As if writing 40 years ago, the authors of On the Way to Life present the Second Vatican Council in a manner neither in keeping with
the true doctrine of doctrinal development, the purpose of Councils, or the nature of the Tradition.
Christ taught
the true doctrine of the Godhead when he suffered himself to be baptized by John.
Embodied in that story is
the true doctrine of the ministry.
The vocation of St. John as the apostle of the Divinity of Christ's one person has fed and powered the true development of the doctrine of the Church at all times, not least in the first centuries in which
the true doctrine of both the divinity and the humanity are hammered out in great Councils, and the concepts are refined in the fires of contrary heresy against either the full Divinity or the full Humanity of Christ.
As an example he suggests the replacement of the Offertory Prayers in the Novus Ordo with those from the Missal of Blessed John XXIII thereby recovering in its fullest expression
the true doctrine of the Sacrifice of the Mass for the Novus Ordo.
The true doctrine of sense - perception is that the qualitative characters of affective tones inherent in the bodily functionings are transmuted into the characters of [external] regions.
The actual
true doctrine of Jesus could have been recorded in some of the ruled out books and practiced by groups of Christians that the stronger party in Rome declared «heretic» and stamped out long ago.
Those who adhere to
the true doctrines of Christ often end up poor because they're sacrificing themselves for others, something that other individuals do not often do.
Not exact matches
You can continue to spew out your immoral
doctrine until you die, that doesn't make it
true, and that doesn't make you any more pious even though you really want to feel better than everyone else because
of it.
belief: 1: acceptance by the mind that something is
true or real, often underpinned by an emotional or spiritual sense
of certainty 2: confidence that somebody or something is good or will be effective 3: something that somebody believes in: a statement, principle, or
doctrine that a person or group accepts as
true
For the
true claims
of Jews and Christians are based on the
doctrine of revelation, which means that they are essentially the recipients
of a message about the world, one given to them from the only source who can see the world from the perspective
of transcendence — sub specie divinitatis.
A
true Pagan may expose other
doctrines, but a
true pagan will not join combative forces to challenge another person's faith in the form
of an attack.
A lot
of churches believe in order to be considered a
true Christian, you have to also accept the
doctrine of the Trinity.
The writer to this article is not a very informed or intelligent individual and anyone who judges the LDS church by the polygamist
doctrine is missing out on a
true and virtuous, motivating, and service oriented religion, and is ultimately rejecting the gospel
of Jesus Christ.
Most disagree with the practices, interpretation and
doctrine of the other sects and many consider anyone who isn't in their particular church as «not
true Christians».
I know
of no current church body, which keeps the
true doctrine.
Argues coherently and logically that the
doctrine of Infallibility must be an essential element
of the
true Church
of Christ.
The same is
true of a
doctrine of human beings or
of societies or
of electrons, or
of the status
of the past.
«At the present time
of crisis it offers a way out
of modernism, a way that is both modern and orthodox, a
true development
of doctrine.»
If, as some persons maintain, Christianity was a total transformation
of the message
of Jesus — a
doctrine about Jesus rather than Jesus» own teaching — then it is
of paramount importance to see how and why this transformation took place, or rather, first
of all, whether the theory
of transformation is
true.
The main trouble with the
doctrine of reincarnation is that it does not seem to be
true to the facts.
True, the concepts, and the terms used to express them, are
of great importance, especially for the later history
of doctrine; and we are not likely to minimize them if we view New Testament theology as Book One or perhaps Chapter One in the History of Christian D
doctrine; and we are not likely to minimize them if we view New Testament theology as Book One or perhaps Chapter One in the History
of Christian
DoctrineDoctrine.
«None
of the
doctrines is less
true than the stories.
My definition
of «church» has definitely changed over the years, and I find myself leaning more and more toward the idea that the
true bride
of Christ is a group
of living breathing people — not a building, not an organization, not a set
of doctrines, etc. — just people who continue on the path toward faith in God.
I still believe these things to be
true and biblical, but I am now aware
of different ways
of approaching these
doctrines which require further study on my part.
The factors
of chief importance in the development
of this theology were: (a) the Old Testament — and Judaism --(b) the tradition
of religious thought in the Hellenistic world, (c) the earliest Christian experience
of Christ and conviction about his person, mission, and nature — this soon became the tradition
of the faith or the «
true doctrine» — and (d) the living, continuous, ongoing experience
of Christ — only in theory to be distinguished from the preceding — in worship, in preaching, in teaching, in open proclamation and confession, as the manifestation
of the present Spiritual Christ within his church.
By the end
of it, Flournoy had in fact reached the opposite conclusion: that LDS
doctrine is
true, supported both by Mormon scriptures and the Bible.
In a
true democracy, a
doctrine of pluralism may be a way
of safeguarding the rights
of minorities; in a hierarchy, however, where authority proceeds from a Will not constituted by any part
of the population, «pluralism» is often a code word for the project
of giving political power the ascendancy over legitimate authority.
It is
true that on various occasions he mentions other
doctrines as essential, including more objective ones such as the deity
of Christ and the Trinity.
I think that I have thus presented the Catholic
doctrine of justification, briefly, it is
true, but without having left out anything really essential.
Yet if the most important development in that
doctrine in Caritas in Veritate is a strong linkage
of the life issues to Catholic social - justice concerns, then it is also
true that the challenge
of this particular encyclical falls more sharply on those who believe that Roe v. Wade was rightly decided, and remedied an injustice in prior American law.»
While part
of what you said is quite
true, I would contend that Jesus didn't have a great sense
of humor, since it is from what Jesus supposedly said that the whole
doctrine of hell came about, as well as some ther things he said that I would contend is fairly bad advice.
And the Church must be allowed to be
true to herself — to preach Christian
doctrine and Christian morality, in and out
of season.
One
of the creative process philosophers, Charles Hartshorne, states in the beginning
of Man's Vision
of God his conviction that «a magnificent intellectual content — far surpassing that
of such systems as Thomism, Spinozism, German idealism, positivism (old or new) is implicit in the religious faith most briefly expressed in the three words, God is love».1 If this be
true what is needed is not the discarding
of metaphysics but the exploration
of this new possibility in the
doctrine of God's being.
Of particular relevance is the Buddhist doctrine of no - self and its corresponding affirmation in Zen, the doctrine of the true sel
Of particular relevance is the Buddhist
doctrine of no - self and its corresponding affirmation in Zen, the doctrine of the true sel
of no - self and its corresponding affirmation in Zen, the
doctrine of the true sel
of the
true self.
The church, it is
true, has always had to find ways
of protecting its
doctrine.
According to the document «Towards Common Witness» some
of the characteristics which distinguish proselytism from Christian witness are: unfair criticism
of caricaturing
of the
doctrines, beliefs and practices
of another church; presenting one's church or confession as «the
true church»; the use
of humanitarian aid, educational opportunities or moral and psychological pressure, to induce people to change their affiliation; exploiting people's loneliness, even disillusionment with their own church in order to «convert» them.
According to the Christian
doctrine, which I assume to be
true, the natural man is subject
of his carnal desires.
The same was
true at all levels
of the
Doctrine Index — it was the Other - worldliness and found that such silent.
«The liberal - democratic mind, just as the mind
of any
true communist, feels an inner compulsion to manifest its pious loyalty to the
doctrine.
In these ways, the objections to the idea
of truth as correspondence can be cleared away, and we can explicitly reaffirm this notion, which we all implicitly affirm in practice, and we can therefore reaffirm that the task
of the theologian involves the attempt to formulate the Christian faith in
true doctrines, and to defend the truth
of these
doctrines by showing them to be self - consistent, adequate to the facts
of experience, and illuminating.
For him this
doctrine is not only the fundamental discriminator whereby one discerns the «
true Christian» but also the universal teaching
of the Christian church — at least prior to the rise
of biblical criticism.
It is
true that he very frequently discusses his
doctrine within the context
of perception, and one
of the ways to the theory, probably the dominant one, was through the analysis
of perceptual experience.
In a free society the same is
true, but the official
doctrine is one
of responsible freedom rather than
of unquestioning compliance to fixed orders.
I think we agree on the fact that it is by faith that all are saved i have no problem with that and its in that that there is unity.You find within any christian modern church law can be mixed with Grace that is not peculiar to any domination maybe it is more extreme in some.Where there are believers there are works
of the flesh such as pride and self reliance.I was thinking today the word says if we believe in our hearts and confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord then you shall be saved.Its not a hard
doctrine to believe thats in its basic form.The seventh day have tacked on to that belief adherence to the sabbath that is sadly how denominations spring up.In the anglican church we still recite the apostles creed how many church still do that today as a basis for there faith in Jesus Christ.Your statement that some are saved is just as
true to those who go to modern christian churchs who say they are christian but walk according to the flesh..
Still, we honor those, such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and Cicero, who were able even without the blessing
of Jewish or Christian faith to develop «positive rational
doctrines of what life ought to be»»
doctrines that (while not free
of error) contain much that is profoundly
true.
For it is not
true, as a superficial view assumes, that the
doctrine of the atonement is the qualitative difference between paganism and Christianity.
Were there no such thing as inspiration, Christianity would be
true, and all its essential
doctrines would be credibly witnessed to us in the generally trustworthy reports
of the teaching
of our Lord and
of His authoritative agents in founding the Church, preserved in the writings
of the apostles and their first followers....
True development of doctrine can only be made on the basis of a faithful continuity of principle with what has already been defined, just as true theology can only be done in the spirit of loyal service of the magister
True development
of doctrine can only be made on the basis
of a faithful continuity
of principle with what has already been defined, just as
true theology can only be done in the spirit of loyal service of the magister
true theology can only be done in the spirit
of loyal service
of the magisterium.
In Fr Nesbitt's article «The Christ - Centred Vision
of Creation», in last November's issue, he pointed out that Newman «found the Scotist perspective to be
truest to the Greek Fathers he studied so closely» -LCB- Discourses to Mixed Congregations 32,1 - 2, and 358), and that in The Development
of Christian
Doctrine Newman says that «the Incarnation «establishes in the very idea
of Christianity the sacramental principle as its characteristic» because: «It is our Lord's intention in the Incarnation to make us what He is Himself.»