Indeed, once upon a time, the FAIR organization was heard to argue strenuously for the retention of the jury
trial in civil proceedings, exactly because it was sought that juries would be MORE inclined to help the plaintiff in claims, legitimate and otherwise.
Not exact matches
Gibbons» travails over his first three years
in office are too numerous to document here (if you want a full accounting, make sure to read Fix friend Jon Ralston) but the following headline says it all: «Governor Gibbons hopes to delay
proceedings in civil trial.»
In BC, chambers judges addressing judicial reviews have a power to transfer such
proceedings to the
trial list (BC
Civil Rules 16 - 1 (18) and 22 - 1 (7)(d)-RRB-.
She has represented numerous individuals
in both the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York
in both criminal and
civil matters and has experience
in all phases of the litigation process
in white collar and federal criminal matters, as well as government and internal investigations, including pre-indictment advocacy, grand jury investigations, complex bail
proceedings, pretrial motions, motions
in limine, jury selection,
trials, sentencing, restitution, forfeiture, and other post-conviction
proceedings.
In civil proceedings, disclosure is regulated by the duty to file a list of documents (CPR 1998, Pt 31) and to disclose the existence at, or during,
trial (without being asked) of any further relevant documents (Vernon v Bosley (No 2)[1999] QB 18, [1997] 1 All ER 614).
In addition to having experience in all phases of civil proceedings such as evidentiary hearings, motion practice, pre-trial preparation, and trials, Mr. Singh has on several occasions represented clients in successfully obtaining or defending against preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders, including successfully defending such results on appea
In addition to having experience
in all phases of civil proceedings such as evidentiary hearings, motion practice, pre-trial preparation, and trials, Mr. Singh has on several occasions represented clients in successfully obtaining or defending against preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders, including successfully defending such results on appea
in all phases of
civil proceedings such as evidentiary hearings, motion practice, pre-trial preparation, and
trials, Mr. Singh has on several occasions represented clients
in successfully obtaining or defending against preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders, including successfully defending such results on appea
in successfully obtaining or defending against preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders, including successfully defending such results on appeal.
However, the case law is clear that it is a matter of discretion for the
trial judge
in the
civil proceedings to decide whether to adjourn (Jefferson v Betcha [1979] 2 All ER 1108) and one to be exercised «with great care» only where there is «a real risk of serious prejudice» (R v Panel on Takeovers and Mergers, ex parte Fayed [1992] BCLC 938).
It is also clear that, while a judge
in civil proceedings will seek to prevent a manifest risk of injustice, ensuring a fair
trial is ultimately a matter for the criminal court, which has extensive powers to remedy any prejudice.
Spears» divorce and custody
proceedings with Kevin Federline ($ 460,000
in total fees and costs), a Florida
civil suit brought by a former manager ($ 113,000), a driving - without - a-license
trial ($ 26,000) and a dispute over mold
in a Malibu property leased by Spears ($ 7,000).
In Imperial Oil v. Jacques, 2014 SCC 66 the court upheld the ruling of a trial judge that allowed the plaintiffs in a class action to access government surveillance materials during civil discovery proceeding
In Imperial Oil v. Jacques, 2014 SCC 66 the court upheld the ruling of a
trial judge that allowed the plaintiffs
in a class action to access government surveillance materials during civil discovery proceeding
in a class action to access government surveillance materials during
civil discovery
proceedings.
Fortune 500 companies, corporate executives and high - ranking public officials retain us for representation
in internal corporate investigations; government investigations, including grand jury, congressional and inspector general investigations; criminal litigation, including
trials and appeals; and related
civil and administrative
proceedings, including qui tam actions.
Civil litigation matters can be complex and involve numerous steps
in the
proceedings such as, pleadings, discoveries, motions, mediation, pre-
trial, and
trial.
Fortune 500 companies, corporate executives and high - ranking public officials retain the firm's investigations attorneys for representation
in federal and state criminal investigations; congressional and inspector - general investigations; criminal litigation, including
trials and appeals; and related
civil and administrative
proceedings.
«As regards most expert opinion,... any benefit from sequestration is considerably diluted, at least
in federal court, by the requirement,
in both
civil and criminal
proceedings, that any expert testimony be disclosed
in advance of
trial.
As lead counsel
in over 200 federal and state jury
trials and numerous administrative
proceedings, Peter Anderson helps public companies, their officers and directors, along with financial service companies, accounting and law firms and their principals, as they respond to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforcement actions, Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations and criminal prosecutions and complex
civil litigation.
Represents individuals, including public officials, lobbyists, and high - level state administrators, as well as businesses,
in state and federal criminal investigations and grand jury
proceedings; clients accused by the government of fraud; students accused of sexual misconduct; Fellow of the American College of
Trial Lawyers; Best Lawyers
in America «Lawyer of the Year»
in Non-White-Collar Criminal Defense; listed
in Best Lawyers
in White - Collar Criminal Defense and
Civil Rights Law categories.
Some of the areas
in which corporate defence groups excel include pre-indictment representation, internal investigations, compliance reviews (including policies / procedures and training), media crisis management, representation
in criminal and
civil trials, parallel
proceedings, criminal appeals, monitorships, receiverships, etc..
Looked at
in aggregate terms, non-family
civil proceedings are subject to an institutional squeeze — there is a constitutional imperative to try criminal cases within a reasonable time (the Askov issue) and a social imperative to move family law cases (particularly those involving children) through the system to
trial with dispatch.
Common examples of such contempts are: publications which are intended or likely to prejudice the fair
trial or conduct of criminal or
civil proceedings; publications which scandalize or otherwise lower the authority of the court; and acts which interfere with or obstruct persons having duties to discharge
in a court of justice.»
The
trial judge concluded that Guatemala's legal system was capable of providing justice and that the plaintiffs could obtain compensation either through a stand - alone
civil suit or through criminal
proceedings related to the same incident, which were already underway
in Guatemala.
«It would be surprising if a claimant
in civil proceedings, who had to allege criminal conduct as a necessary part of his claim
in rem, was not required to give the respondent and the court at least some particulars of what that conduct was said to be... It seems to me to be essential that if there is to be a fair
trial that the respondent should know the case against him
in sufficient detail to enable him to prepare properly to meet it.»
Section 653 does not spell out any procedure for resolving a dispute as to quantum; its process is, ex facie, summary but I do not think that it precludes an inquiry by the
trial judge to establish the amount of compensation, so long as this can be done expeditiously and without turning the sentencing
proceedings into the equivalent of a
civil trial or into a reference
in a
civil proceeding.
The provision would extend the powers and rights of audience of DCWs by enabling them to conduct: - summary
trials in magistrates» courts; - certain
proceedings in magistrates» courts, including
proceedings relating to offences triable only on indictment by a judge and jury at the crown court; - applications and other
proceedings relating to «preventative
civil orders» such as anti-social behaviour orders; and - certain
proceedings (other than criminal
proceedings) assigned to the director of public prosecutions by the attorney general under the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, s 3 (2)(g).
Turning to the admission of hearsay evidence, at para 35 Lord Steyn added that the
proceedings were
civil under domestic law and Art 6 (right to fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), the Civil Evidence Act 1995 (CEA 1995), s 1 and the Magistrates» Court (Hearsay Evidence in Civil Proceedings) Rules 1999 (SI 1999/681) allowed the introduction of such evid
civil under domestic law and Art 6 (right to fair
trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), the
Civil Evidence Act 1995 (CEA 1995), s 1 and the Magistrates» Court (Hearsay Evidence in Civil Proceedings) Rules 1999 (SI 1999/681) allowed the introduction of such evid
Civil Evidence Act 1995 (CEA 1995), s 1 and the Magistrates» Court (Hearsay Evidence
in Civil Proceedings) Rules 1999 (SI 1999/681) allowed the introduction of such evid
Civil Proceedings) Rules 1999 (SI 1999/681) allowed the introduction of such evidence.
In Canada, though used in administrative proceedings, the technique has apparently not yet been used in civil litigation trial
In Canada, though used
in administrative proceedings, the technique has apparently not yet been used in civil litigation trial
in administrative
proceedings, the technique has apparently not yet been used
in civil litigation trial
in civil litigation
trials.
(b) the salutary effects of the order, including the effects on the right of
civil litigants to a fair
trial, outweigh its deleterious effects, including the effects on the right to free expression which includes the public interest
in open and accessible court
proceedings (the «proportionality» branch).
Duties included routine patrol activities, effecting arrests, conducting criminal and
civil investigations,
trial and case preparation, testifying
in various judicial and administrative
proceedings, using police computers.
Expert Consultant & Witness — Litigation Support Services Dr. Acklin provides expert consultation
in civil and criminal
proceedings, including case and file reviews, psychological research, work product reviews, witness preparation, and
trial consultation, including assistance
in the direct...