The problem is that, except
for trivial cases, it is not clear that anyone has ever seen such a thing.
«Stop being so slow in getting rid of some of the triviality, stop hearing some of the very
trivial cases where there's no substantial damage... and just to give prompt decisions on those fewer cases which require a decision.»
In all but the
most trivial cases, science does not produce logically indisputable proofs about the natural world.
However, experts advise that regardless of
how trivial your case may appear to be, choosing a criminal defense attorney is always a wise decision so in this article, we shall discuss some of the factors to consider when choosing such an attorney.
Freedom
from trivial cases that waste lawyers» enormous creative human potential on what machines can do well enough.
They are not among the «
trivial cases» being taken to court that he refers to in 6:2; on the contrary, he goes so far as to instruct perpetrators to be handed over «to Satan for the destruction of the flesh» (5:5).
Here is a mantra that all beginning probabilists should be made to memorize: $ $ \ begin -LCB- align -RCB- events are not mutually exclusive events -RCB- \ \ exclusive events are not independent events -RCB- \ end -LCB- align -RCB- $ $ except for
the trivial case when at least one event has probability $ 0 $.
In
a trivial case, and if you really squint a lot, your argument has some resemblance to the equilibrium response.
Cox says that this is
a trivial case, but that there are much more serious problems caused by the imperative of impartiality.