Sentences with phrase «trial judgment»

The phrase "trial judgment" refers to the final decision made by a judge or jury in a court case after all the evidence has been presented and both sides have argued their positions. It determines whether the defendant is found guilty or not guilty in a criminal trial, or who wins and who loses in a civil trial. Full definition
And after all, appellate courts review trial judgments without so much hassle and confusion; I just do not accept that administrative law couldn't be the same.
Horst Tyson Dahlem Professional Corporation v. John F. Schneider Professional Corporation (Canmore Legal Services), 2017 ABCA 97 (Court of Appeal decision affirming trial judgment.
In 2010, he tried the case of Sullins v. Exxon Mobil Corporation in the Northern District of California, obtaining a jury verdict for the defense in July 2010 and a bench trial judgment for the defense on the remaining claims in January 2011.
This article argues that it is time for the SCSL to establish an independent fact finding commission, with a narrowly framed and time limited mandate, to establish the truth, or falsity, of the allegation that Alternate Judge Sow made during the delivery of the Taylor Trial judgment that there were no (serious) deliberations by the three judges who convicted the accused and sentenced him to 50 years imprisonment.
[1] This is an appeal from a summary trial judgment that found the City of Salmon Arm («City») liable in negligence for injuries suffered when Cindy Lee Binette tripped over the metal base of a broken traffic sign that was protruding from the sidewalk.
He then sued American National based on a «failure to settle» theory and obtained a nearly $ 3 million bench trial judgment against the company.
I've been thinking about this question a great deal following the story of Angela Cardinal — the sexual assault victim who was incarcerated for 5 nights to ensure her testimony in a preliminary inquiry (trial judgment here; media reports here and here).
The ONCA attempted to decipher the somewhat strange trial judgment and in the end, determined that no income should be imputed to the wife and that the high end of the SSAGs was appropriate.
In Canadian National Railway Co. v. Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada (2007), 85 O.R. (3d) 185 (C.A.) the Court of Appeal overturned a comprehensive trial judgment on the basis that the trial judge had failed to consider admissions made by a representative of one of the parties.
Furthermore, while researching my somewhat obscure moot topic, I was more interested in things like 40 year old trial judgments than the sort of up - to - date law I now use as an articling student.
She fought him, she bit him and, ultimately, managed to get his phone, call 9 -1-1 and throw it across the room, screaming as loudly as she could until the police came (Trial judgment para. 17 - 27, account of Ms. Cardinal and accepted by the trial judge).
... judicial opinions, especially trial judgments, differ from the kind of writings that traditionally attract copyright protection, with the concomitant demands of originality and attribution of sources.
In the bench trial judgment, there was no award for medical expenses, although the hospital bills were presented to the judge by stipulation of the parties.
As the trial judgment below concerned indictable offences and contained no errors of law, Ms. George's acquittals were sustained and her appeal was allowed.
The defendant Simonson appeals the trial judgment finding him personally liable for the investors» losses:...
Then dealing with the merits, the SCC unanimously varied the trial judgment so that the plaintiff obtained judgment only against one of the defendants.
In the result, I would allow the appeal, but vary the trial judgment
In the Nyiramasuhuko et al. case, more than two and a half years passed between the close of evidence and the issuing of the trial judgment.
They are entitled to an expeditious trial, so there is no time to lose before issuing the trial judgment.
After reserving its decision for ten months, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the trial judgment — in part.
In particular, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the trial judgment that Deloitte was liable to Livent and its stakeholders for approximately $ 40 million in damages suffered as a result of Deloitte's clean audit opinion on Livent's 1997 financial statement.
This appeal was dismissed and the trial judgment was upheld.
(Click here to read my post on the trial judgment).
Instead, the attorney fees will be deducted from your settlement or trial judgment.
The matter then came before a judge to confirm the Master's decision (it is not technically an appeal of the Master's trial judgment, but in practice it's very similar).
$ 1,141,000.00 TRIAL JUDGMENT — Breach of Fiduciary Duty This case involved allegations of a breach of fiduciary obligations.
The trial judgment, however, reminded me of that line from the Quebec secession reference about the «underlying constitutional principles» that were said to have «full legal force» in the in the partition reference.
So mediation can produce a just resolution, at least as often (I would think) as a trial judgment (or final appellate judgment).
In the trial judgment in Broesky, Mackinnon J. dismissed the plaintiff's action after finding that she did NOT retain the solicitor to prosecute her tort action or her SAB claim, but rather only her action for disability benefits.
The OBA quickly realized that the trial judgment in MacIssac v. Salo was wrong, and intervened in the appeal to the Court of Appeal.
«In the result, by supplementary reasons dated March 22, 2016, the trial judge directed that the formal judgment provide that the damages awarded ($ 45 million) may be reduced on further motion to the Superior Court, if necessary, following the final disposition of any appeal from the trial judgment, to settle the process for determining the number and identity of the dealers entitled to share in that award and the calculation of those damages.»
Mr. Heffernan obtained a trial judgment affirming both title and boundaries for a 120 - acre subdivision in a case which marshalled over a century's worth of complex title records and boundary evidence.
The (mammoth) trial judgment is here, standing at 2615 pages that not even Karadzic's lawyers will read as a whole; the more accessible summary is here.
It seems to me that to maintain the lines of distinction, an appellate court should try to stay away from adding its views about the correctness of the trial judgment, where doing so is not required based on the appellate standard of review.
The balance of the decision thus focused not on errors of law made by the SCJ appeal judge but rather focused on the trial judgment itself.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z