Sentences with phrase «trial verdicts in favor»

He brings Reed Smith experience in obtaining bench and jury trial verdicts in favor of corporate defendants in discrimination, retaliation, harassment, and wrongful termination cases.

Not exact matches

The Manhattan federal court jury returned the verdict after a three - week trial in which prosecutors claimed that the 71 - year - old Democrat repeatedly promised the favors to enrich himself.

As one example of a defective product case, our firm and another law firm took a case to trial that resulted in a $ 19 million verdict in our client's favor.

The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs on the contract claim, so the jury had to decide the amount of compensatory damages and the fraud and punitive damages claims.

Most of the time we are able to negotiate fair settlements for our clients (the vast majority of injury claims in the U.S. are resolved in this way), but we are always ready, willing and able to go to trial for our clients in order to seek a jury verdict in their favor.

As a result, the court reversed the $ 2 million judgment and remanded the case back to the trial court for entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of our client.

Obtained a defense verdict in favor of the railroad company after an eight day jury trial.

In Colorado, U.S. District Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch was so infuriated by the trial conduct of counsel for Medtronic Navigation Inc. that he had already overturned a jury's $ 51 million verdict in its favor, as The Denver Post reportIn Colorado, U.S. District Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch was so infuriated by the trial conduct of counsel for Medtronic Navigation Inc. that he had already overturned a jury's $ 51 million verdict in its favor, as The Denver Post reportin its favor, as The Denver Post reports.

After a seven - day trial in which eight physicians testified, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants after deliberating for less than an hour.

Received a defense verdict on jury trial in favor of an employer accused of employment discrimination by the EEOC.

After a two and a half month trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Computers Plus and awarded it damages for the full value of its business.

The case proceeded to a jury trial, where a verdict was issued in the plaintiff's favor.

The respondents in Tyson Foods were certified as a class, and a verdict was returned in their favor at trial.

After a ten - day jury trial, a Cook County jury returned a verdict in favor of the family.

In the event that they refuse to pay you a fair settlement out of court, we may even be able to take the case to trial to fight for a jury verdict in your favoIn the event that they refuse to pay you a fair settlement out of court, we may even be able to take the case to trial to fight for a jury verdict in your favoin your favor.

Provided research, briefing and trial support, including drafting of jury instructions, trial brief, and motions in limine, in a case in Mayes County, Oklahoma, in which a defense verdict was obtained in favor of a loss prevention investigator who was an employee of a shoe retailer.

After a trial lasting for five days, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

The jury returned its verdict in favor of the man on Jan. 11, after a five - day trial.

After a five day trial, the case went to verdict and the jury found in favor of the defendant.

The Eighth Circuit United States Court of Appeals recently released an opinion affirming a jury verdict in favor of a defendant after a trial was held on the plaintiffs» allegations surrounding the death of their 23 - month - old son.

Obtained a defense verdict in favor of a major Orlando theme park following a seven - day jury trial.

The plaintiffs» product liability and negligence claims went to trial, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant.

The North Carolina Court of Appeals unanimously reversed the trial court's denial of the judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of the D...

Obtained a verdict in favor of the City of Cleveland after a three - week trial resulting in the then - largest eminent domain challenge in Ohio, which preserved property for future airport expansion

His trial results include a jury verdict of more than $ 4.1 million in favor of a the family of a 42 - year - old mother of three who was killed in an automobile collision.

After two week jury trial, awarded complete defense verdict ($ 0.00 award) in favor of architect - client in construction litigation lawsuit involving allegations of architect's professional negligence.

The lower court vacated the previous verdict and ordered either a new trial or a judgment in favor of plaintiff as a matter of law.

A jury trial commenced, and the verdict was in favor of PURE.

Obtained a jury verdict in favor of Sempra Generation on all counts following a four - week jury trial in a case challenging Sempra's $ 6.6 billion energy supply contract with the California Department of Water Resources.

The Pennsylvania Superior Court vacated an adverse jury verdict and remanded for the entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of Kim's client on the basis that the trial court failed to make the threshold determination of whether an absolute privilege applied to the hospital's use of the plaintiff's confidential personnel file at a labor relations hearing involving unionization of nurses.

Obtained jury verdict after two - week trial in Indiana state court in favor of an engineering firm subject to claims of professional negligence, fraud, and breach of contract seeking more than $ 2 million in compensatory damages as well as punitive damages.

For personal injury lawyers we require proof of 3 cases that have gone to trial in the last 5 years resulting in verdict for that lawyer and we also require 2 motions for summary judgment ruled in favor of that attorney.

Securing jury verdicts in favor of shipowners in state and federal court trials in Wisconsin and Michigan involving cases in which the plaintiffs alleged career - ending injuries.

I suppose there could be valid reasons why 4 out of every 5 jury verdicts go in favor of the doctor or hospital — maybe the strongest cases are all being settled before trial, leaving only the weakest cases behind — but it's hard to say that with a straight face when those figures mean that malpractice defendants have better odds winning in a courtroom than the odds a casino has winning its own games.

Following the Supreme Court's ruling in TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods, cases filed in the Eastern District of Texas fell from 36 % of all patent filings to 21 % [Debra Cassens Weiss, ABA Journal] «Quick trials, big verdicts favoring consumers, and a state law that allows nonresidents to easily join mass litigations made St. Louis a destination of choice for attorneys going after companies that do business nationwide.

The trial court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment on her failure to warn claim, and a jury entered a verdict in Merck's favor in October 2011 on the design defect claim.

Obtained directed verdict in favor of Florida Senate and various Florida school districts over funding distributions to school boards, after three day trial.

Instead of allowing a jury decision, at the close of the evidence, the trial court granted a directed verdict in favor of the appraiser defendants, finding that the appraised value was an opinion that could not be an actionable misrepresentation.

The trial court overruled a jury verdict in favor of the Buyers and entered judgment in favor of the Seller and Broker, due to the Buyers» failure to present expert testimony on the property's diminution in value due to the defects.

Because the Developers had failed to produce testimony to support their fraud allegations, the court affirmed the trial court's directed verdict in favor of the Salesperson.

Therefore, the court reversed the trial court and reinstated the jury verdict in favor of the Owners.

A trial was held, and the trial court entered a directed verdict in favor of the Salesperson and his broker following the conclusion of the Developers» case.

Following the verdict, the trial court entered judgment in favor of the Brokerage and Deshields, determining that the evidence did not support the award.