For example, only 8 of 23 CMIP3 models included black carbon while less than half included future
tropospheric ozone changes.
Zhang, Y, Cooper, OR, Gaudel, A, Thompson, AM, Nédélec, P, et al. 2016
Tropospheric ozone change from 1980 to 2010 dominated by equatorward redistribution of emissions.
Not exact matches
Ebi, K. L., and G. McGregor, 2008: Climate
change,
tropospheric ozone and particulate matter, and health impacts.
My main problem with that study is that the weather models don't use any forcings at all — no
changes in
ozone, CO2, volcanos, aerosols, solar etc. — and so while some of the effects of the forcings might be captured (since the weather models assimilate satellite data etc.), there is no reason to think that they get all of the signal — particularly for near surface effects (
tropospheric ozone for instance).
1) Reducing black carbon and
tropospheric ozone now will slow the rate of climate
change within the first half of this century.
I don't think there are any significant optical property feedbacks in the stratosphere that don't require
tropospheric + surface
changes — except
ozone...
Some of these forcings are well known and understood (such as the well - mixed greenhouse gases, or recent volcanic effects), while others have an uncertain magnitude (solar), and / or uncertain distributions in space and time (aerosols,
tropospheric ozone etc.), or uncertain physics (land use
change, aerosol indirect effects etc.).
Three different
ozone databases provide regression fits to the
ozone observations, and are available for use in model studies of the influence of
ozone changes on stratospheric and
tropospheric temperatures.
In addition to regional climate
change being strongly affected by natural modes of variability, geographic differences in climate
change are related to the uneven spatial distribution of aerosols and
tropospheric ozone.
«We use 1280 years of control simulation, with constant preindustrial forcings including constant specified CO2, and a five - member ensemble of historical simulations from 1850 — 2005 including prescribed historical greenhouse gas concentrations, SO2 and other aerosol - precursor emissions, land use
changes, solar irradiance
changes,
tropospheric and stratospheric
ozone changes, and volcanic aerosol (ALL), following the recommended CMIP5 specifications.
Both black carbon and
tropospheric ozone not only contribute to climate
change, but also have negative effects on health, agricultural production and key ecosystems like forests and freshwater.
Several models also include effects of
tropospheric and stratospheric
ozone changes.
The
change in total solar irradiance over recent 11 - year sunspot cycles amounts to < 0.1 %, but greater
changes at ultraviolet wavelengths may have substantial impacts on stratospheric
ozone concentrations, thereby altering both stratospheric and
tropospheric circulation patterns... This model prediction is supported by paleoclimatic proxy reconstructions over the past millennium.
Ozone depletion in the late twentieth century was the primary driver of the observed poleward shift of the jet during summer, which has been linked to
changes in
tropospheric and surface temperatures, clouds and cloud radiative effects, and precipitation at both middle and low latitudes.
For
tropospheric ozone (driven by the
changes in NOx, VOC, OC and methane emissions, along with
changes in climate conditions), there is a clear difference between the RCPs.
Changes in atmospheric circulation could have a major effect on
tropospheric ozone.
While others have looked at how
changes in climate and in carbon dioxide concentrations may affect vegetation, Reilly and colleagues added to that mix
changes in
tropospheric ozone.
Reducing black carbon and
tropospheric ozone, conserving and restoring ecosystems and agricultural soils, limiting population by ensuring that everyone has access to safe water, sanitation, health and education and increasing R&D into energy systems — are simply some of the ways of making cost effective
changes.
Fast action to reduce short - lived climate pollutants, such as black carbon, methane, hydrofluorocarbons and
tropospheric ozone, is key to improving air quality and slowing the rate of climate
change.
... The observed patterns of
change over the past 50 years can not be explained by natural processes alone, nor by the effects of short - lived atmospheric constituents (such as aerosols and
tropospheric ozone) alone.
Zonal mean atmospheric temperature
change from 1890 to 1999 (°C per century) as simulated by the PCM model from (a) solar forcing, (b) volcanoes, (c) wellmixed greenhouse gases, (d)
tropospheric and stratospheric
ozone changes, (e) direct sulphate aerosol forcing and (f) the sum of all forcings.
But to quantify the influences (or «forcings» in climate jargon) even further, they considered three anthropogenic forcings — well - mixed greenhouse gases, sulfate aerosols, and
tropospheric and stratospheric
ozone — as well as two natural forcings —
changes in solar irradiance and volcanic aerosols — all of which are likely to influence tropopause height.»
The assessment re-affirmed that RF was a first - order metric for the global mean surface temperature response, but noted that it was inadequate for regional climate
change, especially in view of the largely regional forcing from aerosols and
tropospheric ozone (Sections 2.6, 2.8 and 10.2).
In terms of atmospheric chemistry, a strong consensus was reached for the first time that science could predict the
changes in
tropospheric ozone in response to scenarios for CH4 and the indirect greenhouse gases (CO, NOx, VOC) and that a quantitative GWP for CO could be reported.
Unger, N.B., D.T. Shindell, D.M. Koch, M. Amann, J. Cofala, and D.G. Streets, 2006: Influences of man - made emissions and climate
changes on
tropospheric ozone, methane and sulfate at 2030 from a broad range of possible futures.
Future climate
change may cause either an increase or a decrease in background
tropospheric ozone, due to the competing effects of higher water vapour and higher stratospheric input; increases in regional
ozone pollution are expected due to higher temperatures and weaker circulation.
Shindell, D., G. Faluvegi, A. Lacis, J. Hansen, R. Ruedy, and E. Aguilar, 2006: Role of
tropospheric ozone increases in 20th century climate
change.
In contrast, predictions made by the chemistry - climate models indicate that, as a consequence of
ozone recovery — a factor largely ignored by IPCC models — the
tropospheric winds in the Southern Hemisphere may actually decelerate in the high latitudes and move toward the equator, potentially reversing the direction of climate
change in that hemisphere.
The
Ozone and Water Vapor Group conducts research on the nature and causes of the depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer and the role of stratospheric and tropospheric ozone and water vapor in forcing climate change and in modifying the chemical cleansing capacity of the atmosp
Ozone and Water Vapor Group conducts research on the nature and causes of the depletion of the stratospheric
ozone layer and the role of stratospheric and tropospheric ozone and water vapor in forcing climate change and in modifying the chemical cleansing capacity of the atmosp
ozone layer and the role of stratospheric and
tropospheric ozone and water vapor in forcing climate change and in modifying the chemical cleansing capacity of the atmosp
ozone and water vapor in forcing climate
change and in modifying the chemical cleansing capacity of the atmosphere.
Methane enhances its own lifetime through
changes in the OH concentration: it leads to
changes in
tropospheric ozone, enhances stratospheric water vapour levels, and produces CO2.
Impacts on
tropospheric ozone, CH4 (through
changes in OH) and CO2 have been considered, using either an «anthropogenic» emission distribution or a «natural» emission distribution depending on the main sources for each gas.