He has experience with all phases of the dispute process, including initial investigation of the facts, developing strategy, assisting with both document and electronic discovery, analysing and explaining complex data, and providing deposition and
trial testimony as an expert witness.
Not exact matches
Gary wrong again, Gary wrong again: I was a guest before this on this blog: Even check out Martin Zender; The World's most outspoken bible scholar facebook; You will find me there; he knows me, and his crew knows of me; Father has others too that have been with me for years that are not in my city through their ministries also that have come up along side of me, but I do not want you to come against them
as they have their own
trials to overcome, therefore; no names given there, they also know me and my
testimony: I am God's workmanship therefore, I was brought up in Christ along side witnesses
as His
testimony: Gary; this is going to be shocking, but because God does not inform you of a thing, means to me, that He has kept very much from you: Now why would that be?
If
testimony has a relation to a
trial, the place of the
trial of Jesus would suffice to recall it (cf. the accusation of the false
testimony as well
as the stirring up of false witnesses to the
trial); but the whole ministry of Jesus is a
trial.
But it is the same even with historical interpretation of
testimonies; the sort of tribunal before which witnesses are summoned and the sort of
trial by which
testimony gives proof are placed under the same categories of the modality of judgment
as the criteriology of the divine.
As C. S Song explains regarding Taiwan, «Christians brought to
trial because of their allegiance to Jesus have changed a military court into a court of
testimony!»
That self - consciousness is held in abeyance by whatever decision, by whatever choice, or whatever
trial where it is made to answer a summons — even that which is the appearance of the absolute — does not express the feebleness of the proof of
testimony,
as in Aristotle, but the finitude of the consciousness to which absolute knowledge is refused.
As the corruption
trial of his former close aide and confidant Joe Percoco played out in New York City, Gov. Andrew Cuomo stuck to a largely similar script when asked about the details of the
testimony.
As someone who sat through every minute of
testimony during that
trial, I had my doubts from the very beginning.
Through
testimony, photographs and emails, prosecutors in Joseph Percoco's ongoing federal corruption
trial have sought to portray him
as having more sway in the Cuomo administration than anyone other than Cuomo himself.
By the time that Todd Howe, the Albany insider turned government witness, begins his
testimony in the Percoco
trial this coming week, his reputation
as a routine liar will have already preceded him.
Restaurateur Harendra Singh on Thursday finished his
testimony in the federal corruption
trial of former Nassau County Executive Edward Mangano, his wife, Linda, and former Oyster Bay Town Supervisor John Venditto, after 13 days on the stand and
as the prosecution challenged two crucial sets of evidence submitted by defense attorneys.
At both original
trials,
testimony highlighted how the company viewed its massive donations
as a cost of doing business with politicians who supported multimillion dollar tax breaks from which it benefited.
Had Silver's lawyers made any attempt to portray Silver
as a man of character at the
trial, U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara would have undoubtedly seen to it that the Sheldon E. Silver farce had made it into the court record, probably during the
testimony of Michael Whyland, Silver's spokesman who led the media attack on the Times story.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo's political enemies are launching an all - out, online blitz
as the corruption
trial of a former top aide heats up this week with
testimony from the prosecution's star witness.
Now, the
testimony of two witnesses at a federal
trial unfolding in Newark has placed Cuomo in close proximity to what has principally been a New Jersey - based narrative of lies, retribution and planned cover ups
as early
as October of 2013 — just weeks after the sudden closure of several lanes on the New Jersey side of the George Washington Bridge.
As Monday morning, and
testimony by Barry Edelstein of Structured Growth Capital, wore on, a few courtroom spectators at the
trial of former Nassau County Executive Edward Mangano, his wife, Linda, and former Oyster Bay Supervisor John Venditto seemed to be finding it difficult to keep their eyes open.
Through
testimony, photographs and emails, prosecutors in Percoco's ongoing federal corruption
trial have sought to portray him
as having more sway in the administration than anyone else other than Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo himself.
Silver's defense team previously argued the
testimony of Lisa Reid, executive director and counsel to the state Legislative Ethics Commission, regarding Silver's financial disclosure forms was irrelevant,
as the Manhattan Democrat wasn't on
trial for failing to appropriately file state forms.
More than two years after the New York City police officer Brian Moore was fatally shot while on patrol in Queens, his fellow officers relived that night,
as testimony began yesterday in the
trial of the man prosecutors say killed him with two bullets to the head from a silver revolver.
The staff member, Victor E. Franco, in his second day of
testimony at the
trial in Manhattan, elaborated on the budgetary process,
as prosecutors sought to illustrate that Mr. Silver controlled it all with little transparency or accountability, particularly on the Health Department grants that are the focus of the case.
Howe's
testimony in the third week of the
trial was at times plodding,
as Assistant U.S. Attorney Janis Echenberg introduced evidence for jurors.
For his part, Fitzpatrick doesn't seem interested in actually retiring yet: he spoke briefly
as he was leaving court during the second day of
testimony in a 33 - year - old cold case
trial.
When The Post raised the issue earlier this week, Shafran insisted «the governor's decisions are not influenced by contributions,
as testimony in the
trials showed.»
Despite his comments about representing «little people,» Silver was hired
as of counsel at the firm Weitz & Luxenberg to bring «prestige» —
as one of the name partners put it in
testimony during the
trial — and he acted primarily
as a so - called rainmaker, bringing in lucrative referrals for mesothelioma cases, which paid him a portion of the proceeds from any judgment or settlement.
Perez - Melgosa, stunned and horrified at finding herself,
as she said in
trial testimony, «suddenly severed from a career that makes me who I am,» went to see OSI Director Anne Ackenhusen, hoping, she testified at the
trial, to get underway an investigation that she believed would reject the allegation of changing data.
Yet, during Perez - Melgosa's time in Nickerson's lab,
as sworn
trial testimony established, she never received a performance review, nor any formal warning of problems with her work or opportunities to correct deficiencies,
as the UW personnel policy requires.
Neal and Christy Haynes spent $ 200,000 on their defense — retaining Yazbak and Uscinski
as well
as experts in pediatric ophthalmology and neuroradiology to provide expert
testimony — and endured 14 months of
trials and hearings.
Spinotti's point - of - view camera trails after Bergman
as he ricochets from New York to Kentucky to Mississippi, hoping to get Wigand subpoenaed for a civil
trial in order to force his
testimony onto the public record.
Tommy, who frequently bunks off work to attend the Gotti
trial, soon begins to see an opportunity emerging
as testimony's from high ranking mafia henchmen, suggest mob social clubs are gun free zones.
During the Vergara
trial, attempting to do away with teacher due process rights, sworn
testimony (during discovery) was given that,
as stated above, thinking administrators were able to successfully ease teachers out of the profession, careful scrutiny of beginning teachers by competent administrators prevented districts from hiring teachers who did not fit the district, and the average time to dismiss a teacher via the legal process was months and tens of thousands of dollars.
Consistent with NSBA's position
as outlined in its «friend of the court» (amicus) brief, Justice Samuel Alito delivered the Court's unanimous opinion and found that the school officials in this case should not be viewed
as law enforcement agents, and the statements made by the young child to the teachers were not given with the «primary purpose of creating an out - of - court substitute for
trial testimony.»
This shuffle of teachers is known
as the «Dance of the Lemons» and was part of the
testimony in the Vergara
trial.
As a widely - published expert and now emeritus professor at Arizona State University, Berliner offered helpful
testimony for the defense in the Vergara v. California
trial, which is focused on how to minimize the impact and number of ineffective teachers in California public schools — at least until his cross-examination.
While the district withdrew
as a defendant in the case before the
trial started, she was called by the defense in an effort to impeach the
testimony of a plaintiffs» witness, Nicholas Melvoin, a former LA Unified teacher at Markham Middle School in Watts, who had testified last month that teacher layoffs in 2009 resulted in effective teachers being dismissed and morale at the school eroded.
The work of Faculty members teaching these subjects, and grappling routinely with tough questioning by students
as well
as seminar panels, lends itself to
testimony before juries and to bench
trials.
As part of our rescue work we also provide investigation, evidence collection and expert
testimony for any legal hearings or criminal
trials related to the case.
During this frantic, high - stakes class
trial, you must use the evidence that you have gathered during your investigations,
as well
as your classmates»
testimonies, to literally shoot down your opponent's arguments.
«Video products and services will be available through www.courtroomview.com and the Law.com network, allowing subscribers to view full
trials or key elements such
as opening and closing arguments and expert witness
testimony, along with all exhibits presented to the jury.
New York is one of 10 states where prosecutors can wait until a
trial to turn over witness names and statements, grand jury
testimony and other evidence known
as discovery, which backs up criminal charges.
And at WSJ Law Blog, Dan Slater analyzes some of the discrepancies between Andrew Fastow's
testimony at the Enron
trial and the 420 pages of investigative notes that the government did not produce, in violation of its obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence
as required by Brady v. Maryland.
It transfers Davis» habeas corpus petition to the U.S. District Court in Georgia and instructs the court to «receive
testimony and make findings of fact
as to whether evidence that could not have been obtained at the time of
trial clearly establishes petitioner's innocence.»
As a result of this ruling, the plaintiff's claim will be permitted to proceed toward a
trial, although the defense will have the opportunity to bolster their expert
testimony with the results of the physical examination.
As to whether the
trial court, applying its discretion, should allow or disallow a new expert witness in the refiled case, the criteria are: surprise, prejudice, the nature of the
testimony, the diligence of the adverse party, the timeliness of the objection and the good faith of the party seeking to add the new witness.
Also known
as the «case - in - chief,» the witness
testimony and cross-examination process is the part of a
trial that most people are familiar with thanks to pop culture.
We have also defended those opinions by
testimony in depositions and at
trial as qualified expert witnesses.
If the answer or information is being read into evidence to show that a witness's
testimony at
trial is not to be believed, answers or information given by the witness earlier must be put to the witness
as sections 20 and 21 of the Evidence Act require.
As any
trial lawyer will tell you, getting expert
testimony admitted has been tougher since 1993, when the Supreme Court decided in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals that scientific
testimony must be not only relevant, but reliable.
More computer forensics information is expected to come up during
testimony as the
trial wraps up next week.
The longer between an event and
trial, the more unreliable the
testimony becomes,
as the brain's need to make sense of history and rationalize past behavior can put certainty around a recollection that at the time was uncertain.
As any
trial lawyer will tell you, getting expert
testimony admitted has been tougher since -LSB-...]