Sentences with phrase «trial is an asset to»

Not exact matches

Often, these calls - to - action lead to things like free ebooks, free whitepapers, free fact sheets, free webinars, free trials... basically, any content asset for which someone would be willing to exchange their information.

In their request filed Wednesday in probate court in Canton, Massachusetts, Dauman and Abrams said a rapid trial schedule is needed to resolve the dispute because the trust's assets are being threatened by Shari Redstone's «invalid attempt» to take control of its majority stakes in Viacom and CBS.

In those areas that we have mapped, it typically takes us a few hours to go from a mechanism - inspired idea for treating a disease to knowing the companies that might have relevant clinical and preclinical assets to license, the companies from whom a candidate could be commissioned, trial designs and endpoints, competing and complementary agents, current and future standard of care, market size, comparable pricing, financing strategy, and potential acquirers, all meant to enable a thoughtful first - pass assessment of whether an idea could be worth a much deeper assessment.

«America's asset is, simply risk taking and the use of optionality, this remarkable ability to engage in rational forms of trial and error, with no comparative shame in failing, starting again, and repeating failure.

While it may take trial and error, any new information that leads to their protection is an asset.

Cuomo also said that the state would look to speed the trial process, ban asset seizures unless an arrest is made, and bolster programs that help formerly incarcerated individuals with re-entry.

Today, the U.S. Appeals Court for the Second Circuit denied disgraced former Bronx Assemblyman Eric Stevenson's appeal of his federal trial judge's order seizing his pension contributions assets that can be used to pay his $ 22,000 restitution penalty.

He pleaded not guilty to 13 - count charges of false declaration of assets, and said he was on trial because of his emergence as senate president against the wish of certain people.

Danladi Umar, Code of Conduct Tribunal, CCT, chairman today threatened to jail supporters of the Senate President, Bukola Saraki who is facing trial over false assets declaration.

Some also believed that this led to the «sudden» trial of the Senate President by the Code of Conduct Tribunal, on allegations that Saraki made false declaration of his assets while being the governor of Kwara State between 2003 and 2007 for his first term, between 2007 and 2011 for his second term, and as a senator from 2011 to 2015.

Victims can sue, but their only recourse will ultimately be against the individuals who discriminated against them — some of whom might have left the company long before the cases go to trial, and others who may have limited assets and are unable to pay any damages.

Playing the mirror image of his breakthrough role as the soulful ex-con in Body Heat, Rourke is tightly wound as the violence - prone Michael Bosworth, who escapes custody during his high - profile trial with the aid of his attorney (Kelly Lynch), who's head over heels in love and in over her head with him, his brother (Elias Koteas), who's loyal to a fault, and his brother's partner (David Morse), a loose cannon who's more of a liability than an asset.

Dan: Yeah, that's a real kind of pervasive, unfortunate «trial by fire» concept that is out there where rookie teachers maybe kind of looked at as «sink or swim» or «meat to the grinder»... Pick your idiom of not really being valued out of the gate as prized community assets.

«Like Britain in the Industrial Revolution, America's asset is, simply, risk taking and the use of optionality, this remarkable ability to engage in rational forms of trial and error, with no comparative shame in failing again, starting again, and repeating failure.»

It's Linda Macklowe's turn to present her assets in the Macklowe divorce trial.

Where the damages awarded after a long trial are modest, it is possible for the adverse cost award to exceed the amount of damages, meaning that the plaintiff's personal assets are at risk.

Although the court utilizes the date of separation to identify marital assets, the presumptive date for valuation is the date of trial.

If your divorce proceeds to trial, a judge will be asked to divide assets and liabilities, determine whether alimony is appropriate, dictate a parenting plan to determine how and when a child will spend time with each parent, calculate child support, dissolve the bonds of marriage, and make other personal and private decisions.

It was thought that it was contrary to this spirit of «full faith and credit» (in Morguard's words, sort of) and administrative simplicity to allow defendants to wait in the bushes while the original court held a trial — even in default of appearance — and then attack jurisdiction only when the judgment came to be enforced in a place where the defendant had assets.

Indeed, several courts have held that regardless of the certainty that the tax liability will be incurred in the future if an asset is sold, liquidated or otherwise reduced to cash, the trial court is not required to speculate on or consider such tax consequences in the absence of proof that a taxable event has occurred during the marriage or will occur in connection with the division of the asset.

There are two main reasons why a couple may want to determine the division of marital assets without going to trial.

The trial judge accepted the proposal of O'Hara's counsel that the defendants be allowed to select one of three alternative forms of relief viz., (1) that Sales Leadership transfer all its assets to Junior Sales, or (2) that all the shares of Sales Leadership be transferred to Junior Sales, or (3) that twenty shares of Sales Leadership be transferred to O'Hara.

He has recently been involved in several significant cases, such as the lengthy trial to determine the allocation of Nortel Inc.'s assets.

While ultimate collection is still a subject to trial, is Chevron now effectively «locked» into Canada for the next x number of years, unable to reinvests its assets elsewhere?

The trial judge held that, owing to the lack of evidence, the assets could not be valued, and would not be taken into account for property division.

Under the active versus passive gain analysis, both parties are entitled to share in any passive gains or losses in property value during the litigation period and the court should value such assets as of the date of trial.

[49] It is my view that the wife should not have to face ongoing and undoubtedly costly litigation as a result of the husband's decision not to provide the judge with the necessary evidence to finalize the division of assets at the conclusion of the trial. . .

For example, they determine who will live in the family home, whether the family home be listed for sale, who will have custody of the children, how much child support should be paid, whether spousal support should be paid and if so in what amount, whether a spouse should be restrained from contacting the other spouse or disposing of assets pending trial, how a business should be run pending trial and / or whether there should be interim advances of monies to parties pending trial.

This is a very significant asset should your case proceed to trial.

Naturally many people go to court and argue that the Vancouver asset or real estate needs to be valued as of the time of separation and not trial because only one person contributed to that asset after separation.

In Blackett v. Blackett (1989), 40 B.C.L.R. (2d) 99 (C.A.), the Court of Appeal overturned the trial judge's decision that the husband should pay compensation to the wife using the date of separation to value shares in a company found to be a family asset.

Following a 13 - day trial in which the parties were self - represented, the SCJ judge held that although the husband had failed to disclose some assets, that non-disclosure would not have materially impacted the negotiations.

Whether you are entering into a separation agreement or going to trial, it is very important to know tax complications on asset division.

With respect to (1), the ONCA held that the trial judge's reasons were sufficient, noting that there was no basis on which to require security for spousal support in light of the husband's age (68) and the wife's own substantial assets.

CSR, which provides clinical trial research to pharmaceutical companies and is also known as Cetero Research, plans to sell its assets to lenders.

A court may order security for costs when there is good reason to believe that a corporate plaintiff has insufficient assets in Ontario to satisfy a costs award that a defendant may get at the trial, if successful.

Exercising its discretion in place of the trial judge, it ordered part of the receiver's remuneration to be paid, not out of assets subject to the receivership, but by the defendant commissioners.

However the trial judge specifically declined to find he could pierce the corporate veil: the husband's ownership and control alone were not sufficient to justify this, and there had been no impropriety linked to the use of the company structure to conceal assets.

Srebnick, who worked on the appeal with Miami attorney Richard Strafer, argued that defendants should be allowed to keep their bank accounts and other worldly possessions unless prosecutors can show before trial that the evidence supporting an indictment justifies the seizure of those assets.

3) Start with a premise: «The $ 10,000.00 Trial» — and then deconstruct that trial, looking to your data, to establish efficiencies to create the $ 10,000.00 trial, which most Canadians COULD afford in middle class and up — and offer the $ 10,000.00 trial structure as an alternative track where assets are less tanTrial» — and then deconstruct that trial, looking to your data, to establish efficiencies to create the $ 10,000.00 trial, which most Canadians COULD afford in middle class and up — and offer the $ 10,000.00 trial structure as an alternative track where assets are less tantrial, looking to your data, to establish efficiencies to create the $ 10,000.00 trial, which most Canadians COULD afford in middle class and up — and offer the $ 10,000.00 trial structure as an alternative track where assets are less tantrial, which most Canadians COULD afford in middle class and up — and offer the $ 10,000.00 trial structure as an alternative track where assets are less tantrial structure as an alternative track where assets are less tan $ X.

The award was reversed because the trial judge was unaware of a capped $ 6,000 fee arrangement between ex-wife and her counsel, it was unclear if consideration was given to any net income received by husband from assets, and it was unclear if the trial court considered wife's monthly income.

[13] The Court of Appeal held there was ample evidence upon which the trial judge could conclude that the defendant had engaged in a «deliberate course of conduct to strip Ruggieri Engineering of its exigible assets.»

The husband was found at trial to have generated assets of # 205 million.

SETL Development Ltd CEO Peter Randall said that the trials are an «important step» in bringing blockchain technology to the asset management sector, with benefits including lower costs and increased transparency and workflow.

The trial is the latest effort to demonstrate how blockchain tech could be applied to post-trade processes, during which transactions are approved and the assets and cash involved are exchanged between the parties after a trade has taken place.

And as to financial considerations, will decisions on division of community assets and support be the result of a careful plan, worked out with a divorce financial professional, advising both spouses, or of horse - trading between adversary lawyers on the eve of trial?

In making an equitable apportionment of marital property, the family court must give weight in such proportion as it finds appropriate to all of the following factors: (1) the duration of the marriage along with the ages of the parties at the time of the marriage and at the time of the divorce; (2) marital misconduct or fault of either or both parties, if the misconduct affects or has affected the economic circumstances of the parties or contributed to the breakup of the marriage; (3) the value of the marital property and the contribution of each spouse to the acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation in value of the marital property, including the contribution of the spouse as homemaker; (4) the income of each spouse, the earning potential of each spouse, and the opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets; (5) the health, both physical and emotional, of each spouse; (6) either spouse's need for additional training or education in order to achieve that spouse's income potential; (7) the non marital property of each spouse; (8) the existence or nonexistence of vested retirement benefits for each or either spouse; (9) whether separate maintenance or alimony has been awarded; (10) the desirability of awarding the family home as part of equitable distribution or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to the spouse having custody of any children; (11) the tax consequences to each or either party as a result of equitable apportionment; (12) the existence and extent of any prior support obligations; (13) liens and any other encumbrances upon the marital property and any other existing debts; (14) child custody arrangements and obligations at the time of the entry of the order; and (15) such other relevant factors as the trial court shall expressly enumerate in its order.

Plus, trial judges are forced to choose a rather limited range of options, whereas Collaborative Divorce enables spouses to develop creative solutions — including those related to child custody, support, asset allocation, and other important issues that arise in a divorce.