where a party was justified
in continuing to
trial even though he had received a favourable offer.
In those instances, civil courts have the ability to stay an action pending resolution of the criminal matter in «exceptional or extraordinary circumstances where there is a real risk that the right to a fair criminal trial will be seriously prejudiced by the continuation of the civil case.&raqu
In those instances, civil courts have the ability to stay an action pending resolution of the criminal matter
in «exceptional or extraordinary circumstances where there is a real risk that the right to a fair criminal trial will be seriously prejudiced by the continuation of the civil case.&raqu
in «exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
where there is a real risk that the right to a fair criminal
trial will be seriously prejudiced by the continuation of the civil
case.»
Acted as appellate counsel
in cases where the firm was not
trial counsel, including matters involving complex commercial litigation and novel issues of law.
In recent cases it has been noted that AIG or their structured settlement brokers are requiring Attorney's to sign agreements, pre-settlement negotiation where in the trial lawyer agrees to utilize AIG's preferred settlement brokers to handle any potential structured settlemen
In recent
cases it has been noted that AIG or their structured settlement brokers are requiring Attorney's to sign agreements, pre-settlement negotiation
where in the trial lawyer agrees to utilize AIG's preferred settlement brokers to handle any potential structured settlemen
in the
trial lawyer agrees to utilize AIG's preferred settlement brokers to handle any potential structured settlement.
This is true, whether it is
in a product liability
case, any other civil
trial or a criminal
case where the data contained within the SDM is important to either side.