Sentences with phrase «trial judge ruled»

The trial judge ruled that the vendor must transfer the property but an appeal court overturned the trial judge, since the purchaser was not ready and willing to complete the purchase.

This was based on information that the increase in advertising and promotion for the first two years of the agreement was $ 72,000, and the trial judge ruled that 50 per cent of the additional costs were recoverable as damages.

At trial the judge ruled that although the inspector had conducted the inspection in a professional, thorough and conscientious manner, he had still fallen short of meeting the standard of care that was expected of him — that of an ordinary, reasonable and prudent home inspector in the same circumstances.

At trial the judge ruled that the entire agreement clause barred the action.

Oracle had originally sued Google for both patent infringement and copyright infringement, but a jury found the patents were not infringed and the trial judge ruled that the APIs were not copyrightable.

The trial judge ruled that the issue was non-justiciable, despite the fact that individual rights depended on it.

The trial judge ruled that members of a Parish can change over time and therefore the Parish could not simply choose to sever itself from the Diocese based on the whims of the congregation at any particular time.

As PS called no evidence, the trial judge ruled that a prima facie case had been made out and convicted the accused.

The trial judge ruled that the hearing fees were unconstitutional, and were not saved by the exemption in Rule 20 - 5.

At the Westerhof trial, the trial judge ruled inadmissible opinion evidence from experts who had not complied with Rule 53.03 including various medical practitioners, a neurologist, and a road safety consultant / driving therapist intern.

The trial judge ruled the mandatory minimum sentence required by s. 5 (3)(a)(i)(D) constituted cruel and unusual punishment contrary to s. 12 of the Charter; it was not a reasonable limit within the meaning of s. 1 of the Charter and was declared of no force and effect.

I do not, however, find it appropriate to rely upon the slightly earlier episode detailed in my Brother STEWART's opinion, ante at 394 U. S. 157, as the trial judge ruled the uncontradicted supporting testimony inadmissible.

The trial judge ruled that the inventory search was reasonable and that, even if Harflett's right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure under s. 8 of the Charter of Rights was breached, the test for exclusion under s. 24 (2) favoured admission of the marihuana.

The trial judge ruled that Umberto Management should have given Ms. Chapple 15 months» notice, and therefore she was entitled to 15 months» pay.

In the recent Ontario case of Maxwell v. Luck, the trial judge ruled that the insurance company breached its statutory duty to attempt to settle the claim expeditiously.

However, the Gapinski family accepted a compromise, and the trial judge ruled that the defendants could have separate counsel, separate pleadings and separate experts if they were otherwise barred from double - teaming at trial.

The trial judge ruled that it was not relevant to consider whether the defendant had been prejudiced.

The trial judge ruled: I will now focus on the main argument in this matter, which is the violation as a result of the statutorily compelled statements.

The trial judge ruled against Rascal, who later won on appeal.

The trial judge ruled that Coote's expert was inadequate and granted summary judgment in favor of Dr. Miller and Midwest Orthopaedics Consultants.

The trial judge ruled the case was statute - barred.

The trial judge ruled against claimants, and the B.C.C.A. decision upheld the decision.

32 The trial judge ruled that the proffered statements were prior inconsistent statements and permitted the Crown to cross-examine Dam on their contents.

The trial judge ruled the husband's reasons for seeking a continuance of the trial were not substantiated by the letters.

The trial judge ruled the evidence inadmissible, and Jackson's appeal was dismissed.

Brown held the discipline panel «failed to give meaningful consideration to how the trial judge ruled on the complaints by the OSC about Mr. Groia's conduct and how Mr. Groia responded to the trial judge's rulings on those complaints.»

The trial judge ruled that Waterman should have been given 20 months» notice and awarded damages.

At trial the judge ruled that although the inspector had conducted the inspection in a professional, thorough and conscientious manner, he had still fallen short of meeting the standard of care that was expected of him — that of an ordinary, reasonable and prudent home inspector in the same circumstances.

[After a trial judge ruled on Aug. 4 that the proposed amendments could be placed on the November ballot, the plaintiffs appealed the decision.

A trial judge ruled that the owners were protected in making this decision by the First Amendment.

But a New Brunswick trial judge ruled that the charge violated constitutional law, overturning a ban on bringing alcohol across provincial boundaries.

Among other things, the trial judge ruled that the two weeks» notice the employees had offered was woefully insufficient.

Additionally, if a trial judge rules this evidence admissible and you're convicted it is possible it could be construed as harmless error on appeal.

The Court of Appeal overturned the trial judges ruling, noting that the broker was responsible only to make appropriate inquiries to determine the kinds of coverage required of the insured and to advise of the appropriate options available that would satisfy the needs of the insured.

The initial claim was dismissed in December 1998, with the trial judge ruling that the ancestors of the Yorta Yorta people had lost their culture to such an extent that native title could no longer be recognised.

Not exact matches

At the opening of the trial in Rome, the U.S. investment bank the other defendants asked a three - judge panel at the Court of Accounts, which rules on abuses of public funds, to reject the case in an acknowledgement that the judges do not have jurisdiction, Marco Fratini, one of the judges, said.

For instance, we were once in a proceeding in which the judge made a ruling on evidence presented at trial by opposing counsel that was going to fundamentally change the outcome of the case.

«These beverages are to be provided to the jurors each evening only if all trial proceedings have concluded for the day,» the judge wrote, making sure nobody could skirt the rules through legal loopholes: «The jurors are not authorized to order an alcoholic beverage for consumption by another juror.»

In March, two judges ruled Liss - Riordan's Uber and Lyft cases will go to a trial by jury.

Today the Delaware Chancery Court judge hearing the trial said that before March 28 he'd rule on whether Barry Diller's proposed breakup of IAC into five independent companies violated his contract...

In 2006, a judge ruled previous testimony could not be used in the new trial.

On the international front, a British judge ruled in Goldman's favor in October after a trial on accusations that the firm had pushed Libya's sovereign wealth fund into costly, improper investments.

A former Florida Atlantic University professor is not entitled to a new trial over his claim that he was fired in retaliation for calling the Sandy Hook massacre a hoax, a judge ruled Tuesday.

As deliberations close in the AT&T antitrust trial, Judge Richard Leon says he will issue a ruling by June 12.

It was never really expected that this judge, Pamela Campbell, who presided over the trial, was going to rule against Hogan (real name, Terry Bollea).

A federal judge ruled three business associates of a financial technology company are likely to lose at a trial over government accusations that they sold unregistered stock in the firm after a rally linked to cryptocurrency.

The first of the bullion bank traders being brought to trial on charges of manipulating the U.S. gold and futures markets, Andy Flotron, has been treated unfairly by the prosecution, a federal judge has ruled.

While Waymo wanted to bring up software trade secrets the company believed Uber took as part of this lawsuit — which is about self - driving hardware called lidar — the judge said it would add too much to this trial but ruled the company could file a separate lawsuit related to software after this ended.

This would mean, for instance, that participants in an economic transaction are bound to halt their activity whenever any one of them or any affected individual objects to it, or a criminal court judge is bound to halt the trial's proceedings if the accused dissents from a specific rule of the judicial system.

Deputy High Court judge Rowena Collins - Rice, who considered rival claims during a trial in London earlier this month, is scheduled to deliver a ruling today.