Sentences with phrase «trial the judge never»

The trial judge never mentioned what Clements says is the manner in which the but - for test is to be applied.

The trial judge never identified the Charter - protected interests affected by the multiple Charter breaches.

Not exact matches

It was never really expected that this judge, Pamela Campbell, who presided over the trial, was going to rule against Hogan (real name, Terry Bollea).

After President Trump took office in 2017, the challenge in Judge Hanen's court had not yet reached a final legal conclusion because there had never been a full - scale trial on the legality of the November 2014 actions by President Obama.

The rich, influential and well - counseled rarely meet a trial judge and almost never see the gas chamber or electric chair.

During the Catonsville trial we got into a long dialogue in court with the judge that I'll never forget.

«A lot of this criticism is coming from people who never bothered to attend the trials,» says Hampton prosecutor Colleen Killilea, who gained a measure of local fame by urging the judge to «just do it» to Iverson after he imprudently jetted to a Nike - sponsored tournament when his trial broke for the weekend.

Then in April, 2017, these acts of impunity, rose to the peak when the Delta Forces, in the Ashanti Region, invaded court premises to set free their members who were standing trial, an act of contempt, never heard before in the history of the county, brutalizing officers on duty causing the presiding judge to run for her life.

The SC is not a trial court but an appellate one and should never constitute itself into a prosecutor, judge and jury and sit in its own cause as if it is the Chief's Palace where the accused is hauled before the Chief and his elders, tried, found guilty and ordered to present seventy - two rams and seventy - two bottles of schnapps to pacify the gods and ancestors in a constitutional democracy.

Also on Friday, in response to a question from the judge — a standard inquiry before trial — a prosecutor, Carrie H. Cohen, said that no plea offer had been made to Mr. Silver and that the defense had never asked for one.

Judge Caproni would not describe the non-parties except to say, «We are confident that at least one of them was never mentioned during trial.»

In a helpful decision for employers looking to minimize wasteful litigation (Frith v. Cable Birdge Enterprises Limited, 2013 ONSC 6436), an Ontario Divisional Court Judge overturned a trial court judge's decision that a plaintiff could puruse her employer for termination pay (notice and severance) before the Ontario Ministry of Labour (MOL) and the Superior Court even though her complaint before the MOL was never adjudicated (it appears she withdrew her complaint months after filingJudge overturned a trial court judge's decision that a plaintiff could puruse her employer for termination pay (notice and severance) before the Ontario Ministry of Labour (MOL) and the Superior Court even though her complaint before the MOL was never adjudicated (it appears she withdrew her complaint months after filingjudge's decision that a plaintiff could puruse her employer for termination pay (notice and severance) before the Ontario Ministry of Labour (MOL) and the Superior Court even though her complaint before the MOL was never adjudicated (it appears she withdrew her complaint months after filing it).

Despite the defendants» allegation that a substituted buyer of the location constituted fraud, the trial judge found that the firm's clients never engaged in fraud and did not breach the agreement in any respect.

«The fact is, almost all cases settle before trial,» says Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola with the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. «That means judges» and magistrate judges» rulings on discovery never get expiation on appeal.

But the trial judge dismissed the case for lack of personal jurisdiction, which undoubtedly left the defendants happy as pigs in... oh, never mind.

That means being honest with the judge, opposing counsel, oftentimes the insurance company representative (which I have found is always the person behind the scenes controlling the money decisions and is the reason the case is going to trial; the powerful decision - maker who the judge and jury never meet or even get to know about), and most importantly, the jury.

About 98 percent of civil cases never go to trial, the judge says.

Known as acquitted and uncharged conduct sentencing, the practice is raising a sharp question among legal scholars: Should federal judges dole out tougher sentences based on accusations that jurors rejected or never heard during trial?

The husband believed that the trial judge had committed a legal error in issuing this injunction and that, under the law, the prohibition should never have been put in place.

Everyone makes mistakes, and expecting trial judges to never error, or seeking to defrock them if they error on occasion, is folly.

U.S. Patent No. 7,479,949 on a «touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics» (which Apple wanted to call «the Jobs patent» in a trial in Judge Posner's court that never took place)

The husband, self - represented on appeal, argued that the trial judge made various errors such as ordering child support in favor of the wife despite her never suffering an economic disadvantage from the marriage -LRB-...?).

R. v. James, 2014 SCC 5 (35373) Moldaver J.: ``... the trial judge's reliance on evidence that did not form part of the record may have coloured his thinking on the issue of consent, particularly in assessing whether the complainant may have consented to sexual relations but forgot that she had done so due to memory blackout, or, as she claimed, that she was unconscious at all material times and never consented to sexual relations.

The lower court credited client's declaration that he never signed the retainer; without such a contractual relationship, no recovery could be allowed, reasoned the trial judge.

The trial judge deferred to a «highly manipulative» and «intransigent» parent who would clearly never permit her child to have any sort of relationship with her father.

The trial judges in both cases referred extensively to my case of Cobb v. Martin Estate, 2017 ONCA 717 — a case that I will never forget.

As an aside, exactly how is it possible to appeal a case, and have the appellate judge be the EXACT SAME guy who presided over the original trial and made statements that Avery should never be free to walk the streets again?

It was open to the trial judge on the evidentiary record to conclude there were sound reasons for disbelieving Bergman's claim that he never agreed to Rabinowitz's defamation campaign, and was unaware of it until April 2009.

I have never met the trial judge (the Hon. Charbonneau) or any of the other judges involved against whom accusations of reasonable apprehension of bias were leveled.

The Walker Estate version of a material contribution test, whatever it meant or now means, was never the Athey version, whatever some trial or appellate judges might have thought or claimed.

The trial judge had assumed the reason for the dishonesty — an explanation was never given by the Crown.

[23] The appellant's second submission is that the trial judge wrongly presumed co-parenting was appropriate even though Jacob had never been solely in his father's care.

If you go to trial, you never know what the judge will do.

The trial judge deferred to a «highly manipulative» and «intransigent» parent who would clearly never permit her child to have any sort of relationship with her father....