It's important to remember that loss of use coverage is
triggered by a covered loss.
Triggered by a covered loss, this pays for additional living expenses arising from a covered loss.
Triggered by a covered loss, this pays for additional living expenses arising from a covered loss.
Loss of use coverage is
triggered by a covered loss, and since fire is a covered peril, you'd have coverage in that example even if you weren't the one that suffered the fire directly.
Loss of use is
triggered by a covered loss to property, and it seems likely that the property losses would be covered.
It's
triggered by a covered loss — so any loss that would cause you to use your personal property coverage, essentially.
Not exact matches
As far as
loss of use («hotel costs if...»), that's simply
triggered by a
loss covered under the policy.
That
loss of use coverage is
triggered by a
covered claim, such as weight of ice and snow, and it pays for a hotel and other additional living expenses beyond what you'd normally spend on housing and related expenses.
That
loss of use coverage is
triggered by a
covered claim, such as weight of ice and snow, and it pays for a hotel and other additional living expenses beyond what you'd normally spend on housing and related expenses.