Sentences with phrase «tried explaining this to others»

Not exact matches

«If you really are going to try to explain to other people what you do, you have to know yourself what you do, and your employees have to know it,» he says.

And the other is that Facebook writes a blog post trying to explain the changes in as diplomatic a tone as it can muster.

The data sets aren't huge — 232 participants in October before the election and 152 after, with a total of 772 negotiations recorded — and there may be some other difference that explains the later group's more aggressive behavior, though Low tried to control for factors, like party affiliation, that might offer alternate explanations for the shift.

People who take the blame, who say they are sorry and explain why they are sorry, who don't try to push any of the blame back on the other person... those are people everyone wants in their lives, because they instantly turn a mistake into a bump in the road rather than a permanent roadblock.

«I was trying to get [my business] Effective Networking off the ground, I had debts from a business that didn't make it, and too much was in my own name,» explains Darling, who also got sidetracked by other projects that weren't generating income.

FINALLY an article that clearly states what I have been trying to explain to my CPA and other Accounting and business professionals for months!

In trying to explain how these instruments of monetary control work, I'm tempted, if only for the time being, to revert to some old - fashioned terminology that, whatever its other shortcomings, seems more useful than modern terms are for shedding light upon the nature of money creation.

Edwards and Magee do a masterful job of explaining charts, technical theory, market cycles, reversal patterns, and virtually every other major concept behind technical analysis — which you can use to try to «predict» what the market will do.

Other believers have also tried hard to explain the text of the Gospel of John... and we stay believers.

In a real league game I wouldn't try to play with the guys either, because I know dang well that they would want to hold back when it came to some of the tackling and scrumming (it'd take me a whole other paragraph to explain what this is).

This thread may have gotten to long but back to your response from last night let me try and explain again, I believe it on authority of the apostles and other people of that time period.

Hundreds of other articles on this blog try to explain this in more detail.

When you try to explain one or two of them to show that you are aware of these passages but have a different understanding, they will focus on all the other passages they quoted which you did not explain.

So me or you trying to explain him is like the piece of clay trying to explain to the other pieces of clay what the potter is like....

As Tocqueville and many others have tried to explain, religion is the source of moral discourse and moral formation for most Americans.

There's no denying that the early Christian apologists (Justin Martyr and others) made up that whacky «diabolical mimicry» notion — saying the the devil caused what looks like plagiarism in reverse; so it's pretty obvious those old Xtians were trying to explain away something that would normally look ridiculous.

Hopefully those other posts explain the point I was trying to make.

I mean, can you imagine if a president actually tried to explain the in's - and - out's of socialized healthcare within a sixty minute block, while the other candidate has already warped the public's perception being all recognition in the same time that the other guy made his boring lecture on truth and equality?

Pastors and other Bible teachers have noticed this connection, and many have gone into great hermeneutical contortions trying to explain how it would be a good think to light your enemy's head on fire.

Explaining his thought at greater length, Ossa says, «there is no place for a religion that tries to impose, only for a religion (or several) which tries to serve; no place for a religion that possesses the truth, only for one which looks for meaning with all those who look for meaning; no place for one which tries to ingratiate itself with political power, only for one which works with others in solidarity.

Whenever we try to explain our faith and put it into general concepts, whenever we put into words our other beliefs about religion, we have doctrine.

Disagree with the other person if you want to, but recognize that they are trying to understand and explain the text just as much as you are, and that just as you want them to listen to how you arrived at your conclusions regarding the text (and don't say, «I just read the Bible,» because you didn't), so also, that other person likely engaged in deep study of the biblical text to arrive at their understanding and it would benefit you to hear how they came to their understanding.

Today libraries of all sorts have shelves laden with books trying to explain, interpret and apply his thinking, but these authors are inclined to talk to each other.

But countless others have tried to explain this to you, and you stubbornly refuse to understand.

Also I think the reponses from others to your post explained what I was trying to say pretty well.

During the past twenty years sociologists have tried to explain why some denominations and congregations grow while others lose members.

It stands to reason that an all knowing eternal God could predict what you and I would believe no before He made and thus have already know whether we would except him or not And I'm not sure what you trying to say by that And because we want to tell others about Him and be used by Him to reach others And that commit does not make any sense, but clearly God is not a punk, as I have already demonstrated And your main point, as I already explained is false No, but my belief is true, none the less, it is by definition virtually impossible to prove anything And no, I don't need knee pads.

Without it, we need some smart folks to explain it to us because it get's real complicated trying to hold faith, the gospel, eternal life, salvation, repentance, and all the other teachings together with any kind of congruity.

Indeed, everybody holds certain principles of «elemental faith»: for example, that the world has some kind of order to it, and that we have some kind of moral responsibility Elemental faith and other forms of secular faith provide «points of contact» for Christians trying to explain saving faith.

It relieves us of the necessity of trying to explain how Jesus could have been mistaken on so important a matter, and the demythologizing covers the entire gamut of miracle stories and a good many other puzzling passages.

I was trying to explain something to someone the other day.

But anyway, as you well know from studying at Moody, context is important, and that quote from my class must be understood in context, which I try to explain further in the other posts in this series.

In other words, parabaino takes place when someone tries to explain and apply the law of God, but actually ends up doing the exact opposite of what the law says.

Amen.The thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it on a human logic level, for me.You may disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.

Notice that I have not tried to convert others to my faith on here; I have only explained why I made my choice.

Doing metaphysics is difficult and rewarding because we want to begin with an austere fund of basic resources and try to get, and explain, other things that we want out of it.

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.

I know that some things are hard to explain to some who don't understand them, and as much as one tries, the other person won't understand them.

My understanding — 2nd hand, but from reliable «sciency» food writers, is that when you salt the bean soaking liquid, the salt gets in the bean and then causes the bean to repel water — which has explained a period of time when EVERY SINGLE time I tried to make black bean - something - or - other the little buggers came out hard, no matter how long they soaked or cooked.

«For example, in our Connoisseur Collection, we're trying to make it as colorful as possible using violet petals or other natural garnishes to add color,» she explains.

«I often speak to hundreds of people at our own events and as a guest speaker at other events and I always try and remember that once upon a time I didn't even know what a vegan is,» he explains.

[After some back and forth Mr Cassidy tries to explain to Senator Xenophon, who seems hung up on the fact that nobody from the ACCC attended the previous day's hearings (perhaps forgetting that while politicians seem to have all the time in the world talking about things they don't understand, the ACCC has other commitments), that he really doesn't have a clue what he's talking about; he was a little more dignified than that though]

Now take a look at the skill positions, other than running back, for the Seahawks and try to explain how Wilson will fare any better than Stafford this Sunday, home or not, in a game that could have major playoff implications for both teams.

What you, and others, are trying to explain away is that Landry played much worse vs. the top 2 OLs and offenses (Notre Dame & Clemson) that BC faced in 2017.

Top the Cops is also an opportunity to generate some good PR with the teens and with the community at large, McKinnie explains: show them they're human, that they're not just trying to get them in trouble, and let the other, older drivers see them making nice with the youngsters.

To start with, Ivan Gazidis tried to soften up the fans with a video detailing the Gunners achievements (and profits) and the Chief Executive was booed and heckled as he tried to explain that the club had «over-performed» when compared to the spending of other big clubs, and used the examples of keeping Ozil and Sanchez as proof that the Board were not just financially motivateTo start with, Ivan Gazidis tried to soften up the fans with a video detailing the Gunners achievements (and profits) and the Chief Executive was booed and heckled as he tried to explain that the club had «over-performed» when compared to the spending of other big clubs, and used the examples of keeping Ozil and Sanchez as proof that the Board were not just financially motivateto soften up the fans with a video detailing the Gunners achievements (and profits) and the Chief Executive was booed and heckled as he tried to explain that the club had «over-performed» when compared to the spending of other big clubs, and used the examples of keeping Ozil and Sanchez as proof that the Board were not just financially motivateto explain that the club had «over-performed» when compared to the spending of other big clubs, and used the examples of keeping Ozil and Sanchez as proof that the Board were not just financially motivateto the spending of other big clubs, and used the examples of keeping Ozil and Sanchez as proof that the Board were not just financially motivated.

«I don't feel [any extra] pressure, I try with my words to explain as good as possible the respect we feel for other clubs and other players.

We don't use any of these products, I try not to buy too much processed foods as it is... but this is really useful for when I explain to people why Nestle (and many other such companies) are evil.

It is still of course entirely possible, but after three miscarriages, couples are usually offered an examination to try to explain the miscarriages and possibly offer medication or other help.

While it is not a legitimate excuse, it may be an important factor to consider when trying to explain to your child why the other parent chooses to be uninvolved.