The statute setting a $ 250,000 limit on punitive damages awards violated the right to jury
trial under the State Constitution.
Not exact matches
The landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision Gideon v. Wainwright determined it to be an «obvious truth» that criminal defendants can not get a fair
trial without a lawyer and mandated all
states under the
Constitution to provide attorneys for defendants unable to afford their own lawyers.
Kentucky must equalize spending among school districts, revise its tax system, and significantly boost its share of school revenues if it is to fulfill its obligation to children
under the
state constitution, an advisory committee appointed by a
state trial judge has concluded.
Meanwhile, a
trial just wrapped up in
state court in Hartford in a lawsuit accusing the
state of underfunding low - performing neighborhood schools and asking the court to set a standard for educational quality required
under the
state constitution.
Nelson reminds me of
State v. Lessley, the case from a few years ago which addressed whether the state has the power under the Minnesota constitution to veto a defendant's decision to waive a jury t
State v. Lessley, the case from a few years ago which addressed whether the
state has the power under the Minnesota constitution to veto a defendant's decision to waive a jury t
state has the power
under the Minnesota
constitution to veto a defendant's decision to waive a jury
trial.
Smith has asked a federal district court in Nashville to certify the
trial - by - jury question
under the
state constitution to the Tennessee Supreme Court, which will decide that constitutional law question while the rest of the case remains in federal court.
In Walker v Sauvinet, 92 U.S. 90 (1876), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the right to a jury
trial guaranteed
under the Seventh Amendment to the
Constitution did not apply to
states.
The split - recovery statute allocating 60 % of punitive damages award to the
state did not violate the right to a remedy, the right to a jury trial, the takings or tax provisions, or the separation of powers under the State Constitu
state did not violate the right to a remedy, the right to a jury
trial, the takings or tax provisions, or the separation of powers
under the
State Constitu
State Constitution.
Insurance Department had authority
under 40 P. S. § 2000 to adopt this regulation which requires inclusion of an arbitration clause in Uninsured Motorist Coverage; the arbitration requirement did not violate the rights to jury
trial under the United
States or Pennsylvania
Constitutions.